“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#93033 Mar 20, 2014
JOHNS ON TOP OF IT wrote:
---------- HAM -(cham; Cham)---------
1. The Youngest Son of Noah:
The youngest son of Noah, from whom sprang the western and southwestern nations known to the Hebrews. His name first occurs in Genesis 5:32, where, as in 6:10 and elsewhere, it occupies the second place. In Genesis 9:18 Ham is described as "the father of Canaan".
2. Ham as a Nationality (30 Nations came out of Ham): 
The name given, in Psalms 105:23,17; 106:22 (compare 78:51), to Egypt as a descendant of Ham, son of Noah. As Shem means "dusky," or the like, and Japheth "fair," it has been supposed that Ham meant, as is not improbable, "black." This is supported by the evidence of Hebrew and Arabic, in which the word chamam means "to be hot" and "to be black," the latter signification being derived from the former. 
It is interesting to note that the Biblical record defines Egypt as the Land of Ham. 
-- Psalm 105: 23 "Israel also came into Egypt...the land of Ham."
3. Meaning of the Word: 
That Ham is connected with the native name of Egypt, Kem, or, in full pa ta' en Kem, "the land of Egypt," in Bashmurian Coptic Kheme, is unlikely, as this form is probably of a much later date than the composition of Gen, and, moreover, as the Arabic shows, the guttural is not a true kh, but the hard breathing h, which are both represented by the Hebrew cheth.
4. The Nations Descending from Ham: 
First on the list, as being the darkest, is Cush or Ethiopia (Genesis 10:6), after which comes Mitsrayim, or Egypt, then PuT or Libyia, and Canaan last. The sons or descendants of each of these are then taken in turn, and it is noteworthy that some of them, like the Ethiopians and the Canaanites, spoke Semitic, and not Hamitic, languages--Seba (if connected with the Sabeans), Havilah (Yemen), and Sheba, whose queen visited Solomon. Professor Sayce, moreover, has pointed out that Caphtor is the original home of the Phoenicians, who spoke a Semitic language. 
The explanation of this probably is that other tongues were forced upon these nationalities in consequence of their migrations, or because they fell under the dominion of nationalities alien to them. The non-Sem Babylonians, described as descendants of Nimrod (Merodach), as is well known, spoke Sumerian, and adopted Semitic Babylonian only on account of mingling with the Semites whom they found there. 
Another explanation is that the nationalities described as Hamitic--a parallel to those of the Semitic section--were so called because they fell under Egyptian dominion. This would make the original Hamitic race to have been Egyptian and account for Ham as a (poetical) designation of that nationality. Professor F. L. Griffith has pointed out that the Egyptian Priapic god of Panopolis (Akhmim), sometimes called Menu, but also apparently known as Khem, may have been identified with the ancestor of the Hamitic race--he was worshipped from the coast of the Red Sea to Coptos, and must have been well known to Egypt's eastern neighbors. He regards the characteristics of Menu as being in accord with the shamelessness of Ham as recorded in Genesis 9:20.
4. Four Sons of Ham (see map below):
    1. Mizraim (Egypt)
   2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
   3. Put (Lybia)
   4. Canaan (Hivites, Jebusites, Arvadites, Girgashites, Amorites, Arkites, Sinites, Hittites, 
           Sidonians, Perizzites, Zemarites)
BIBLEGATEWAY, com
All truth and Nazis hate it.

Bible.com
Indian guy

Westminster, CA

#93034 Mar 20, 2014
Identity wrote:
I bet you can't dispute that information....hahaha dummy
Indians are lived light or dark also. So I could not understand black racism issues
Your the Idiot

