Home Erectus, From Early Africa (Blacks)

Posted in the African-American Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of34
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Tim John

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jun 24, 2008
 
Homo erectus ("upright man") is an extinct species of the genus Homo. It lived from about 1.8 million years ago (mya) to 50-70,000 years ago. However, often the early phase, from 1.8 to 1.25 (or 1.6) mya, is considered to be a separate species, Homo ergaster, or it is seen as a subspecies of H. erectus, Homo erectus ergaster (Mayr 2001). Although H. erectus was originally believed to have disappeared roughly 400,000 years ago, the dating of deposits thought to contain H. erectus fossils in Java were placed at only 50,000 years ago, meaning that at least one population would have been a contemporary of modern humans (Smithsonian 2007a).

Fossil findings of early hominids is often fragmentary and inferences speculative, and although fossils of Homo erectus are much more common and complete than those of Homo habilis, researchers are not even sure into how many species the fossils can be placed. Nonetheless, it is clear that Homo erectus was a major stage in the history of human evolution. Just as in the stage-by-stage development of individuals (egg, baby, child, adolescent, adult) and the history of life on Earth (Precambrian, Cambrian, Ordovician, etc.), Homo erectus served as a foundation for subsequent stages, and it is considered to have given rise to Neandertals and Homo sapiens (Mayr 2001). H. erectus is thought to have been the first human ancestor to walk truly upright.

Homo erectus was apparently very successful, considering that fossils of the species have been found in Africa, Asia (Indonesia and China), and Georgia (Caucasus region of Europe)(Mayr 2001). It is considered to be the first hominid to spread out of Africa. The differences between the early populations of H. erectus in Africa and the later populations found in Asia, Europe, and Africa are substantial enough for the separation by many researchers into the early African H. ergaster and the mainly Asian populations H. erectus (Smithsonian 2007b).

Fossilized remains, dating to as early as 1.8 million years ago, have been found in Africa (AFRICA)(Lake Turkana, Kenya and Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, among others. Homo erectus would bear a striking resemblance to modern humans, but had a brain about 75 percent (950 to 1100 cc) of the size of that of a modern human. These early hominins were tall, on average standing about 1.79 m (5 feet, 10 inches).
Tim John

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jun 24, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Whites and Asians and every other humans came from early Blacks, you don't like it call your schalors and yell at them!!!
Tim John

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jun 24, 2008
 
Yellow skin and White skin is recessive compared to Brown and Black skin. Asians and Whites and all other races on this planet came from early Black Africans none as Homo erectus, Period.

If you have evidence to refute these scholars and doctors at the Smithsonian I would love to see it.
NOT FIRST

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jun 24, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tim John wrote:
Whites and Asians and every other humans came from early Blacks, you don't like it call your schalors and yell at them!!!
We all came from a common ancestor. Noone knows for sure what this ancestor looked like exactly.This theory is based solely on the oldest bones(so far) found in Africa. These bones they found were NOT An African's skeleton! This common ancestor was not African, Caucasian, Asian, or any other race. We seperated and evolved seperately.

To say you were first is just silly.
Tim John

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jun 24, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NOT FIRST wrote:
<quoted text>
We all came from a common ancestor. Noone knows for sure what this ancestor looked like exactly.This theory is based solely on the oldest bones(so far) found in Africa. These bones they found were NOT An African's skeleton! This common ancestor was not African, Caucasian, Asian, or any other race. We seperated and evolved seperately.
To say you were first is just silly.
RMAO, yeah, what ever say boss

Can you read?... here:

Homo erectus was apparently very successful, considering that fossils of the species have been found in Africa, Asia (Indonesia and China), and Georgia (Caucasus region of Europe)(Mayr 2001). It is considered to be the first hominid to spread out of Africa. The differences between the early populations of H. erectus in Africa and the later populations found in Asia, Europe,

These people were lived alone the equator with Black skin, the were early Blacks, for which Asians and Whites and etc can about.
Tim John

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jun 24, 2008
 
For Whites that are mad, please contact the Smithsonian and fill out a complaint with the. LOL

Educated people like myself already know your history.
Tim John

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jun 24, 2008
 
For those with sense this makes perfect sense Homo erectus lived alone the equator in Africa, they wouldn't have had dark skin pigmentation and then went to yellow and white and then back to brown and black. Their skin was brown and black so as to deal with the Sun. Whites skin came much later.
Tim John

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jun 24, 2008
 

Judged:

1

Homo erectus ("upright man") is an extinct species of the genus Homo. It lived from about 1.8 million years ago (mya) to 50-70,000 years ago. However, often the early phase, from 1.8 to 1.25 (or 1.6) mya, is considered to be a separate species, Homo ergaster, or it is seen as a subspecies of H. erectus, Homo erectus ergaster (Mayr 2001). Although H. erectus was originally believed to have disappeared roughly 400,000 years ago, the dating of deposits thought to contain H. erectus fossils in Java were placed at only 50,000 years ago, meaning that at least one population would have been a contemporary of modern humans (Smithsonian 2007a).

