Hebrew Israelite

Posted in the African-American Forum

Comments (Page 3,371)

Showing posts 67,401 - 67,420 of94,260
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Yeahman

Saddle Brook, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72828
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Ancient Semites/Europeans ARE RELATED! The Eurasian Middle Eastern Neolithic Farmers went into Europe bringing the skull shape and DNA to Europeans! Female Europeans and Middle Eastern women ARE EXTREMELY related by DNA and more than likely have the same shape skulls! 6000 year old people from nearby Jericho have EXACTLY the same DNA as modern Middle Eastern people! North Africans like Arabs are extremely mixed with Africans! Unless they are Jews they dont count!
What a joke.The descendats of Ja&#8242;pheth(Indo-Europe ans -germanic) want to be descendants of Shem (Semites)
trollslayer

Munster, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72829
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

JOHNS ON TOP OF IT wrote:
European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
2 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
3 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
4 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
5a European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
6 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
7 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
8 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
9 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
10 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
11 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
12 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
13 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
14 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
of course trolls never want to address the lies about African history
trollslayer

Munster, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72830
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Jealous ignorant self denying slave! I never wanted to look anything of the whites, you really do not know who Ethiopians are! We love our looks very very much and that is why every one is dreaming to look like Ethiopians (including you, the Cape Malay)
You so realize true Ethiopians have nothing to do with euros and that euros come from Ethiopians

“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72831
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Jealous ignorant self denying slave! I never wanted to look anything of the whites, you really do not know who Ethiopians are! We love our looks very very much and that is why every one is dreaming to look like Ethiopians (including you, the Cape Malay)

That is an exceedingly self serving statement!!!

Maybe the pahan has a desire to favor you, but i dont see anyone else expressing such nonsense. I most certainly wouldn't want to look like you!!! The fact that i do look slimilar is do to my heritage. But otherw, youre full of it . Thinking people want to look l i ke you. LLOL!!!
yeahman

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72832
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
You so realize true Ethiopians have nothing to do with euros and that euros come from Ethiopians
So euros now want to be negros> how confusing for them.pitifull

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72833
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
You so realize true Ethiopians have nothing to do with euros and that euros come from Ethiopians
You're not a Hebrew.
African AE

Durban, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72834
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
of course trolls never want to address the lies about African history
Load of Afronazi junk!
Yeahman

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72835
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Load of Afronazi junk!
How pathetic use of the word. In fact you reek of a foul smell.
Jeff

Marlborough, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72836
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorteMemnon wrote:
(quotes from "Our Darker Forefathers").
In the Irish annals the Black Vikings are called Dubh-Ghenti, or Black Gentiles. These Black Gentiles on some occasions fought against other plunderers of the Irish coasts known as the Fair Gentiles, who can hardly have been others than the fair Danes or Northmen. In the year 851 the Black Gentiles came to Athcliath i.e., Dublin. In 852 we are told that eight ships of the Finn-Ghenti arrived and fought against the Dubh-Ghenti for three days, and that the Dubh-Ghenti were victorious.
You are an Afrocentric lying dumbass who takes things out of context to promote whatever lies you want. Why don't you quote the beginning of Shore's work where he SPECIFICALLY states the descriptions found in his works are in reference to the different EYE, HAIR, etc colors found in Europeans and NOT in reference to any racially "black Africans", you self hating reject? Here you go, lying clown:

"One of the facts concerning the colour of the ---> HAIR and EYES <--- of the people in different counties of England at the present time." ~ Shore; "Our Darker Forefathers"

In other words, Shore is NOT claiming HIS and other Europeans "Darker Forefathers" were racially black Africans but Europeans of all types from blondes, to gingers to BRUNETTE aka WHITE folk, idiot. The passage from above is describing European aka white people, NOT racially black people like yourself. In other words Fair Europeans aka BLONDS also known as ---> NORDIC Teutonic <--- vs. Dark Europeans aka BRUNETTES also known as ---> Alpine, Mediterranean, Dinaric <--, NONE of these groups were ever racially black nor described as racially black cause they were NOT black. People back then called racially black people "N*******" and this term was NOT applied towards ANY Europeans and especially NORTHERN Europeans were black people did not have much of an existence, you stupid ass. From Shore's works:

"The typical old ---> TEUTONIC <--- skull is dolichocephalic, the skull of the British people of the Bronze Age in brachycephalic. The inference that there was a fusion of race between the Saxons and Angles and people descending from men of the Bronze Age is easily drawn. From what has been said of the presence of broadheaded people of a ---> BRUNETTE <---- type in parts of Norway, among the much more numerous long-headed people of a fair complexion who formed the bulk of the Norwegian nation. The same result is obtained by the study of the broad-headed people of Central Europe at the present day, the descendants presumably of the old ---> ALPINE <--- race."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpine_race