Westminster, CA

#93035 Mar 20, 2014
Ben YISRAEL wrote:
The New Testament Tradition, During the first phase (c. 90 CE-96 CE)Christian church discovered that Christ had not yet returned as predicted, but the generation of the apostles and those who had directly encountered Christ was rapidly dying out. Originally, knowledge of Christ had been transmitted orally. At this point, the church fathers wrote down the early Gospels and preserved the Pauline letters as ways to give pastoral guidance to new churches.where was the school at?The Gospel of Mark was written first. Scholars date it most commonly to circa 70 CE--the year year Titus and his Roman armies destroyed Jerusalem. Mark is generally (though not universally) thought to be the oldest of the Gospels, with the others appearing in later decades after the year 70 CE, about sixty to a hundred years after Jesus' crucifixion.It was at Jamnia in the famous school of Johanan ben Zakkai that the council met about A.D. 90 to decide which books belonged to the canon. Pointing, no doubt, to the actual rolls brought from the Temple, the scribes and learned men of the council argued the merits of the various books. A Johanan ben Zakkai was one of the tannaim, an important Jewish sage in the era of the Second Temple, and a primary contributor to the core text of Rabbinical Judaism, 70 AD most of the books of the New Testament were written and in full use. By 96 AD, the last book of the New Testament was written. wasnt no hebrews in the land jews wrote them books for romans that was trying to get they NERGEL demi-god coming back to life off the grounds them 45 book the wasnt enough they couldnt start a religion wit the same old testament them jews had! so in comes the new testament!look up Koine bible first newtestament Koine bible look it up they snicked NERGEL in on everybody that worship the demi-god jez-us or the hebrew name you can try fit to him, the CREATOR said HE would just for give our sin. like Remember it no mo HE never said nothing bout his son dying for us, after geting our heritage blotted out an beat down for 400 years that would be enough as it is this day, that lil boy dying for sin coming back to life is death worship, the god of war, Magog wicked tail is tied into all that, plus the qween of heaven, that demi-god mess got so much wickedness to it it over evil, i see that evil wicked mess, you peoples better wake up you been studying long enough to see, dude jewish trying to subvert he will your doing good if he see your not pushing bible hahahah lol ya'll play so many game i been seen whats going on im doing this to let ya'll knows i peep an been peep game, everybody can go back to sleep- after this lol hahahah
Your post are delusional Learn howcto read then learn some real history indoor. You post a lot of lies
Your the Idiot

Westminster, CA

#93036 Mar 20, 2014
Indian guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Indians are lived light or dark also. So I could not understand black racism issues
Indians no matter the skin tone are loved. Yes it's hard to understand racism the
A CHILD OF AHAYA

Atlanta, GA

#93037 Mar 20, 2014
Indian guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Indians are lived light or dark also. So I could not understand black racism issues
Lol , you are a troll in disguise , begone????
A CHILD OF AHAYA

Atlanta, GA

#93038 Mar 20, 2014
Your the Idiot wrote:
<quoted text>
Indians no matter the skin tone are loved. Yes it's hard to understand racism the
lol , welcome to our world , as in all of mankind!!!
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#93039 Mar 20, 2014
" Classical Greek historians, including Strabo, Diodorus Siculus, and
Herodotus were pretty clear that black people ruled the middle east and
africa. The ancient Hebrews who were black people married women from the
sons of ham.
The ancient Hebrews had dreadlocks Google "ancient Hebrews" or"
ancient Hebrew dreadlocks." then click images and see what what you get.
Go read genesis ten and then show me where white people in are genesis "

