U.S. Invades Black Nations but Gives White Nations a Pass.

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#1 Sep 26, 2013
When Black militants from neighboring Somalia sought revenge for Kenyans murderous bombing campaign, White folks invaded Kenya without a second thought. The U.S. population contains Anglicans, Spanish, Italians, Germans, jews and Blacks!!!!! Why doesn't the U.S. invade other nations?
.
When England was fighting the Irish, the United States hardly covered the hostilities in the media. When Russia was having trouble with Chechnya there wasn't an intrusive Western power to be found. When Spain was in conflict with Basque Separtist, the U.S. was conspicuously absent. When China invaded Tibet, no Western power showed up. When Poland found itself dealing with the Solidarity movement, again the U.S. and the West did not appear.
.

BUT WHEN AFRICA has a problem, guess what happens? the U.S., England, Israel and virtually every other European nation cries "TERRORIST' and jumps on the small African nation with all four feet!!!!!
.

I dare not mention the U.S. funded renegades that are ravishing African villages, raping women, killing their husbands and forcing the young to fight rebellious wars.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#2 Sep 26, 2013
Clinton bombed the Serbs.
Syrious

Athens, GA

#3 Sep 26, 2013
And the Syrians look white. Prolly why the US & gang(s) haven't attacked yet.
bohogamy

United States

#4 Sep 26, 2013
but one must wonder why wont africa..focus one building home grown military aparatus?..do they even have nuks in africa?..if they dont then they should prepare for slavery part two..africans dont learn..
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#5 Sep 26, 2013
sONE wrote:
Clinton bombed the Serbs.
You have a point. Thanks. The entire operation during that period was misrepresented by the press. I remember reading report after report and I still couldn't figure out exactly what was going on. To the best of my knowledge NATO bombed Muslim communities, but did nothing about the massacres, rape houses, etc.
.
But, I don't want to go into researching the issue, so I give you your point. Thanks.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#6 Sep 26, 2013
Syrious wrote:
And the Syrians look white. Prolly why the US & gang(s) haven't attacked yet.
Duhh! the U.S. has not invaded Syria!!! Curious, nevertheless, even the planned bombing campaign was to be completed with "no boots on the ground."
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#7 Sep 26, 2013
bohogamy wrote:
but one must wonder why wont africa..focus one building home grown military aparatus?..do they even have nuks in africa?..if they dont then they should prepare for slavery part two..africans dont learn..
South Africa has the bomb.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#8 Sep 26, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a point. Thanks. The entire operation during that period was misrepresented by the press. I remember reading report after report and I still couldn't figure out exactly what was going on. To the best of my knowledge NATO bombed Muslim communities, but did nothing about the massacres, rape houses, etc.
.
But, I don't want to go into researching the issue, so I give you your point. Thanks.
How you twist the truth!

You claim the West won't intervene on itself, on other white nations. Not only Serbia but also Bosnia spring to mind...

I wish Clinton had intervened in Rwanda quickly, which he now admits he should have done, and left Serbia alone, as his actions wrongly enabled a Muz terrorist takeover of Kosovo, by rights Serbian territory.

You think nobody should help Kenya if they are in danger of being overrun by jihadis?

Well, you're a jihadi yourself... therefore your opinion is worthless.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#9 Sep 26, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Duhh! the U.S. has not invaded Syria!!! Curious, nevertheless, even the planned bombing campaign was to be completed with "no boots on the ground."
Nor did the USA put “boots on the ground” in Libya. Yet according to you they'd be overrunning the place.

You're a lying hypocrite who makes excuses for the crimes of jihadis, bloody dictators, etc., as long as they're not Western allies.

Pffffft...
Boon

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#10 Sep 26, 2013
bohogamy wrote:
but one must wonder why wont africa..focus one building home grown military aparatus?..do they even have nuks in africa?..if they dont then they should prepare for slavery part two..africans dont learn..
53 countries in African which countries are dependent western military for securities. Kenya is another story.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#11 Sep 26, 2013
This issue is not about Africa per se. It is about Islam, jihadis.

The same sort of Islamomaddened misfits who are mass-raping in Sweden.