Sorry none of these Europeans were ever 'racially black' nor described as 'racially black'. They were as white as their modern descendants are today and ranged from blonds, to gingers to brunette Europeans do today, in other words all white folk,'GMooRon'.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
Jeff

Marlborough, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72837
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorteMemnon wrote:
Dodge Ball Game begin!
Saga of Thorfinn Karlsefne - 1007 A.D.
p. 218- 219
There was a man hight Thorvard; he married Freydis, a natural daughter of Erik the Red; he went also with them, and Thorvald the son of Erik, 1 and Thorhall who was called the hunter; he had long been with Erik, and served him as huntsman in summer and steward in winter; he was a large man, and strong, black and like a giant, silent and foul-mouthed in his speech.
Egil's Saga
Chapter 1
Kveldulf and his wife had two sons, the elder was named Thorolf, the younger Grim; these, when they grew up, were both tall men and strong, as was their father. But Thorolf was most comely as well as doughty, favoring his mother's kin; very cheery was he, liberal, impetuous in everything, a good trader, winning the hearts of all men. Grim was swarthy, ill- favoured, like his father both in face and mind.
You yet again show your ignorance. Vikings were never racially black, stupidass. These Europeans were among the fairest of all Euros. The descriptions were in reference to the different hair, eye, etc colors found in Europeans and NOT in reference to any racially "black Vikings" which never existed since black people never had much of any presence in the Vikings homelands. Erik the Red meant he was a GINGER, while Thorhall the Black meant he was a BRUNETTE, not 'racially' black. That is how Northern Europeans described one another, a Brunette European like Collin Farrell would have been know as "black" NOT because he was racially black but because of his BRUNETTE coloring, vs. a Red headed European like Erik the Red who was called RED NOT because he had red skin color but because he was a GINGER. Black people did not exist in Scandinavian countries, that is why these people have ZERO black admixture. Again people back then called racially black people "N*******" and this term was NOT applied towards ANY Europeans let alone NORTHERN Europeans who have no black admixture since black people did not have much of any presence in those regions.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
Jeff

Framingham, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72838
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorteMemnon wrote:
Egil's Saga
Chapter 55
Egil was large-featured, broad of forehead, with large eyebrows, a nose not long but very thick, lips wide and long, chin exceeding broad, as was all about the jaws; thick-necked was he, and big-shouldered beyond other men, hard-featured, and grim when angry. He was well-made, more than commonly tall, had hair wolf-gray and thick, but became early bald. He was black-eyed and brown-skinned.
Once yet,MooRon, Vikings were never racially black. The descriptions were in reference to the different hair, eye, etc colors found in Europeans, and NOT in reference to any racially "black Vikings". Black people did not exist in Scandinavian countries, that is why these people have ZERO black admixture, you self hating idiot. The description given above is for a Brunette European like Collin Farrell, NOT a freaken racially black person who 1) didn't exist in those European regions and 2) would have been called a "N*****" since that is the term used for racially black people back then, and that term was NEVER applied towards any Europeans.

"Application of the test to each West Eurasian population (using A = YRI and B = CEU) finds NO evidence of [African] mixture in North Europeans."
http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...
African AE

Durban, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72839
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Yeahman wrote:
<quoted text>How pathetic use of the word. In fact you reek of a foul smell.
Must be my new deoderant!
Jeff

Marlborough, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72840
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorteMemnon wrote:
The History of the Vikings by Gwyn Jones
Page 76 The Norsemen in Kiev in 1018, despite their unquestioned Swedish origin, were described by Thietmar of Merseburg ( Prince-Bishop of Merseburg Germany, 1009–1018 ) as being for the most part Danes. The Irish annalists were a lesson to all with their division of Norse invaders into White Foreigners, Norwegians (Finn- gaill), and Black Foreigners, Danes (Dubh- gaill), but it was a lesson no one heeded; nor do we know why they distinguished them by colour.
Page 77 The Welsh chroniclers, for example, made no such clear distinction. The Danes coming in by way of England and the Norwegians coming in by way of Ireland were pretty well all black: Black Gentiles (y Kenedloed Duon), Black Norsemen (y Normanyeit Duon), Black Host, Pagans, Devils and the like.
Again, stupidass, Norsemen were never freaken black because black people DID NOT EXIST in Scandinavian nations and most other Northern European countries. That is why Northern Europeans DO NOT have black admixture. Dubgaill and Finngaill was in in reference to the different hair, eye, etc colors found in Europeans, and NOT in reference to any racially "black Norsemen " because there never was any racially black Norsemen, idiot.

