Comments
1 - 20 of 74 Comments Last updated Jan 17, 2013
First Prev
of 4
Next Last
yop

France

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Hi i heard some guys telling that black race is superior.i don t agree i m black but it s wrong to say that.indeed white race came over million years from black race.they were more evoluated clever more adapted to the environment.so they dominated us,their ancestors,enslaved us,...but now it s over we must forget that.it s the evolution.and in a same mmanner,the first humans which were blacks came from monkeys,evolution gave them a better intelligence or adaptation than monkeys.so these black men began to dominate their ancestors monkeys,hunting and eating them,still today.it s part of the evolution..we cannot do anything against it.we must accept that whites are better than us and forget the past.
Nibiru is a mulatto

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jan 16, 2013
 
sand-cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
You're either a hopeless uncle Tom, or a white troll. Whatever the case, shut the F up.
You will get left behind for that remark!
yop

France

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jan 16, 2013
 
So you think whites are inferior,don t you?you think i m wrong to tell we mustn t treat white as they did with our ancestors.if you feel like acting like that,let me tell you that you make a mistake.bye.
Sean Coonery

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jan 16, 2013
 
sand-cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
Be gone you devil-spawn, spirit of evil, and go back to the pit! The power of Christ compels you!!
hey, that Nibiru never did show up, did it? more coonishness from sandcracker, the king of the coons. You belong on a minstrel show.
swing the schwoogies

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jan 16, 2013
 
sand-cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
They are indeed inferior. But nevertheless, I don't advocate enslaving them. We shouldn't stoop to their level.
You dumb mulatto, you're half cracker yourself lol

...and none of us forget that YOU wre one of the fucheads that really believed the 2012 conspiracy, and specific the end of White people.

Well, we're still here, hybrid.

As for enslaving folk, your ancestors already sampled that from both sides, you mulatto moron lol
swing the schwoogies

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

yop wrote:
Hi i heard some guys telling that black race is superior.i don t agree i m black but it s wrong to say that.indeed white race came over million years from black race.they were more evoluated clever more adapted to the environment.so they dominated us,their ancestors,enslaved us,...but now it s over we must forget that.it s the evolution.and in a same mmanner,the first humans which were blacks came from monkeys,evolution gave them a better intelligence or adaptation than monkeys.so these black men began to dominate their ancestors monkeys,hunting and eating them,still today.it s part of the evolution..we cannot do anything against it.we must accept that whites are better than us and forget the past.
Your view of descent of Whites is wrong, under contemporary thinking.

White people did NOT descend from Africans.

Early 'humans' split in Ethiopia, about 60,000 to 70,000 years ago, one group went west and became the savage, vile, unintelligent Nigguhs. The other group eventually left Africa and colonized the world.

White people evolved from the Out Of Africa group, and not the sub-Saharan Nigguhs.

Interestingly, ALL of the descendants that left Africa were the ones that actually achieved major advanced for mankind. They also have Neanderthal DNA.

West coast Africans, our slave descendants, do not have Neanderthal DNA and achieved very little of worth. They also have the DNA of some other ancient non-sapien 'human', probably Heidelbergensis. Not surprisingly, this indicates that early Africans were f ucking creatures pretty much closer to chimpanzees, than humans.

Hope this helps.
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jan 16, 2013
 
sand-cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
They are indeed inferior. But nevertheless, I don't advocate enslaving them. We shouldn't stoop to their level.
No human group is inferior. However, if I hear you spew that racism in my presence you'll have a sudden inferior ability to walk, boy.

On other posts Afronazis are bragging about enslaving and raping pearlybottomed slave girls, and now slavery is “beneath” you? LOL!!!

Get your story straight, asshole.
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Jan 16, 2013
 
swing the schwoogies wrote:
<quoted text>
You dumb mulatto, you're half cracker yourself lol
...and none of us forget that YOU wre one of the fucheads that really believed the 2012 conspiracy, and specific the end of White people.
Well, we're still here, hybrid.
As for enslaving folk, your ancestors already sampled that from both sides, you mulatto moron lol
He's literally a hybrid, being mixed of 3 species, Homo sapiens, neandertalensis and heidelbergensis. I think he inherited the worst traits of each...
Bigsmoke

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jan 16, 2013
 
swing the schwoogies wrote:
<quoted text>
Your view of descent of Whites is wrong, under contemporary thinking.
White people did NOT descend from Africans.
Early 'humans' split in Ethiopia, about 60,000 to 70,000 years ago, one group went west and became the savage, vile, unintelligent Nigguhs. The other group eventually left Africa and colonized the world.
White people evolved from the Out Of Africa group, and not the sub-Saharan Nigguhs.
Interestingly, ALL of the descendants that left Africa were the ones that actually achieved major advanced for mankind. They also have Neanderthal DNA.
West coast Africans, our slave descendants, do not have Neanderthal DNA and achieved very little of worth. They also have the DNA of some other ancient non-sapien 'human', probably Heidelbergensis. Not surprisingly, this indicates that early Africans were f ucking creatures pretty much closer to chimpanzees, than humans.
Hope this helps.
Recent studies say Sapiens and Neanderthals didn't mix.

Also if they did I hope you do know Australian Aborigines would have such an admixture and they never even left the Stone Age let alone produced a single civilization while west Africans did so and independently. The same for many native American groups.

