Why do American Blacks think they're ...

“Maat's my principle”

Level 9

Since: Jan 12

bamako,mali

#2133 Feb 18, 2013
LMBAO !
PROUDNIGG

Elk Grove Village, IL

#2134 Feb 18, 2013
Michele Yeoh wrote:
You people are from Sub-Sahara Africa not Egypt.
They'd rather be Egyptian than American
Dragonpat

Ashburn, VA

#2135 Feb 18, 2013
We moor, we egyptian, we berber, we beja, we malians, , we nubians, we kushites, we kemets but we has nosing to do with African savages. Africa is a tribal backward country that sell me and my people.
BWL is Back

Houston, TX

#2136 Feb 18, 2013
You see AA are under the ignorant presumption that Africa is black. Africa is a continent it has many different people.
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2137 Feb 18, 2013
BWL is Back wrote:
You see AA are under the ignorant presumption that Africa is black. Africa is a continent it has many different people.
but idiots like you are under the impression that blacks didnt live in north africa in ancient times and beyond,

but you would be wrong

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#2138 Feb 18, 2013
pn2cladelover wrote:
<quoted text>
but idiots like you are under the impression that blacks didnt live in north africa in ancient times and beyond,
but you would be wrong
HAH!

YOU wouldn't know your áss from a hole in the ground.
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#2139 Feb 18, 2013
Africa is Africa. All ancient African civilizations in Africa were created by Africans. White western european filth had no part in creating any of them, they only took part in their destruction. The truth is Whit filth have no ancient apart from the homosexual Rome and greece, that is why they fabricate lies about building Egypt, pyramids etc.
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#2140 Feb 18, 2013
have no acient history*
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#2141 Feb 18, 2013
pn2cladelover wrote:
<quoted text>
but idiots like you are under the impression that blacks didnt live in north africa in ancient times and beyond,
but you would be wrong
There are lots of Blacks living in various N.African countries right now. But here's the deal, if the trolls can "take Blacks outta' N.Africa, then it can said that "white" Moors helped civilize and brought order to Spain and other parts of Europe during the 'dark ages'. Whats interesting is... I saw a documentary on history channel recently that totally excluded the Moors from world history.
Barros Serrano

United States

#2142 Feb 18, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
There are lots of Blacks living in various N.African countries right now. But here's the deal, if the trolls can "take Blacks outta' N.Africa, then it can said that "white" Moors helped civilize and brought order to Spain and other parts of Europe during the 'dark ages'. Whats interesting is... I saw a documentary on history channel recently that totally excluded the Moors from world history.
You care nothing for evidence, only your racist ideology. You're in a contest with whitey for civilizations. LOL!!! You'd be laughed out of any history department in the world, boy! You're a CLOWN!

No Moors brought order to Europe! LOL!!! The Moors perpetuated the Dark Ages with their presence in the Western Mediterranean.

And the books being translated (by Jews) in Spain were mostly of European origin? The Moors were mostly Berbers, but they still didn't civilize anyone.

The Moors were not very significant in world history, fool. They were slavers, pirates and assholes (they were Muz, after all).
jumpstart

Chesapeake Beach, MD

#2143 Feb 18, 2013
the real question is why are white interested in Egypt. what is the reason behin this why the Egyptologist why are they so adamant about making egypt white. is not Egypt in Africa. how did Africans become sub-sahara. why the wordplay. is not Eastern Europe still part of Europe.
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#2144 Feb 18, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
the real question is why are white interested in Egypt. what is the reason behin this why the Egyptologist why are they so adamant about making egypt white. is not Egypt in Africa. how did Africans become sub-sahara. why the wordplay. is not Eastern Europe still part of Europe.
Well it's all about deception, lies, distortion, divide-conquer and cover-up. It seems like you to have noticed b.s. nomenclature e.g. "euroasian" ist coin by the British when they ruined India, "sub-sahara", "Near East East" ( that's stealing Egypt), "mid-east", "black Africa",.....you name it and it's been quote redefined Un-qoute.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#2145 Feb 18, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
the real question is why are white interested in Egypt. what is the reason behin this why the Egyptologist why are they so adamant about making egypt white. is not Egypt in Africa. how did Africans become sub-sahara. why the wordplay. is not Eastern Europe still part of Europe.
Are you really that dúmb?

Yes, and North Africa is still part of Africa, MÓRÓN.

Just WHY, exactly, does that have to mean that NORTH AFRICA, in your foolish opinion, should have been Black.

Do you actually 'think', if it's African territory, that it somehow would ooze Negros out of its soil, FÓÓL!?

Jack HÓLES, like YOU aren't very smart, you know!?

We happen to know, for a fact, that YOU DO NOT HAVE A RESPECTABLY SUFFICIENT I.Q. RATING.