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#12 Sep 26, 2013
I hear black leaders complaining about the theory that white countries never help black countries unless there is something there for them. So either prove those white nations had resources needed by America or else this point is invalid.
Giggs

Manchester, UK

#13 Sep 26, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
When England was fighting the Irish, the United States hardly covered the hostilities in the media.
USA isn't going to intervene with us because we have nukes.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#15 Sep 26, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Nor did the USA put “boots on the ground” in Libya. Yet according to you they'd be overrunning the place.
You're a lying hypocrite who makes excuses for the crimes of jihadis, bloody dictators, etc., as long as they're not Western allies.
Pffffft...
Excuse me, but Libya is IN Africa. I'm not in touch with that particular thread, but I do remember making the point that war material was provided by the U.S., e.g., intelligence, logistics, etc. Again, not to go into detail on this one, I recall researching the point and posting that the U.S. bore over 50% of the cost of the Libyan war.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#16 Sep 26, 2013
sassyntrashy wrote:
I hear black leaders complaining about the theory that white countries never help black countries unless there is something there for them. So either prove those white nations had resources needed by America or else this point is invalid.
Interesting point. Black leaders complain about a lot of things.: D
Specifically, which complaint is invalid?

Level 4

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#17 Sep 26, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
When Black militants from neighboring Somalia sought revenge for Kenyans murderous bombing campaign, White folks invaded Kenya without a second thought. The U.S. population contains Anglicans, Spanish, Italians, Germans, jews and Blacks!!!!! Why doesn't the U.S. invade other nations?
.
When England was fighting the Irish, the United States hardly covered the hostilities in the media. When Russia was having trouble with Chechnya there wasn't an intrusive Western power to be found. When Spain was in conflict with Basque Separtist, the U.S. was conspicuously absent. When China invaded Tibet, no Western power showed up. When Poland found itself dealing with the Solidarity movement, again the U.S. and the West did not appear.
.
BUT WHEN AFRICA has a problem, guess what happens? the U.S., England, Israel and virtually every other European nation cries "TERRORIST' and jumps on the small African nation with all four feet!!!!!
.
I dare not mention the U.S. funded renegades that are ravishing African villages, raping women, killing their husbands and forcing the young to fight rebellious wars.
Man, there is all kinds of shit going in Africa that we never get involved in. Did we got involved in Liberia in 1989 when Charles Taylor started a coup which left more than 20,000 dead? What about the Hutus and Tutsis?

Remember we are are in a war with Al Queda. Also some of these militants are reported to be Americans. That makes it part of our business. It makes perfect sense.

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#18 Sep 26, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting point. Black leaders complain about a lot of things.: D
Specifically, which complaint is invalid?
If America had no financial gain from attacking white countries that could be why they stayed out.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#19 Sep 26, 2013
McAlister73 wrote:
<quoted text>
Man, there is all kinds of shit going in Africa that we never get involved in. Did we got involved in Liberia in 1989 when Charles Taylor started a coup which left more than 20,000 dead? What about the Hutus and Tutsis?
Remember we are are in a war with Al Queda. Also some of these militants are reported to be Americans. That makes it part of our business. It makes perfect sense.
Charles Taylor:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/26/us-...

Rwanda:

French sent troops and admit their culpability.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#20 Sep 26, 2013
McAlister73 wrote:
<quoted text>
Man, there is all kinds of shit going in Africa that we never get involved in. Did we got involved in Liberia in 1989 when Charles Taylor started a coup which left more than 20,000 dead? What about the Hutus and Tutsis?
Remember we are are in a war with Al Queda. Also some of these militants are reported to be Americans. That makes it part of our business. It makes perfect sense.
As yet I've read no reliable official confirmation that Americans or the White widow were involved. Clearly, if the Establishment could show as much, proof positive, their photos would be all over the net. Remember during 911, the media rushed to show government approved photos of the alleged culprits, and only later did it turn out that many of the published photos belonged to folks who were alive and well.

Level 4

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#21 Sep 26, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
As yet I've read no reliable official confirmation that Americans or the White widow were involved. Clearly, if the Establishment could show as much, proof positive, their photos would be all over the net. Remember during 911, the media rushed to show government approved photos of the alleged culprits, and only later did it turn out that many of the published photos belonged to folks who were alive and well.
Yeah but they aren't so eager to show that these terrorist are ours. That's why we ain't hearing much of anything right now.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Latino Men/Black Women (Mar '12) 5 min Samoan Irish 3,761
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 9 min African AE 31,263
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min Grey Ghost 1,193,094
Was Jesus or Mohammed black ? (Sep '14) 17 min Black Power 337
I'm EXTREMELY racist, but love my Black wife (Apr '10) 21 min Tina 163
I’m Afraid Blacks will take over the world 22 min Broken Synthesis 14
African AE, states that Kurds are white? 22 min Black Power 54
Jessie Washington Lynching 27 min Broken Synthesis 51
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 4 hr Glimmer 110,175
All women prefer white men 4 hr SadButTrue 2,686
White US children will be minorities by 2020 af... 4 hr TheOriginalDoby 43
More from around the web