Fossil findings of early hominids is often fragmentary and inferences speculative, and although fossils of Homo erectus are much more common and complete than those of Homo habilis, researchers are not even sure into how many species the fossils can be placed. Nonetheless, it is clear that Homo erectus was a major stage in the history of human evolution. Just as in the stage-by-stage development of individuals (egg, baby, child, adolescent, adult) and the history of life on Earth (Precambrian, Cambrian, Ordovician, etc.), Homo erectus served as a foundation for subsequent stages, and it is considered to have given rise to Neandertals and Homo sapiens (Mayr 2001). H. erectus is thought to have been the first human ancestor to walk truly upright.

Homo erectus was apparently very successful, considering that fossils of the species have been found in Africa, Asia (Indonesia and China), and Georgia (Caucasus region of Europe)(Mayr 2001). It is considered to be the first hominid to spread out of Africa. The differences between the early populations of H. erectus in Africa and the later populations found in Asia, Europe, and Africa are substantial enough for the separation by many researchers into the early African H. ergaster and the mainly Asian populations H. erectus (Smithsonian 2007b).

H. erectus remains an important hominin since it is believed to be the first to leave Africa. In addition H. erectus was the first human ancestor to walk truly upright, which was made possible by the development of locking knees and a different location for the foramen magnum (the hole in the skull where the spine enters). They may have used fire to cook their meat. However, some scholars believe that H. erectus is an evolutionary lineage too derived—that is, too advanced—to have been the ancestor to modern H. sapiens.

Have any more complaints about the fact that Home Erecutus who lived alone the 'equator' which mean they had brown and black pigmentation, was YOUR ancestor, call the schalors and doctors at the Smithsonian and file your concerns with them.

Homo Erectus was early Black Africans, before all other races on this Planet.

Whites with hate, contact the Smithsonian with your concerns.
john galt

Waukegan, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jun 25, 2008
 

Judged:

4

4

2

everyone agrees,Negros are a more primitive form of life than whites....closer to apes.Its obvious by looking

Since: May 07

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jun 25, 2008
 

Judged:

1

john galt wrote:
everyone agrees,Negros are a more primitive form of life than whites....closer to apes.Its obvious by looking
Prove to me that race exists since you said that. I'm waiting for a response..........
john galt

Waukegan, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Jul 3, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

Mack the Great wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove to me that race exists since you said that. I'm waiting for a response..........
I can prove it very quickly...retard.By your pic its obvious you are a NEGRO.....owned

“SIGILLUM SECRETUM”

Since: Jun 08

City of the docks

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Jul 3, 2008
 
john galt wrote:
everyone agrees,Negros are a more primitive form of life than whites....closer to apes.Its obvious by looking
Oh, I see that is why some of you folks are so hairy all over your body?

Since: Jul 08

Southmayd, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Jul 3, 2008
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Tim John wrote:
<quoted text>
RMAO, yeah, what ever say boss
Can you read?... here:
Homo erectus was apparently very successful, considering that fossils of the species have been found in Africa, Asia (Indonesia and China), and Georgia (Caucasus region of Europe)(Mayr 2001). It is considered to be the first hominid to spread out of Africa. The differences between the early populations of H. erectus in Africa and the later populations found in Asia, Europe,
These people were lived alone the equator with Black skin, the were early Blacks, for which Asians and Whites and etc can about.
There are beginning to be other theories:

Mungo Man

Turning evolution upside down

In 1974, the discovery of Mungo Man turned the conventional theory of human evolution upside-down. Mungo Man was a human-like primate who is estimated to have died 62,000 years ago, and was ritually buried with his hands covering his penis. Anatomically, Mungo Man's bones were distinct from other human skeletons being unearthed in Australia. Unlike the younger skeletons that had big-brows, and thick-skulls, Mungo Man's skeleton was finer, and more like modern humans. The ANU's John Curtin School of Medical Research found that Mungo Man's skeleton's contained a small section of mitochondrial DNA. After analysing the DNA, the school found that Mungo Man's DNA bore no similarity to the other ancient skeletons, modern Aborigines and modern Europeans. Furthermore, his mitochondrial DNA has now become instinct. The results call into question the 'Out of Africa' theory of Human evolution. If Mungo Man was descended from a person who had left Africa in the past 200,000 years, then his mitochondrial DNA should have looked like all of the other samples.