The reason that we know that is quite simple, really.

The only way that you would seriously be making the ridiculously asinine statements, that you have, is because you are dúmb as a rock.

No one is saying that North Africa is made up of Europeans.

Actually, that's closer to what some of you ídiot Afro-Dummies are saying...HAH!

READ MY LIPS, DÚMB Áss.

North Africa is made up of OVERWHELMINGLY CAUCASIAN PEOPLES.
jumpstart

United States

#2146 Feb 18, 2013
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you really that dúmb?
Yes, and North Africa is still part of Africa, MÓRÓN.
Just WHY, exactly, does that have to mean that NORTH AFRICA, in your foolish opinion, should have been Black.
Do you actually 'think', if it's African territory, that it somehow would ooze Negros out of its soil, FÓÓL!?
Jack HÓLES, like YOU aren't very smart, you know!?
We happen to know, for a fact, that YOU DO NOT HAVE A RESPECTABLY SUFFICIENT I.Q. RATING.
The reason that we know that is quite simple, really.
The only way that you would seriously be making the ridiculously asinine statements, that you have, is because you are dúmb as a rock.
No one is saying that North Africa is made up of Europeans.
Actually, that's closer to what some of you ídiot Afro-Dummies are saying...HAH!
READ MY LIPS, DÚMB Áss.
North Africa is made up of OVERWHELMINGLY CAUCASIAN PEOPLES.
why? How did they get there? In what year and from what part of europe did.they come?

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#2147 Feb 18, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> why? How did they get there? In what year and from what part of europe did.they come?
LOOK, dammit, nobody but Afro-Boobs are saying that they came from Europe.

They were Caucasians from somewhere in Eurasia but probably NOT Europe except for maybe a few from Iberia, but,

in any case, the earliest traces of Caucasians, that are known to have successfully and permanently settled in North Africa, date back to 30,000yrs ago.

At the time of the arrival of the first Eurasians into North Africa, North Africa was completely uninhabited.

Even 30,000yrs ago, there weren't that many Humans on the entire planet of Earth.

The New World, at that time, was completely empty of any Humans.

It's not at all strange that a massively huge portion of Africa(North Africa) had also managed to be unpopulated just before the time of the arrival of the first Eurasian settlers.

You must think that representatives of the 'E'Y-Hg were all over Africa by then, but that is where you are very mistaken.

The Eurasian Haplogroups that were in North Africa, at that time, were much older than what is the average 'E' Y-Haplogroup of West Africa, today.

In fact, the first 'E'Y-Hg Peoples, that made it into North Africa(E-M35), were from East Africa and they didn't make it there until 10,000yrs after the Caucasian Eurasians had already made North Africa their home.

I know what you're 'thinking'.

You're 'thinking'...how could that be!?...if African Haplogroups existed before Caucasian Hg's, then how could they have existed before West Africans.

Well,'E'Y-Hg is NOT the only sub-Saharan originated haplogroup.

There is, after all, the 'A' and 'B' Y-Hg's, and it was Proto-'A'Y-Hg from whence Eurasians were born.

The Maghribíyan Coast Line is NOT a tropical zone anyway, and that is where the Eurasians settled and in substantial numbers.
trollslayer

Merrillville, IN

#2148 Feb 18, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> why? How did they get there? In what year and from what part of europe did.they come?
He's a disrespectful eurocentric troll who doesn't deserve to engage with posters here. 1)The Moors brought white slaves to N.Africa. 2)All of Africa once Black. The Sahara was once teaming with African life. 3)Since there were once few PPL. on earth, guess WHO those were and while ur at it ask yourself who were the 1st PPL on earth Hint: not "euroasians"
here read this. it explains the the "euroasian" lie about N.Africa:
" Indeed, there has been a long indirectly-stated desire to make the coastal northern piece of the African continent an extension of Europe, and territory which has traditionally been THE domain of European-descended peoples than of autochthonous Africans, which are generally treated as "newcomers" to the region.
In other words, some sort of a "natural" apartheid was put in place in the late Upper Paleolithic until some time in the early Holocene, preventing autochthonous Africans from inhabiting the place, while the same region was supposedly hospitable to "European immigrants".
http://www.google.com/url...
trollslayer

Merrillville, IN

#2149 Feb 18, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> why? How did they get there? In what year and from what part of europe did.they come?
Also read this:
http://www.google.com/url...

