Hebrew Israelite
Chlo

Suwanee, GA

#72890 Aug 21, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Ruddy means a healthy reddish tint in the face. Usually a white man spending a lot of time out of doors would get a ruddy complexion. David is also described as being fair. No black person is described as being fair! Solomon is described as white and ruddy. So the ancient Israelites looked exactly like their descendants the Samaritans! Some of them look really ruddy.
What color of red are the using as a comparison? The only shade of red that would be able to describe someone's color is of the red soil. Red soil looks more like a reddish brown.

BLACK PEOPLE COME IN ALL SHADES! There are LIGHT SKINNED black people!

Also the scripture doesn't say that David was fair skin, the scripture says that he becomes ruddy, so he blushed! Black people are able to blush as well!
NorteMemnon

United States

#72891 Aug 21, 2013
Chlo wrote:
<quoted text>
What color of red are the using as a comparison? The only shade of red that would be able to describe someone's color is of the red soil. Red soil looks more like a reddish brown.
BLACK PEOPLE COME IN ALL SHADES! There are LIGHT SKINNED black people!
Also the scripture doesn't say that David was fair skin, the scripture says that he becomes ruddy, so he blushed! Black people are able to blush as well!
Ok Adam was Ruddy so he still wasnt caucasion or eurasian. Neanderthal doesnt count as mankind but beast of the field. Genetically Khoisans the oldest and they are Ruddy even get a reddish tan.
Chlo

Suwanee, GA

#72892 Aug 21, 2013
For the people that are saying the Jews are the descendants, what proof do you have? You aren't using the bible, which is strange. If the Jews were the descendants then you should be able to use the bible as a source.

If the Jews are the descendants then why didn't the Curse of Disobedience happen while they were in Europe?
The bible says that the Israelites would be taken to a foreign land. Europe was NOT foreign, the Romans are from Europe... So thats one thing about the Jews that doesn't add up...
Another thing the bible says the Israelites looked like Ethiopians (Amos 9:7), who just happen to be a BLACK race... A second thing that doesn't go along with the Jews.
Lets not forget about how the Jews are from the Khazrian Empire when they converted...
Ashkenazi comes from the word Ashkenaz, who was the son of Gomer and the grandson of Japheth. Now Japheth was the father of the GENTILES.

The bible says that Israel would be filled with Gentiles until the time when God come and delivers his children back to the land. The world hasn't ended so that means God has not come yet. Which means the time of the Gentiles in Israel is still going on. The bible also says that when God does bring his children back they would be living safe and that the land would safe as well. Whats going on in Israel right now is the total opposite of what the bible says! So you can't say the United Nation bringing the Jews to Israel fulfilled the prophecy because the U.N. is NOT God, and the Jews are not safe, since they get millions of threats a day.
NorteMemnon

United States

#72893 Aug 21, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Nowhere does it describe them as Sub Saharan Africans from Central Africa, you self hating idiot. The term back then used for racially black people was 'N****' and this term was NOT applied towards any of those white groups your dumbass is trying to claim, stupidass.
Everybody can see you full of shit. What other race coming out of Central Africa. Just admit you learned something new today. When people say "DIFFERENT RACE" that means opposite GENES,PHYSIQUES,CULTURE not DIFERENT SHADE OF HAIR. Slowbird
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72894 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
<quoted text>Everybody can see you full of shit. What other race coming out of Central Africa. Just admit you learned something new today. When people say "DIFFERENT RACE" that means opposite GENES,PHYSIQUES,CULTURE not DIFERENT SHADE OF HAIR. Slowbird
You are the one who is full of sh!t as usualy, socketpuppet. And there was nothing about any 'race' coming out of Central Africa, dumbass. Just admit that you are as clueless as ever and know nothing absolutely nothing about human evolution, reject.
Whodonit

Chicago, IL

#72895 Aug 21, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Must be my new deoderant!
No you never never used deodorant. but I tell you you should used so 100000 for your pink skin, the African sun is your enemy.
Guest

United States

#72896 Aug 21, 2013
Smh

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#72898 Aug 21, 2013
PHAED71 wrote:
<quoted text>
B stay on his azz..put foot to azz
they never want to deal with bible history, they cant explain that away, ok where they go? 588bc the whole nation went into africa,an was promise to be ship to strange land with yoke naked hungry in want of everything,till we was destroyed, ok they see it! they knows we be them hebrews