Aside from undermining the Out of Africa theory of evolution, Mungo Man also undermined migration theories to Australia. Early theories proposed that the first humans in Australia were the "negrito" Tasmanian people, who were displaced by "Murrayans", who were in turn displaced by "Carpentarians". For ideological reasons, these theories gave way to a single migration theory that proposed that there was only ever one migration to Australia and all Aborigines are the descendents from that one migration. Although Mungo Man was dissimilar to 10,000-year-old robust skeletons being found in Australia, his bone structure was similar to modern day Aborigines. Multiple migrations helped explain the variance in skeletons.

oOoO

Punta Gorda, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jul 5, 2008
 
You might want to check this out
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw...
It's on
amazon.com "Erectus Walks Among Us."
The ancestor(s) of modern humans were not any of the races we see around today. Anyone that doesn't know that is a moron. Skin color changes due to adaptations, but skin color is NOT the thing that determins whether or not a skull is Negro of non-Negro. Skin color is irrelevant. The bones tell the story, the skull tells the story. This used to be widely known in anthro circles but political correctness forces even science to keep silent about certain things.
Check out Richard Lynn's book on Genes, too.
White Pyramid Hat

Penetanguishene, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Dec 15, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

You know the truth about blacks being very similar to Homo erectus is true when, the average black person in here tries so hard to say they're the same as whites lol. To even say your on the same brain level as us is a joke in itself. Any human being can mimic Neuro patterns if they're surrounded by a majority of that culture or race. For example, if a black male was to grow up in a white majority neighbourhood, he would pick up on white culture and ways. If that neighbourhood was to be over ran by blacks, it would go back in time and not forward, which we see happen through out the globe everyday, Compton is a perfect example. The Nordic Blood line is the newest DNA on the planet and it shows, Germany, Switzerland, Britan, Ireland are all Aryan/Nordic blood lines. Them being white majority they magically control the world, invent everything, peaceful(until 3rd worlds mass immigrated to certain areas). The fact is, you can sit here all day and pretend your like us, but deep down you know your not and never will be until you evolve like us. You ancestors would have had to live in harsh winter climates for thousands of years and survive in order to be us. If you want evidence on this, grab a book on chromagnum man, or wiki pedia nordic/aryan. You will find your answer if you really want to, but we all know that your going to sit here and try to convince me otherwise. If there was a war between races, we already know who would win every time. It's not about numbers, it's about knowledge and working together fluidly. Thats something majority of the world doesn't understand and never will.
Laura

Wynnum, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jan 11, 2009
 

Judged:

1

White Pyramid Hat wrote:
You know the truth about blacks being very similar to Homo erectus is true when, the average black person in here tries so hard to say they're the same as whites lol. To even say your on the same brain level as us is a joke in itself. Any human being can mimic Neuro patterns if they're surrounded by a majority of that culture or race. For example, if a black male was to grow up in a white majority neighbourhood, he would pick up on white culture and ways. If that neighbourhood was to be over ran by blacks, it would go back in time and not forward, which we see happen through out the globe everyday, Compton is a perfect example. The Nordic Blood line is the newest DNA on the planet and it shows, Germany, Switzerland, Britan, Ireland are all Aryan/Nordic blood lines. Them being white majority they magically control the world, invent everything, peaceful(until 3rd worlds mass immigrated to certain areas). The fact is, you can sit here all day and pretend your like us, but deep down you know your not and never will be until you evolve like us. You ancestors would have had to live in harsh winter climates for thousands of years and survive in order to be us. If you want evidence on this, grab a book on chromagnum man, or wiki pedia nordic/aryan. You will find your answer if you really want to, but we all know that your going to sit here and try to convince me otherwise. If there was a war between races, we already know who would win every time. It's not about numbers, it's about knowledge and working together fluidly. Thats something majority of the world doesn't understand and never will.
Aside from anything else, you are racist. Your views on evolution are warped, get a real education, then come back and argue why black and white people arent equal.
Sinajuavi

Morgantown, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jan 11, 2009
 
Homo erectus was long before anything looking like a modern "black" or other human.