"Studies of genetic diversity provide some indication of the origin and expansion of the Viking population. The Haplogroup I1 (defined by specific genetic markers on the Y-chromosome) is sometimes referred to as the Viking haplogroup. This mutation occurs with the greatest frequency among Scandinavian males: Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, and peaking Finland. It is also common near the southern Baltic and North Sea coasts, and then successively decreasing further to the south geographically. Genetic studies in the British Isles of the Y-DNA Haplogroup R1a1, seen also across Scandinavia, have demonstrated that the Vikings settled in Britain and Ireland as well as raiding there. Both male and female descent studies show evidence of Norse descent in areas closest to Scandinavia, such as the Shetland and Orkney Islands. Inhabitants of lands farther away show most Norse descent in the male Y-chromosome lines. A specialised genetic and surname study in Liverpool demonstrated marked Norse heritage: up to 50 percent of males who belonged to original families, those who lived there before the years of industrialization and population expansion. High percentages of Norse inheritance—tracked through R1a1 haplotype signatures—were also found among males in the Wirral and West Lancashire. This was similar to the percentage of Norse inheritance found among males in the Orkney Islands."
Jeff

Framingham, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72841
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorteMemnon wrote:
Danes who some say tribe if Dan
Danes are Europeans aka white folk, so if Danes are supposedly the "tribe of Dan" then the 'tribe of Dan' was white cause that is what the Danes have always been. Europe is a None Tropical regions with Low UV Radiation that made light skin more cohesive for survival over black skin. That is why native/aboriginal Europeans are among the lightest humans on earth and especially Northern Europeans who carry TWO SETS of the SLC45A2 because they live in regions of Europe, i.e. British Isles, Scandinavian countries, Danes, etc where Lowest UV Radiation is found, dingleberry, which is why Northern Europeans also happen to be the lightest of all humans. Meaning your black skin would not have been cohesive for survival in those northern regions. Now stop trying to connect your dumbass to freaken Europeans who were never black NOR African and have zero black admixture, and go search for your roots in Sub Sahara West Africa,'GMoney' oops a better pseudo name for you is 'GMooRon'.

" Application of the test to each West Eurasian population (using A = YRI and B = CEU) finds NO evidence of [African] mixture in North Europeans."
http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...
Jeff

Marlborough, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72842
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorteMemnon wrote:
Mark Thomas, from the Centre for Genetic Anthropology, University College London, said other Y-chromosome lineages in Britain from the last 1,000 to 2,000 years probably also have an African origin.
"For example, there's a lineage that's very common in North Wales that's usually found in places like North Africa and Ethiopia," he said.
The new study, Thomas added, "makes the point that we do all have very mixed ancestry."
There are no lineages found in North Wales that are from Sub Sahara Africa because black Africans never had much of a presence in those regions to leave their genetic lineages, that is why Northern Europeans like people from North Wales DO NOT CARRY black admixture. The reason why there isn't much of any ancient black African remains found in the UK or most of Europe is because black Africans did not have much of any presence in Northern Europe, this is why Northern Europeans show to have NO black admixture, stupid. Black Africans hardly ever had an existence in Europe, especially Northern Europe. This is why ancient remains in North Wales, most of the British Isles and in Europe, especially in Northern Europe, show to have ZERO black African lineages, but they do show them to be predominate EUROPEAN in lineages, stupid, such as the Scottish warrior Somerled who was the progenitor of Clan Donald show him to be a member of the European Haplogroup R1a1.
http://www.ourfamilyorigins.com/scotland/r1a....

British Isles Have Changed Little Since Ice Age, Gene Study Says
The genetic makeup of today's British Isles is much the same as it was 12,000 ago, a new science paper shows.
New evidence for the genetic ancestry of modern Britons comes from analysis of blood groups, oxygen traces in teeth, and DNA samples taken from skeletal remains. Ice Age hunter-gathers also colonized the rest of northwest Europe, spreading through what are now the Netherlands, Germany, and France.
The most visible British genetic marker is red hair, he added. "It's something that foreign observers have often commented on," Miles said. "Recent studies have shown that there is more red hair in Scotland and Wales than anywhere else in the world. It's a mutation that probably occurred between 8,000 and 10,000 years ago."
Population estimates based on the size and density of settlements put Britain's population at about 3.5 million by the time Romans invaded in A.D. 43."
Jeff

Marlborough, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72843
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NorteMemnon wrote:
<quoted text> idk who you talking to but all my source mention origin of these blacks most say North Africa and Mauritania. Thank for not researching. Im aware of mediterranean types,dravidian,negritos but who im talking bout are Negros. Dont worry I got this
Liar, no you don't, you talk about freaken Middle Eastern people like the Hebrew who are similar to MODERN Middle Eastern people, and then you keep talking about Europeans like the Vikings, British, and many others who not only are among the fairest of all human beings but have NO black admixture in them since you blacks never had any presence in their European homelands and who cluster the furthest away from you Sub Saharan African types. You are self hating Afroclown with an identity crisis and need serious mental help. Now go search for your roots in Sub Sahara West Africa and NOT in people and civilizatinos that were never black NOR Afircan,'GMoney' or 'The Enemy Within' or a better pseudo name for you is 'GMooRonKook".