-dreamhunk, Calgary, Canada
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#93040 Mar 20, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
" Classical Greek historians, including Strabo, Diodorus Siculus, and
Herodotus were pretty clear that black people ruled the middle east and
africa. The ancient Hebrews who were black people married women from the
sons of ham.
The ancient Hebrews had dreadlocks Google "ancient Hebrews" or"
ancient Hebrew dreadlocks." then click images and see what what you get.
Go read genesis ten and then show me where white people in are genesis "
-dreamhunk, Calgary, Canada
Would you believe Herodotus if you saw this map he drew?????LOL
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Herodotus_world_ma...
Would you believe anything Strabo said if you saw the map he drew:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:C%2BB-Geography-Ma...
The TORAH says King Solomon was WHITE:
SONG OF SOLOMON 5:10
My beloved is white and ruddy the chiefest among ten thousand
REAL HEBREWS RECREATED BY FORENSIC EXPERTS using REAL skulls:
www.timesofisrael.com/meet-delilah-tv-series-...
Samaritans have lived over 3000 years in Israel and are related to the ISRAELITES:
www.israelite-samaritans.com
ANCIENT CHALDEANS (Abrahams people) portrayed themselves as WHITE:
www.penn.museum/sites/Iraq/...
So were the people of the Middle East and the Hebrews ever black?????HELL NO! AFRONAZI RACIST RUBBISH AS USUAL!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#93041 Mar 20, 2014
JOHNS ON TOP OF IT wrote:
---------- HAM -(cham; Cham)---------
1. The Youngest Son of Noah:
The youngest son of Noah, from whom sprang the western and southwestern nations known to the Hebrews. His name first occurs in Genesis 5:32, where, as in 6:10 and elsewhere, it occupies the second place. In Genesis 9:18 Ham is described as "the father of Canaan".
2. Ham as a Nationality (30 Nations came out of Ham): 
The name given, in Psalms 105:23,17; 106:22 (compare 78:51), to Egypt as a descendant of Ham, son of Noah. As Shem means "dusky," or the like, and Japheth "fair," it has been supposed that Ham meant, as is not improbable, "black." This is supported by the evidence of Hebrew and Arabic, in which the word chamam means "to be hot" and "to be black," the latter signification being derived from the former. 
It is interesting to note that the Biblical record defines Egypt as the Land of Ham. 
-- Psalm 105: 23 "Israel also came into Egypt...the land of Ham."
3. Meaning of the Word: 
That Ham is connected with the native name of Egypt, Kem, or, in full pa ta' en Kem, "the land of Egypt," in Bashmurian Coptic Kheme, is unlikely, as this form is probably of a much later date than the composition of Gen, and, moreover, as the Arabic shows, the guttural is not a true kh, but the hard breathing h, which are both represented by the Hebrew cheth.
4. The Nations Descending from Ham: 
First on the list, as being the darkest, is Cush or Ethiopia (Genesis 10:6), after which comes Mitsrayim, or Egypt, then PuT or Libyia, and Canaan last. The sons or descendants of each of these are then taken in turn, and it is noteworthy that some of them, like the Ethiopians and the Canaanites, spoke Semitic, and not Hamitic, languages--Seba (if connected with the Sabeans), Havilah (Yemen), and Sheba, whose queen visited Solomon. Professor Sayce, moreover, has pointed out that Caphtor is the original home of the Phoenicians, who spoke a Semitic language. 
The explanation of this probably is that other tongues were forced upon these nationalities in consequence of their migrations, or because they fell under the dominion of nationalities alien to them. The non-Sem Babylonians, described as descendants of Nimrod (Merodach), as is well known, spoke Sumerian, and adopted Semitic Babylonian only on account of mingling with the Semites whom they found there. 
Another explanation is that the nationalities described as Hamitic--a parallel to those of the Semitic section--were so called because they fell under Egyptian dominion. This would make the original Hamitic race to have been Egyptian and account for Ham as a (poetical) designation of that nationality. Professor F. L. Griffith has pointed out that the Egyptian Priapic god of Panopolis (Akhmim), sometimes called Menu, but also apparently known as Khem, may have been identified with the ancestor of the Hamitic race--he was worshipped from the coast of the Red Sea to Coptos, and must have been well known to Egypt's eastern neighbors. He regards the characteristics of Menu as being in accord with the shamelessness of Ham as recorded in Genesis 9:20.
4. Four Sons of Ham (see map below):
    1. Mizraim (Egypt)
   2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
   3. Put (Lybia)
   4. Canaan (Hivites, Jebusites, Arvadites, Girgashites, Amorites, Arkites, Sinites, Hittites, 
           Sidonians, Perizzites, Zemarites)
BIBLEGATEWAY, com
Um.....Libyans were portrayed on ancient Egyptian walls as WHITE:
www.takenote.it/blog/...
So were some Egyptians portrayed as WHITE as were Middle Eastern people!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#93042 Mar 20, 2014
A CHILD OF AHAYAH wrote:
Lol , since this is a historical figure and clearly stated that the Jews in 70 AD were of Ethiopian descent????? Then that makes you trolls nothing more than pathological liars and your feeble attempts at historical theft pathetic??????? Portrait bust of Titus © Titus was the 10th emperor of Rome. His short reign was notable for the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 AD and the opening of the Colosseum in 80 AD.
Titus Flavius Vespasianus was born in Rome on 30 December 39 AD, the elder son of the future Emperor Vespasian. He was brought up in the court of Emperor Claudius as a companion to the emperor's son, Britannicus. Titus enjoyed a successful military career and in 67 AD went with his father to suppress the Jewish Revolt. In 69 AD, Vespasian returned to Rome to assert his claim for the imperial throne, leaving Titus to continue the campaign. In 70 AD, Jerusalem was sacked, the Jewish temple was destroyed and much of the population killed or dispersed.
When Titus returned to Rome, Vespasian groomed him for the succession, sharing his powers with him to an unprecedented degree. Titus succeeded his father in 79 AD, and continued his policies. He enjoyed excellent relations with the Senate and was popular with the people for the lavish games he put on. The Colosseum was opened in 80 AD.
He responded generously with disaster relief after the eruption of Vesuvius, which occurred two months into his reign, and after a serious fire and a plague at Rome in 80 AD. Titus died on 13 September 81 AD, probably from natural causes, although Domitian, who succeeded him, was suspected of having poisoned him.
TACITUS NOT TITUS you low IQ imbecile! HE WAS A JEW HATER and his rubbish goes against the TORAH!
King Solomon was a WHITE MAN
Song of Solomon 5:10
My beloved is WHITE AND RUDDY the chiefest among ten thousand