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#72899 Aug 21, 2013
To show you we ran all into africa are the few they took away, it couldnt have been a 10 pure hebrews in the land, im gone show you wasnt none just like good book said!Jeremiah 44:6;Wherefore my fury and mine anger was poured forth, and was kindled in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; and they are wasted and desolate, as at this day;Now look what Jeremiah said after Following the people into AFRICA,Jeremiah 44:20;Then Jeremiah said unto all the people, to the men, and to the women, and to all the people which had given him that answer, saying,Jeremiah 44:21;he incense that ye burned in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, ye, and your fathers, your kings, and your princes, and the people of the land, did not the LORD remember them, and came it not into his mind?;Jeremiah 44:22;So that the LORD could no longer bear, because of the evil of your doings, and because of the abominations which ye have committed; therefore is your land a desolation, and an astonishment, and a curse, without an inhabitant, as at this day,you see they was in AFRICA NOBODY left, everybody got on down whom the Babylonians had left, they took off the first chance they got,thats why JEREMIAH was saying "come back! come back" read Jeremiah 44:24;Moreover Jeremiah said unto all the people, and to all the women, Hear the word of the LORD, all Judah that are in the land of Egypt:you see that "ALL JUDAH in the land of eygpt"to show you it wasnt none in the land,Jeremiah 52:12;Now in the fifth month, in the tenth day of the month, which was the nineteenth year of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, came Nebuzaradan, captain of the guard, which served the king of Babylon, into Jerusalem,you see yo boy "Nebuzaradan" burned to whole TOWN DOWN,Jeremiah 52:13;And burned the house of the LORD, and the king's house; and all the houses of Jerusalem, and all the houses of the great men, burned he with fire: "Nebuzaradan"was acting a fool!Jeremiah 52:14;And all the army of the Chaldeans, that were with the captain of the guard, brake down all the walls of Jerusalem round about.now check this!Jeremiah 52:15;Then Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard carried away captive certain of the poor of the people, and the residue of the people that remained in the city, and those that fell away, that fell to the king of Babylon, and the rest of the multitude.THESE the ONE's that took ove to made it NONE in the Land Jeremiah 52:16 But Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard left certain of the poor of the land for vinedressers and for husbandmen.ok lets go back a lil an see what happen to the people that "Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard left" go to Jeremiah 43:3;But Baruch the son of Neriah setteth thee on against us, for to deliver us into the hand of the Chaldeans, that they might put us to death, and carry us away captives into Babylon,Jeremiah 43:4 So Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces, and all the people, obeyed not the voice of the LORD, to dwell in the land of Judah.you see it says 'all the people'Jeremiah 43:5;But Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces, took all the remnant of Judah, that were returned from all nations, whither they had been driven, to dwell in the land of Judah;they came back from the assyrian attacks they had 135 years to made it home an they did,they went into africa with the ones Nebuzaradan had left behind Jeremiah 43:6;Even men, and women, and children, and the king's daughters, and every person that Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard had left with Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan, and Jeremiah the prophet, and Baruch the son of Neriah,Jeremiah 43:7So they came into the land of Egypt: for they obeyed not the voice of the LORD: thus came they even to Tahpanhes.
Cymraes

Swansea, UK

#72900 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
The History of the Vikings by Gwyn Jones
Page 76 The Norsemen in Kiev in 1018, despite their unquestioned Swedish origin, were described by Thietmar of Merseburg ( Prince-Bishop of Merseburg Germany, 1009–1018 ) as being for the most part Danes. The Irish annalists were a lesson to all with their division of Norse invaders into White Foreigners, Norwegians (Finn- gaill), and Black Foreigners, Danes (Dubh- gaill), but it was a lesson no one heeded; nor do we know why they distinguished them by colour.
Page 77 The Welsh chroniclers, for example, made no such clear distinction. The Danes coming in by way of England and the Norwegians coming in by way of Ireland were pretty well all black: Black Gentiles (y Kenedloed Duon), Black Norsemen (y Normanyeit Duon), Black Host, Pagans, Devils and the like.
I see you are quoting from the book TRUE MYTH: BLACK VIKINGS OF THEMIDDLE AGES
By Nashid Al-Amin

http://books.google.co.uk/books...

Gwyn Jones stated the following.

The Irish knew the Vikings as Gaill ("Gentiles" or foreigners), Lochlann ("lakemen"), Normanni ("north-men") and Danes, regardless of where they may have originated in Scandinavia. At the beginning of Viking attacks upon Ireland, the new invaders were known simply as Gaill, however in time the Irish annalists began to distinguish between two types of Vikings: the Finn-Gaill ("white foreigners") and Dubh-Gaill ("black foreigners"). While it is obvious that by the use of these two names the Irish meant to distinguish between two separate types of Viking raiders, it is not clear what the actual distinction between the groups was. It cannot be a physical or racial type, since the Scandinavian peoples of this period had no such divisions between them, being descended from the same Germanic migrations (Keary, The Vikings in Western Christendom, p. 193). Some scholars have proposed that the term Finn-Gaill was meant to refer to Norwegian Vikings, while Dubh-Gaill referred to Vikings of Danish origin. However this seems unlikely, for the neighboring Welsh chroniclers made no such distinction -- most of the Welsh terms for "Viking" incorporated the term "black" by way of describing them as "black hearted" or evil: Y Kenedloed Duon (Black Gentiles), Y Normanyeit Duon (Black Norsemen), Black Host, Pagans, Devils, and so on -- the Welsh History of Gruffydd ap Cynan specifically mentions both Danes and Norwegians without distinguishing them as "black" and "white" (Gwyn Jones, A History of the Vikings, pp 76-77).