"However, the first point to make from this enhanced data set is the obvious similarity of the haplogroup frequency profiles of West Africa, west central Africa, and southwestern Africa in comparison with the other major regions of the continent. The African American DNA sample from the United States is striking for its strong resemblance to the DNA composition of all three of these regions (fig. 1b). African American DNA is almost indistinguishable from that of these three African regions (fig. 1c).

An analysis that combined these two similar regions yielded values of 52.5% for West Africa and 47.5% for west-central Africa. For a high-resolution analysis, to decrease the SD of the estimates, we divided the lineages into 56 haplogroups on phylogenetic grounds, such that no haplogroup included !20 samples. In this case, West Africa contributed 60%, southwestern Africa 30%, and west-central Africa 9%(table 2). In this case, the correlation between west-central and southwestern African values was reduced to 0.6. These values can be compared with classic estimates provided 130 years ago by Curtin (1969, p. 157) and with more up-to-date estimates. Curtin (1969) estimated that 50.4% of North American slaves came from West Africa and 47.8% from west-central Africa, with just 1.6% from southeastern Africa. A much more recent estimate for the United States (McMillin 2004, pp. 48, 54, and 70) suggests that &#8764;64% were from West Africa, &#8764;35% from west-central Africa, and &#8764;1% from southeastern Africa. Interestingly, our values are closer to the more recent estimate." ~ Charting the Ancestry of African Americans A. Salas, A´ ngel Carracedo,1 M. Richards,2 and V. Macaulay3
lmao

Bowie, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72844
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Um...white people also descended from the very sexy hairy neanderthal so nope white people were never black! The neanderthal was a white hairy boy who slept with African woman in Asia producing Cro-Magnon. Cro-Magnon were the first people in the Middle East,Europe and North Africa 43000 years ago and they continued to interbreed with the very hairy but always very sexy neanderthal until they wiped the poor hairy beast out!
Recreation of a very hairy sexy neanderthal 70 000 years old:
www.zgeek.com/chuck-norris-neanderthal/
Cro-Magnon man:
www.sciencephoto.com/media/481366/view
World DNA map showing whites are MOST DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO BLACK AFRICANS:
www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogrou...
Still waiting for one of you blancos to explain the MYTH/MIRACLE of how if you were already white when you entered Europe 43,000 years ago, how did you manage to turn white AGAIN 6,000 years ago? Where do they do that at?

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72845
Aug 21, 2013
 
In 1954.Cheikh Anta Diop, Diop argued that ancient Egypt had been populated by Black people. He specified that he used the terms "negro", "black", "white" and "race" as "immediate givens" in the Bergsonian sense, and went on to suggest operational definitions of these terms. He said that the Egyptian language and culture had later been spread to West Africa. THE hebrew would learn everything eygptian an they moved west from eygpt,one would think it was some eygptians, but really it was they hebrews getting away from eygpt
lmao

Bowie, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72846
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Danes are Europeans aka white folk, so if Danes are supposedly the "tribe of Dan" then the 'tribe of Dan' was white cause that is what the Danes have always been. Europe is a None Tropical regions with Low UV Radiation that made light skin more cohesive for survival over black skin. That is why native/aboriginal Europeans are among the lightest humans on earth and especially Northern Europeans who carry TWO SETS of the SLC45A2 because they live in regions of Europe, i.e. British Isles, Scandinavian countries, Danes, etc where Lowest UV Radiation is found, dingleberry, which is why Northern Europeans also happen to be the lightest of all humans. Meaning your black skin would not have been cohesive for survival in those northern regions. Now stop trying to connect your dumbass to freaken Europeans who were never black NOR African and have zero black admixture, and go search for your roots in Sub Sahara West Africa,'GMoney' oops a better pseudo name for you is 'GMooRon'.
" Application of the test to each West Eurasian population (using A = YRI and B = CEU) finds NO evidence of [African] mixture in North Europeans."
http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...
The evolution of the pale face occurred LONG after the arrival of modern humans in Europe. When you touched down in Scandanavia fool you looked like little Michael Jackson fool. But as time moved on, you lightened up.
Pale faces carry one variant (allele) of SLC45A2, while Africans and Asians carry the other. The one that pale faces carry is the one responsible for totally stripping you flat @$$ Neanderthals of skin color 6,000 years ago. Keep this in mind when you want to claim that you were always white pookie!
7New Earth7

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72847
Aug 21, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ben its obvious you don't know how to tackle the angel of the Lord that was with Daniel..... I'm still waiting for you to say something!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 67,401 - 67,420 of94,260
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
Ashburn Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••