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#93043 Mar 20, 2014
African AE wrote:
THE TORAH states that KING SOLOMON was WHITE:
Song of Solomon 5:10
My beloved is WHITE and RUDDY
King David is described as RUDDY with a FAIR countenance
1 Samuel 17:42
Esau is described as RED AND HAIRY
Genesis 25:25
ADAM means RED in HEBREW
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam
So NOPE they are luckily NOT related to ugly Ethiopians who are black Africans related to West Africans!
ISRAELITES BUTCHER ETHIOPIANS:
www.keyway.ca/htm2001/20010315.htm
If our look is related to west Africans, it actually doesn't matter for us. All what we need is to prove that the fore-fathers of todays current Ethiopian Semites are actually the Akkad of the ancient as supported by linguistic studies, i.e our beloved father Abraham, and King David (via his great grand mother Ruth), Mosses (Via his wife Zipporah), King Solomon (Via his beloved son Minilik I), as supported by various archeological, genetic, scripture and cultural evidences that no other people can ever have...to my knowledge.

Again, if we Ethiopians are genetically and historically the same, then it is your duty to accept all what they claim, for we Ethiopian Semites do have abundant and excessive evidences supporting our claim. It is not a simple task to push Ethiopians forget their claims that they have been celebrating it for over 2,000 years. It is plane futile and we also believe not only all biblical figures are Ethiopians but also Ethiopia is an extension of the ancient Israel. The blood of ancient Israelite in full and unmixed is no where but within the Ethiopian Semites (Save some Arabs from the south). You are trying to push the mountain or attempting to reach the sky. I know there are many things that you don't know about Ethiopians and their ancient history. It is just futile. Crying ignorant Cape Malay!