And your info is out of date. Homo erectus gave rise to Homo heidelbergensis in southern Asia, western Eurasia and Africa. From this species arose 2 species, neandertalensis in the Mideast, Europe and central Asia, and sapiens in Ethiopia, who then spread into the rest of Africa and southwestern Eurasia, before the extinction of 72,000 years ago killed them off except in Africa, where small numbers remained.

Today, the khoisan-twa types of humans (Lo-L1) represent a type present over 100,000 years ago. They are the oldest living sort of human. The type of Homo sapiens which lived 200,000 years ago was far different from anyone living. The original Homo sapiens did NOT resemble modern blacks, whites or anyone else.

70,000 years ago, from some of this handful of survivors, in Ethiopia, evolved the modern types, of several, 2 of them which proliferated, being the Saharan (W Afr-Bantu) and the Ethiopioid (NE Africans plus Eurasians and everyone else).

The original common ancestor of white and black people, so-called, would have been one of those early survivors in Ethiopia. They would have been lighter than modern Saharans, but darker than most modern Eurasians except in the south.

The facts confound racists, black or white.
Jari

San Antonio, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Jan 12, 2009
 
Hey sinajuavi..do you have any links, articles or books to reccomend on your fact...plese
bugggy48

Waukegan, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Jan 12, 2009
 
Tim John wrote:
Homo erectus ("upright man") is an extinct species of the genus Homo. It lived from about 1.8 million years ago (mya) to 50-70,000 years ago. However, often the early phase, from 1.8 to 1.25 (or 1.6) mya, is considered to be a separate species, Homo ergaster, or it is seen as a subspecies of H. erectus, Homo erectus ergaster (Mayr 2001). Although H. erectus was originally believed to have disappeared roughly 400,000 years ago, the dating of deposits thought to contain H. erectus fossils in Java were placed at only 50,000 years ago, meaning that at least one population would have been a contemporary of modern humans (Smithsonian 2007a).
Fossil findings of early hominids is often fragmentary and inferences speculative, and although fossils of Homo erectus are much more common and complete than those of Homo habilis, researchers are not even sure into how many species the fossils can be placed. Nonetheless, it is clear that Homo erectus was a major stage in the history of human evolution. Just as in the stage-by-stage development of individuals (egg, baby, child, adolescent, adult) and the history of life on Earth (Precambrian, Cambrian, Ordovician, etc.), Homo erectus served as a foundation for subsequent stages, and it is considered to have given rise to Neandertals and Homo sapiens (Mayr 2001). H. erectus is thought to have been the first human ancestor to walk truly upright.
Homo erectus was apparently very successful, considering that fossils of the species have been found in Africa, Asia (Indonesia and China), and Georgia (Caucasus region of Europe)(Mayr 2001). It is considered to be the first hominid to spread out of Africa. The differences between the early populations of H. erectus in Africa and the later populations found in Asia, Europe, and Africa are substantial enough for the separation by many researchers into the early African H. ergaster and the mainly Asian populations H. erectus (Smithsonian 2007b).
H. erectus remains an important hominin since it is believed to be the first to leave Africa. In addition H. erectus was the first human ancestor to walk truly upright, which was made possible by the development of locking knees and a different location for the foramen magnum (the hole in the skull where the spine enters). They may have used fire to cook their meat. However, some scholars believe that H. erectus is an evolutionary lineage too derived—that is, too advanced—to have been the ancestor to modern H. sapiens.
Have any more complaints about the fact that Home Erecutus who lived alone the 'equator' which mean they had brown and black pigmentation, was YOUR ancestor, call the schalors and doctors at the Smithsonian and file your concerns with them.
Homo Erectus was early Black Africans, before all other races on this Planet.
Whites with hate, contact the Smithsonian with your concerns.
.
..Tim,i dont know what youre trying to say with all this but being first in evolution does not mean better .Evolution has followed a track of the simpler comes first followed by the more complex,intricate and more adapted coming later.
As for being recessive,its always harder to make something intricate and refined than to make something simpler.Its a law of thermodynamics.The more order in a system the more energy required.If you need google "entropy"
xemola aha

Copenhagen, Denmark

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jan 19, 2009
 
john galt wrote:
everyone agrees,Negros are a more primitive form of life than whites....closer to apes.Its obvious by looking
Man you are crazy, I am living in the sacandinavian isle where the whitest people are living in the world and they dont even agree with you!
Your just stuck in your American bubble!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of34
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••