So you were saying...?

LOL, you're incredibly thick. The first humans were over 4 million years removed from chimpanzees ancestors at time where just before the ''Out Of Africa migration'' occurred they were over 6 million years removed which remains around the same distance to date.

Ha!
Bigsmoke

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jan 16, 2013
 
The same for many native American groups....never leaving the stone age or producing a single civilization.

Sapiens > Neanderthals

Neanderthals were inferior to the superior Sapien hence why they're extinct while Sapiens number over 7 billion.
yop

France

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Jan 16, 2013
 
Yes you re right.but you shouldn t say they are inferiors.actually they re not.i think we have to forget the past and live with them in peace,think of them as brothers not as inferiors bloody enemies.it s only that way we ll manage to build a better futur for our children.
Bigsmoke

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jan 16, 2013
 
yop wrote:
Yes you re right.but you shouldn t say they are inferiors.actually they re not.i think we have to forget the past and live with them in peace,think of them as brothers not as inferiors bloody enemies.it s only that way we ll manage to build a better futur for our children.
Neanderthals are extinct.....

Neanderthals were clearly inferior to Sapiens who displaced then wiped them out of lands they were even more adapted to.
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jan 16, 2013
 
sand-cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I cannot forget the past, yet am inclined to forgive the whites their transgressions. I do not hate them; I merely pity them. They're inferior, and it's the objective truth. But it's not their fault that they're born white, is it?
It will be your fault when you're lying groaning and bleeding into the sand with a machete up your ass, boy.
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jan 16, 2013
 
sand-cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
You have been listening to the fake jew Barros Serrano for too long. The "exotic" DNA in W.Africans haven't been yet identified as belonging to H.Sapiens, Heidelbergensis or whatever, but the most probable candidate is the one of the very few hominid fossils found in W.Africa - the so-called Iwo Eleru fossil - and guess what, it has been described as "archaic H.SAPIENS", UNLIKE your NON-SAPIENS ancestors the NEANDERTHALS. Therefore, you're still INFERIOR.
Ignorant moron, usually the term “archaic sapiens” was used to describe heidelbergensis! LOL!! For a long time the species name heidelbergensis was not used. Archaic sapiens = heidelbergensis, boy!

YOU = 3 species-in-1!!! Celebrate your diversity.
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jan 16, 2013
 
swing the schwoogies wrote:
<quoted text>
Your view of descent of Whites is wrong, under contemporary thinking.
White people did NOT descend from Africans.
Early 'humans' split in Ethiopia, about 60,000 to 70,000 years ago, one group went west and became the savage, vile, unintelligent Nigguhs. The other group eventually left Africa and colonized the world.
White people evolved from the Out Of Africa group, and not the sub-Saharan Nigguhs.
Interestingly, ALL of the descendants that left Africa were the ones that actually achieved major advanced for mankind. They also have Neanderthal DNA.
West coast Africans, our slave descendants, do not have Neanderthal DNA and achieved very little of worth. They also have the DNA of some other ancient non-sapien 'human', probably Heidelbergensis. Not surprisingly, this indicates that early Africans were f ucking creatures pretty much closer to chimpanzees, than humans.
Hope this helps.
Homo heidelbergensis was nothing like a chimp. Heidelbergensis was similar to a neandertalensis, but with less robusticity and a smaller brain.
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jan 16, 2013
 
sand-cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
White traits and genes are recessive. The white ancestry I have is completely overshadowed and made irrelevant by the black.
Wrong, boy. Most white genes are not recessive. Are you as dark as your black parent? I know you're not. Those are WHITE genes in action making you look like a halfbreed, boy!

What color are your eyes? LOL!!!

You're a fool with no knowledge, a self-hating worthless irrelevant misfit, boy!

Cracka!
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jan 16, 2013
 
Bigsmoke wrote:
The same for many native American groups....never leaving the stone age or producing a single civilization.
Sapiens > Neanderthals
Neanderthals were inferior to the superior Sapien hence why they're extinct while Sapiens number over 7 billion.
The notion of “superiority” is not valid scientifically.

The better-adapted species predominate.

Neandertals were already in decline before sapiens arrived.
swing the schwoogies

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jan 16, 2013
 
Bigsmoke wrote:
<quoted text>
Neanderthals are extinct.....
Neanderthals were clearly inferior to Sapiens who displaced then wiped them out of lands they were even more adapted to.
Here's the thing, the Sapiens that wiped out the Neanderthals were pretty fresh out of Africa, meaning, that Africans are the ONLY humans who have made an entire spaces of humans extinct.

No surprise to humans....
Barros Serrano

Magdalena, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jan 16, 2013
 
Django wrote:
Why do they stalk a black forum. If whites are so superior, why do they Peel in the life giving sun?
You sure are stupid, boy.

Skin color is due to adaptation to environment. Dark people would have died of rickets in the north. So are they inferior?

Who's inferior are uneducated racist dimwits like you, boy! Spew your racism in my presence and you'll be even more inferior due to all the broken bones and lost blood.
Bigsmoke

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jan 16, 2013
 
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
The notion of “superiority” is not valid scientifically.
The better-adapted species predominate.
Neandertals were already in decline before sapiens arrived.
Well I'm no scientist.

Sapiens = 7,000,000,000+
Neanderthals = 0

Sapiens > Neanderthals

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
Seattle Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••