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#93044 Mar 20, 2014
JOHNS ON TOP OF IT wrote:
---------- HAM -(cham; Cham)---------
1. The Youngest Son of Noah:
The youngest son of Noah, from whom sprang the western and southwestern nations known to the Hebrews. His name first occurs in Genesis 5:32, where, as in 6:10 and elsewhere, it occupies the second place. In Genesis 9:18 Ham is described as "the father of Canaan".
2. Ham as a Nationality (30 Nations came out of Ham): 
The name given, in Psalms 105:23,17; 106:22 (compare 78:51), to Egypt as a descendant of Ham, son of Noah. As Shem means "dusky," or the like, and Japheth "fair," it has been supposed that Ham meant, as is not improbable, "black." This is supported by the evidence of Hebrew and Arabic, in which the word chamam means "to be hot" and "to be black," the latter signification being derived from the former. 
It is interesting to note that the Biblical record defines Egypt as the Land of Ham. 
-- Psalm 105: 23 "Israel also came into Egypt...the land of Ham."
3. Meaning of the Word: 
That Ham is connected with the native name of Egypt, Kem, or, in full pa ta' en Kem, "the land of Egypt," in Bashmurian Coptic Kheme, is unlikely, as this form is probably of a much later date than the composition of Gen, and, moreover, as the Arabic shows, the guttural is not a true kh, but the hard breathing h, which are both represented by the Hebrew cheth.
4. The Nations Descending from Ham: 
First on the list, as being the darkest, is Cush or Ethiopia (Genesis 10:6), after which comes Mitsrayim, or Egypt, then PuT or Libyia, and Canaan last. The sons or descendants of each of these are then taken in turn, and it is noteworthy that some of them, like the Ethiopians and the Canaanites, spoke Semitic, and not Hamitic, languages--Seba (if connected with the Sabeans), Havilah (Yemen), and Sheba, whose queen visited Solomon. Professor Sayce, moreover, has pointed out that Caphtor is the original home of the Phoenicians, who spoke a Semitic language. 
The explanation of this probably is that other tongues were forced upon these nationalities in consequence of their migrations, or because they fell under the dominion of nationalities alien to them. The non-Sem Babylonians, described as descendants of Nimrod (Merodach), as is well known, spoke Sumerian, and adopted Semitic Babylonian only on account of mingling with the Semites whom they found there. 
Another explanation is that the nationalities described as Hamitic--a parallel to those of the Semitic section--were so called because they fell under Egyptian dominion. This would make the original Hamitic race to have been Egyptian and account for Ham as a (poetical) designation of that nationality. Professor F. L. Griffith has pointed out that the Egyptian Priapic god of Panopolis (Akhmim), sometimes called Menu, but also apparently known as Khem, may have been identified with the ancestor of the Hamitic race--he was worshipped from the coast of the Red Sea to Coptos, and must have been well known to Egypt's eastern neighbors. He regards the characteristics of Menu as being in accord with the shamelessness of Ham as recorded in Genesis 9:20.
4. Four Sons of Ham (see map below):
    1. Mizraim (Egypt)
   2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
   3. Put (Lybia)
   4. Canaan (Hivites, Jebusites, Arvadites, Girgashites, Amorites, Arkites, Sinites, Hittites, 
           Sidonians, Perizzites, Zemarites)
BIBLEGATEWAY, com
Nothing wrong in this post, except it missed to include the latter Hebrews in the list as descendants of ancient Canaanites, after the coming of Abraham., i.e Hebrews are Hamites that later spoke Semitic. Semites are Semitic speaking but culturally and genetically Hamites, that followed Abraham's teaching for their conversion. There was no more significant diffrence between the two. Yet, that beach debate loving Cape Malay gave you wrong and nut as usual. Do you care about that?
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#93045 Mar 20, 2014
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
If our look is related to west Africans, it actually doesn't matter for us. All what we need is to prove that the fore-fathers of todays current Ethiopian Semites are actually the Akkad of the ancient as supported by linguistic studies, i.e our beloved father Abraham, and King David (via his great grand mother Ruth), Mosses (Via his wife Zipporah), King Solomon (Via his beloved son Minilik I), as supported by various archeological, genetic, scripture and cultural evidences that no other people can ever have...to my knowledge.
Again, if we Ethiopians are genetically and historically the same, then it is your duty to accept all what they claim, for we Ethiopian Semites do have abundant and excessive evidences supporting our claim. It is not a simple task to push Ethiopians forget their claims that they have been celebrating it for over 2,000 years. It is plane futile and we also believe not only all biblical figures are Ethiopians but also Ethiopia is an extension of the ancient Israel. The blood of ancient Israelite in full and unmixed is no where but within the Ethiopian Semites (Save some Arabs from the south). You are trying to push the mountain or attempting to reach the sky. I know there are many things that you don't know about Ethiopians and their ancient history. It is just futile. Crying ignorant Cape Malay!
Once again YAWN.......ETHIOPIANS ARE BLACK AFRICANS MUCH MUCH MORE RELATED TO SUB-SAHARAN AFRICANS than anyone else! The J that Ethiopians carry comes from ARABS!
ISRAELITES BUTCHER AND MAKE A BLOOD BATH OF ETHIOPIANS LOL
www.keyway.ca/htm2001/20010315.htm
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#93046 Mar 20, 2014
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing wrong in this post, except it missed to include the latter Hebrews in the list as descendants of ancient Canaanites, after the coming of Abraham., i.e Hebrews are Hamites that later spoke Semitic. Semites are Semitic speaking but culturally and genetically Hamites, that followed Abraham's teaching for their conversion. There was no more significant diffrence between the two. Yet, that beach debate loving Cape Malay gave you wrong and nut as usual. Do you care about that?
....HEBREWS WERE SHEMITES From UR in the CHALDEANS!
Ancient CHALDEANS PAINT THEMSELVES WHITE:
www.penn.museum/sites/Iraq/...
Ancient Canaanites portrayed as WHITE on Egyptian walls:
www.dqhall.com/Abraham_in_Egypt/

