Why do American Blacks think they're ...
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2274 Feb 24, 2013
Peter wrote:
<quoted text>
That wasn't an opinion, I'm basing the facts on ancient evidence, they are the ones who base their claims on personal opinions. In the national geographic article they claim the reconstruction of King Tut is "The most accurate forensic reconstruction ever of ancient Egypt's Pharaoh Tutankhamun." like I said misleading. Similar cause they only reconstructed faces that show him white looking. Yes I did answer your questions, royals did not intermix outside their own kind.
3rd time asking

what do you mean by mixed ancient egypt??

simple question
Peter

Springfield, NJ

#2275 Feb 24, 2013
pn2cladelover wrote:
<quoted text>
3rd time asking
what do you mean by mixed ancient egypt??
simple question
What does the general population biologically make up have to do with Royals? Nothing. Royals aren't the biological parents of the general populations. They inbreed to preserve their bloodlines.
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2276 Feb 24, 2013
Peter wrote:
<quoted text>
What does the general population biologically make up have to do with Royals? Nothing. Royals aren't the biological parents of the general populations. They inbreed to preserve their bloodlines.
you made a statement in a post that ancient egypt was mixed , i want to know why you think that.

did it start mixed , did it get mixed as time went on by????

i dont agrre it was mixed to dtart off with, the ancient egyptians were black african then became more mixed as time went on

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#2278 Feb 24, 2013
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
HAH!
What YOU really mean is...'don't argue with "CURIOUS ME" because he will kick your ígnorant uneducated jággedy äss to tatters.
Well, too bad for YOU, because, be it politically popular or not, such nomenclature is still very much a part of a scrutinizingly organized system of anthropological classification.

HAH!

May I politely suggest that YOUR system of haphazard pseudo-classification(Black, White, African, European, Yellow, Red, or whatever) is anything BUT scientific and is actually rather laughable at best.

•••

Even the Alpha-Numeric nomenclature of strictly 'CLADISTIC' classification is somewhat less than fully accurate.

"::Commercial determination of ancestry::

New research in molecular genetics, and the marketing of genetic identities through the analysis of one's Y chromosome, mtDNA, or autosomal DNA to the general public in the form of "Personalized Genetic Histories" (PGH) has caused debate.

Typically, a consumer of a commercial PGH service sends in a sample of DNA which is analyzed by molecular biologists and is sent a report. Shriver and Kittles remarked:

For many customers of lineage-based tests, there is a lack of understanding that their maternal and paternal lineages do not necessarily represent their entire genetic make-up. For example, an individual might have more than 85% Western European 'genomic' ancestry but still have a West African mtDNA or NRY lineage.[179]"
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#2279 Feb 24, 2013
Peter wrote:
<quoted text>
That wasn't an opinion, I'm basing the facts on ancient evidence, they are the ones who base their claims on personal opinions. In the national geographic article they claim the reconstruction of King Tut is "The most accurate forensic reconstruction ever of ancient Egypt's Pharaoh Tutankhamun." like I said misleading. Similar cause they only reconstructed faces that show him white looking. Yes I did answer your questions, royals did not intermix outside their own kind.
The question was.... about mixed Egypt NOT ROYALS

Level 5

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#2280 Feb 24, 2013
Peter wrote:
<quoted text>
huh?? Did you mean to respond to another's post? Don't know who or what this "jeff" is.
Child please. You are not fooling me.
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2281 Feb 24, 2013
Afreekan wrote:
<quoted text>
Child please. You are not fooling me.
yeah ,he does sound like jeff

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#2282 Feb 24, 2013
pn2cladelover wrote:
<quoted text>
you made a statement in a post that ancient egypt was mixed , i want to know why you think that.
did it start mixed , did it get mixed as time went on by????
i dont agrre it was mixed to dtart off with, the ancient egyptians were black african then became more mixed as time went on
Well, too bad for YOU, because it most certainly WAS mixed before it ever started up.

There were permanent successfully settled Caucasians in North Africa 10,000yrs before there were any successfully settled People from sub-Saharan Africa.

Them BE the anthropological facts, and nothing that you may say or do will alter that fact.