Level 2

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#2150 Feb 18, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a disrespectful eurocentric troll who doesn't deserve to engage with posters here. 1)The Moors brought white slaves to N.Africa. 2)All of Africa once Black. The Sahara was once teaming with African life. 3)Since there were once few PPL. on earth, guess WHO those were and while ur at it ask yourself who were the 1st PPL on earth Hint: not "euroasians"
here read this. it explains the the "euroasian" lie about N.Africa:
" Indeed, there has been a long indirectly-stated desire to make the coastal northern piece of the African continent an extension of Europe, and territory which has traditionally been THE domain of European-descended peoples than of autochthonous Africans, which are generally treated as "newcomers" to the region.
In other words, some sort of a "natural" apartheid was put in place in the late Upper Paleolithic until some time in the early Holocene, preventing autochthonous Africans from inhabiting the place, while the same region was supposedly hospitable to "European immigrants".
http://www.google.com/url...
If what you say is true about his statement:"who doesn't deserve to be..."

Why haven't you followed your own advice and reason from the very start? When you debate with someone who obviously only wants to argue with you, you are the one who looks bad--not him or her.

Each time you and others continue to debate with him, he is the winner, while you and others who fall for his challenge are the losers. He proves that he can get you to not only pay attention to what he says, but you seem to care enough about what he says to respond to it.

Intelligent people don't learn history from Wikipedia, from Topix threads or any second-hand posts--intelligent people do their own research of European versions of history and black African versions of history, and using reason and logic, they will arrive at their own conclusions--they won't be blind followers like church goers taking their pastor's words as truth and facts.

The next time you engage in an online debate, think of how you look to others. It makes you seem desperate for validation from others. Validation from others doesn't make you right or wrong--it simply means others embrace your way of thinking. Even during slavery, the majority of Whites supported those laws, but that didn't make it right, just because a majority of a ruling group throws their support behind something doesn't make it right or wrong, and you being validated in this forum doesn't make you right or wrong--it simply means that you and others are either like-minded people or you all are not, but that's all it means.
trollslayer

Merrillville, IN

#2151 Feb 18, 2013
NoArguingAllowed wrote:
<quoted text>
If what you say is true about his statement:"who doesn't deserve to be..."
Why haven't you followed your own advice and reason from the very start? When you debate with someone who obviously only wants to argue with you, you are the one who looks bad--not him or her.
Each time you and others continue to debate with him, he is the winner, while you and others who fall for his challenge are the losers. He proves that he can get you to not only pay attention to what he says, but you seem to care enough about what he says to respond to it.
Intelligent people don't learn history from Wikipedia, from Topix threads or any second-hand posts--intelligent people do their own research of European versions of history and black African versions of history, and using reason and logic, they will arrive at their own conclusions--they won't be blind followers like church goers taking their pastor's words as truth and facts.
The next time you engage in an online debate, think of how you look to others. It makes you seem desperate for validation from others. Validation from others doesn't make you right or wrong--it simply means others embrace your way of thinking. Even during slavery, the majority of Whites supported those laws, but that didn't make it right, just because a majority of a ruling group throws their support behind something doesn't make it right or wrong, and you being validated in this forum doesn't make you right or wrong--it simply means that you and others are either like-minded people or you all are not, but that's all it means.
if you notice most of my discussions are with non-trolls.
Now can you tell us why you are here? What are your 24 posts about?
jumpstart

United States

#2152 Feb 18, 2013
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
LOOK, dammit, nobody but Afro-Boobs are saying that they came from Europe.
They were Caucasians from somewhere in Eurasia but probably NOT Europe except for maybe a few from Iberia, but,
in any case, the earliest traces of Caucasians, that are known to have successfully and permanently settled in North Africa, date back to 30,000yrs ago.
At the time of the arrival of the first Eurasians into North Africa, North Africa was completely uninhabited.
Even 30,000yrs ago, there weren't that many Humans on the entire planet of Earth.
The New World, at that time, was completely empty of any Humans.
It's not at all strange that a massively huge portion of Africa(North Africa) had also managed to be unpopulated just before the time of the arrival of the first Eurasian settlers.
numbers.
who were these early caucasians and were they from.did the eurasian arriviving 30k years ago.find north africa uninhabited. Where were they from.and why did the choose north africa if it were mostly uninhabited? What language did they speak? What was their religion?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min BlueFlag 1,603,115
NFL verses NASCAR 4 min Got_Rope 1
News On Twitter, Trump accuses blacks of racism thre... 18 min GraspThe Obvious 137
Once you go black NO ONE wants you back! (Apr '09) 19 min spyrograf jr 7
News Trump Repeats Call to Fire Athletes Who Kneel f... 22 min Marcus Washington 82
DISRESPECTING Whites; Demise of Euro-centric Wo... 22 min Tom 2
Is it possible that Blacks built smaller pyrami... 26 min Marcus Washington 22
Negroes are vulgar, degenerate perverts. 46 min 7tonir 36
NFL ratings declining 1 hr Little Bigfoot 40
White Desperation on Topix to have Blacks ACCEP... 3 hr Whitesupreme 32
More from around the web