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#93047 Mar 21, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>....HEBREWS WERE SHEMITES From UR in the CHALDEANS!
Ancient CHALDEANS PAINT THEMSELVES WHITE:
www.penn.museum/sites/Iraq/...
Ancient Canaanites portrayed as WHITE on Egyptian walls:
www.dqhall.com/Abraham_in_Egypt/
Thank you for presenting more evidences supporting my claim. Right! we know the Chaldeans were called 'Black headed' and Akkad was the home of ancient Cushites, such as Nimroid and their ancient Semitic language is much similar with Ethiopian Geez. The Nile vally and Akkad was just one home with their African Donkey. Was Akkad closed to Germany or Poland? Drinking old bitch cape slave!!

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#93048 Mar 21, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>TACITUS NOT TITUS you low IQ imbecile! HE WAS A JEW HATER and his rubbish goes against the TORAH!
King Solomon was a WHITE MAN
Song of Solomon 5:10
My beloved is WHITE AND RUDDY the chiefest among ten thousand
White man, as understood by the world at large today, never included the Arabs. It just referrs the Europeans that rearly went to the middle east, but more easily travelled to Africa and enslaved them, while all Africans preferred freedom, the Cape Malays loved the slavery and retained it. That is why Cape Malays know nothing but white, white, white, white.....

“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#93052 Mar 21, 2014
Whet you. Serpents are suffering from is called denialism!!! and here are all of the different definitions of your mental brainless condition.

de·ni·al
\di-&#712;n&#299;(- &#601;)l, d&#275;-\
noun
: a statement saying that something is not true or real : a statement in which someone denies something
psychology : a condition in which someone will not admit that something sad, painful, etc., is true or real
: the act of not allowing someone to have something
Full Definition
1 :refusal to satisfy a request or desire
2 a (1):refusal to admit the truth or reality (as of a statement or charge)(2):assertion that an allegation is false
b :refusal to acknowledge a person or a thing :disavowal
3 :the opposing by the defendant of an allegation of the opposite party in a lawsuit
4 :self-denial
5 :negation in logic
6 :a psychological defense mechanism in which confrontation with a personal problem or with reality is avoided by denying the existence of the problem or reality
— in denial
:refusing to admit the truth or reality of something unpleasant <a patient in denial about his health problems>
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#93053 Mar 21, 2014
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
If our look is related to west Africans, it actually doesn't matter for us. All what we need is to prove that the fore-fathers of todays current Ethiopian Semites are actually the Akkad of the ancient as supported by linguistic studies, i.e our beloved father Abraham, and King David (via his great grand mother Ruth), Mosses (Via his wife Zipporah), King Solomon (Via his beloved son Minilik I), as supported by various archeological, genetic, scripture and cultural evidences that no other people can ever have...to my knowledge.
Again, if we Ethiopians are genetically and historically the same, then it is your duty to accept all what they claim, for we Ethiopian Semites do have abundant and excessive evidences supporting our claim. It is not a simple task to push Ethiopians forget their claims that they have been celebrating it for over 2,000 years. It is plane futile and we also believe not only all biblical figures are Ethiopians but also Ethiopia is an extension of the ancient Israel. The blood of ancient Israelite in full and unmixed is no where but within the Ethiopian Semites (Save some Arabs from the south). You are trying to push the mountain or attempting to reach the sky. I know there are many things that you don't know about Ethiopians and their ancient history. It is just futile. Crying ignorant Cape Malay!
THE racist bastard "alf" hates Africans including Ethiopians. That racist bastard SANCTIONS the killing of innocent Ethiopians.