By the time 'E-M78'Y-Hg had coalesced in Egypt, the 'E-M35'Y-Hg progenitor of 'E-M78'Y-Hg had already mixed in with the general Caucasian population of North Africa.
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2283 Feb 24, 2013
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, too bad for YOU, because it most certainly WAS mixed before it ever started up.
There were permanent successfully settled Caucasians in North Africa 10,000yrs before there were any successfully settled People from sub-Saharan Africa.
Them BE the anthropological facts, and nothing that you may say or do will alter that fact.
By the time 'E-M78'Y-Hg had coalesced in Egypt, the 'E-M35'Y-Hg progenitor of 'E-M78'Y-Hg had already mixed in with the general Caucasian population of North Africa.
no there wasnt, their was always blacks in north africa

example -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Mushabian_culture
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2284 Feb 24, 2013
Peter

Springfield, NJ

#2285 Feb 24, 2013
Afreekan wrote:
<quoted text>
Child please. You are not fooling me.
You can believe whatever you want. I'm not "jeff". If you have issues with this "jeff" character, then take it up with him.
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#2286 Feb 24, 2013
pn2cladelover wrote:
<quoted text>
no there wasnt, their was always blacks in north africa
example -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Mushabian_culture
Mushabian culture
http://www.google.com/url...

African admixture in Europe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.google.com/url...

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#2287 Feb 24, 2013
Bakari Neferu wrote:
<quoted text>
None of this means anything.
Just what the hell are "caucasoid elements"? Why do you continue to use goofy terms that don't mean sh*t and then make-believe that they are scientifically valid and logically consistent?
Well, too bad for YOU, because, be it politically popular or not, such nomenclature is still very much a part of a scrutinizingly organized system of anthropological classification.

HAH!

May I politely suggest that YOUR system of haphazard pseudo-classification(Black, White, African, European, Yellow, Red, or whatever) is anything BUT scientific and is actually rather illogical and anthropologically inconsistent at best.

•••

Even the Alpha-Numeric nomenclature of strictly 'CLADISTIC' classification is somewhat less than fully accurate.

"::Commercial determination of ancestry::

New research in molecular genetics, and the marketing of genetic identities through the analysis of one's Y chromosome, mtDNA, or autosomal DNA to the general public in the form of "Personalized Genetic Histories" (PGH) has caused debate.

Typically, a consumer of a commercial PGH service sends in a sample of DNA which is analyzed by molecular biologists and is sent a report. Shriver and Kittles remarked:

For many customers of lineage-based tests, there is a lack of understanding that their maternal and paternal lineages do not necessarily represent their entire genetic make-up. For example, an individual might have more than 85% Western European 'genomic' ancestry but still have a West African mtDNA or NRY lineage.[179]"
jumpstart

United States

#2288 Feb 24, 2013
Peter wrote:
<quoted text>
I already told you it was Egyptians but POST 525BC no Egyptian was ruler of Egypt for over 2000 plus year. They were All Foreigners from Europeans to Near Eastern and Asiatic types. The next Egyptian to rule Egypt is in the 1950s.
so before 525 egypt was all black no eutopean or asian influence.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#2289 Feb 24, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> so before 525 egypt was all black no eutopean or asian influence.
No one can be as vapidly vacuous as YOU unless they'd just had a telephone pole shoved up through their nose.

“Maat's my principle”

Level 9

Since: Jan 12

bamako,mali

#2290 Feb 24, 2013
AEgypt was a black Empire fo' so' whom ever wants to deny this fact is either racist or straight up ignorant !

Level 4

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2291 Feb 24, 2013
dcool wrote:
AEgypt was a black Empire fo' so' whom ever wants to deny this fact is either racist or straight up ignorant !
Highly implausible!
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2292 Feb 24, 2013
McAlister73 wrote:
<quoted text>
Highly implausible!
it was a black empire

deal with it

no point trolling and fantasising about a caucasian egypt, it didnt exsist

Level 4

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2293 Feb 24, 2013
pn2cladelover wrote:
<quoted text>
it was a black empire
deal with it
no point trolling and fantasising about a caucasian egypt, it didnt exsist
Help thou mine unbelief!
pn2cladelover

Netherlands

#2294 Feb 24, 2013
McAlister73 wrote:
<quoted text>
Help thou mine unbelief!
it dosent matter what you believe

the facts are the proto egyptians were black

dna
archaeology
written history
eye witness accounts
the AE themselves
egyptologists

say the same thing

on your side is

a few white eurocentric egyptologist and historian

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 1 min Moses 46,475
Black guys dating Indian girls (Mar '10) 4 min kokhar 7
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min BIBLE NEWS 1,395,677
5 stabbed @ white nationalist trump rally 9 min LMBAO 94
News Dueling groups to rally at Confederate landmark 15 min southern at heart 2,084
Africans discovered the AMERICA before Columbus! (Jan '12) 24 min Moses 7,970
News African-Americans should start voting for Repub... 26 min Hillbilly 295
News Donald Trump Is Unfit to Lead 1 hr Fit2Serve 94
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 1 hr Moses 32,671
Do you understand 6 hr Truth Hurts 28
More from around the web