Like someone else said here.....the day will come when that bastard will get a knock at his door and be taken away for being a racist traitor to Africa

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#93054 Mar 21, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Um.....Libyans were portrayed on ancient Egyptian walls as WHITE:
www.takenote.it/blog/...
So were some Egyptians portrayed as WHITE as were Middle Eastern people!
Moron ignorant stubborn one! Why are you allergic to understand science? Color has nothing to do with once identity, but the skeletal morphology. This has been told to you perhapps over 100X but it seems you have phobia to accept science. Read this:

http://phys.org/news202458278.html

You are just wasting your slave servicing time. Ninnyhammer Cape Malay! Your hard try is to deceivingly include light skinned Cape Malays in our Caucasoid race. According to your fool logic these are whites:

http://www.arogundade.com/diandra-forrest-alb...
https://www.google.com.et/search...
https://www.google.com.et/search...
https://www.google.com.et/search...
https://www.google.com.et/search...

And for you Cape Malays are whites, and hence do have the same root like Ethiopian Semites? Wrong!! Cape Malays do have n!groid skull and have nothing to do with the Ethiopians! Don't try it again and no one is fool except you.Hobbledehoy mumpsimus slave Cape Malay!
A Child of AHAYA

Absecon, NJ

#93055 Mar 21, 2014
JOHNS ON TOP OF IT wrote:
Whet you. Serpents are suffering from is called denialism!!! and here are all of the different definitions of your mental brainless condition.
de·ni·al
\di-&#712;n&#299;(- &#601;)l, d&#275;-\
noun
: a statement saying that something is not true or real : a statement in which someone denies something
psychology : a condition in which someone will not admit that something sad, painful, etc., is true or real
: the act of not allowing someone to have something
Full Definition
1 :refusal to satisfy a request or desire
2 a (1):refusal to admit the truth or reality (as of a statement or charge)(2):assertion that an allegation is false
b :refusal to acknowledge a person or a thing :disavowal
3 :the opposing by the defendant of an allegation of the opposite party in a lawsuit
4 :self-denial
5 :negation in logic
6 :a psychological defense mechanism in which confrontation with a personal problem or with reality is avoided by denying the existence of the problem or reality
— in denial
:refusing to admit the truth or reality of something unpleasant <a patient in denial about his health problems>
Lol , sounds like them for sure!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why do Afrocentrists obsess over Egypt and NON-... (Nov '12) 6 min Maro 7,698
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 9 min Maro 32,503
Are white women attracted to black men? (Aug '06) 10 min Kelly Sill 123,640
What music are you listening to right now? (Sep '08) 24 min Redefined 33,474
Will White Women Please Take Black Men 25 min Kelly Sill 280
Why did Mexico send an Olmec head to Ethiopia? (Oct '13) 29 min Curious Me 309
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 39 min shinningelectr0n 1,216,683
Latino Men are Sexier than black men. (Jan '13) 42 min Miguel is the man 727
Robert Mugabe is the greatest 2 hr Will E Lynch 16
Socialism has worked in several nations. ------... 3 hr Will E Lynch 8
More from around the web