He also states on pages 17-18

The three Scandinavian Countries known for more than a thousand years as Sweden, Denmark and Norway have had a long if not continuously recorded history, and every stage of it helped mould the lands, peoples and Kingdoms as we behold them in the Viking Age.

There is evidence from physical anthropology that the people of the far north dwelling, in the village settlements of the Varangerfjord were of the same 'Nordic' racial type as the inhabitants of the Oslofjord in the south.
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72901 Aug 21, 2013
Cymraes wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you are quoting from the book TRUE MYTH: BLACK VIKINGS OF THEMIDDLE AGES
By Nashid Al-Amin
http://books.google.co.uk/books...
Gwyn Jones stated the following.
The Irish knew the Vikings as Gaill ("Gentiles" or foreigners), Lochlann ("lakemen"), Normanni ("north-men") and Danes, regardless of where they may have originated in Scandinavia. At the beginning of Viking attacks upon Ireland, the new invaders were known simply as Gaill, however in time the Irish annalists began to distinguish between two types of Vikings: the Finn-Gaill ("white foreigners") and Dubh-Gaill ("black foreigners"). While it is obvious that by the use of these two names the Irish meant to distinguish between two separate types of Viking raiders, it is not clear what the actual distinction between the groups was. It cannot be a physical or racial type, since the Scandinavian peoples of this period had no such divisions between them, being descended from the same Germanic migrations (Keary, The Vikings in Western Christendom, p. 193). Some scholars have proposed that the term Finn-Gaill was meant to refer to Norwegian Vikings, while Dubh-Gaill referred to Vikings of Danish origin. However this seems unlikely, for the neighboring Welsh chroniclers made no such distinction -- most of the Welsh terms for "Viking" incorporated the term "black" by way of describing them as "black hearted" or evil: Y Kenedloed Duon (Black Gentiles), Y Normanyeit Duon (Black Norsemen), Black Host, Pagans, Devils, and so on -- the Welsh History of Gruffydd ap Cynan specifically mentions both Danes and Norwegians without distinguishing them as "black" and "white" (Gwyn Jones, A History of the Vikings, pp 76-77).
He also states on pages 17-18
The three Scandinavian Countries known for more than a thousand years as Sweden, Denmark and Norway have had a long if not continuously recorded history, and every stage of it helped mould the lands, peoples and Kingdoms as we behold them in the Viking Age.
There is evidence from physical anthropology that the people of the far north dwelling, in the village settlements of the Varangerfjord were of the same 'Nordic' racial type as the inhabitants of the Oslofjord in the south.
Exactly. Nashid Al-Amin is another Afrocentric clown who take things out of context to promote his own lies. These fools fail to understand that Vikings and Northern Europeans were never black because black people did not exist in Northern European countries. That is why Northern Europeans DO NOT have black admixture. Plenty of genetic and archeological evidence exists for these people as well as those of ancient Europeans, they show them to be similar to modern Europeans, in other words they were white. ;-)

"Studies of genetic diversity provide some indication of the origin and expansion of the Viking population. The Haplogroup I1 (defined by specific genetic markers on the Y-chromosome) is sometimes referred to as the Viking haplogroup. This mutation occurs with the greatest frequency among Scandinavian males: Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, and peaking Finland. It is also common near the southern Baltic and North Sea coasts, and then successively decreasing further to the south geographically. Genetic studies in the British Isles of the Y-DNA Haplogroup R1a1, seen also across Scandinavia, have demonstrated that the Vikings settled in Britain and Ireland as well as raiding there. High percentages of Norse inheritance—tracked through R1a1 haplotype signatures—were also found among males in the Wirral and West Lancashire. This was similar to the percentage of Norse inheritance found among males in the Orkney Islands."
Cymraes

Swansea, UK

#72902 Aug 21, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Nashid Al-Amin is another Afrocentric clown who take things out of context to promote his own lies. These fools fail to understand that Vikings and Northern Europeans were never black because black people did not exist in Northern European countries. That is why Northern Europeans DO NOT have black admixture. Plenty of genetic and archeological evidence exists for these people as well as those of ancient Europeans, they show them to be similar to modern Europeans, in other words they were white. ;-)
"Studies of genetic diversity provide some indication of the origin and expansion of the Viking population. The Haplogroup I1 (defined by specific genetic markers on the Y-chromosome) is sometimes referred to as the Viking haplogroup. This mutation occurs with the greatest frequency among Scandinavian males: Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, and peaking Finland. It is also common near the southern Baltic and North Sea coasts, and then successively decreasing further to the south geographically. Genetic studies in the British Isles of the Y-DNA Haplogroup R1a1, seen also across Scandinavia, have demonstrated that the Vikings settled in Britain and Ireland as well as raiding there. High percentages of Norse inheritance—tracked through R1a1 haplotype signatures—were also found among males in the Wirral and West Lancashire. This was similar to the percentage of Norse inheritance found among males in the Orkney Islands."
This article mentions the Orkneys, as well as the Welsh and Cornish.
Cymraes

Swansea, UK

#72903 Aug 21, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Nashid Al-Amin is another Afrocentric clown who take things out of context to promote his own lies. These fools fail to understand that Vikings and Northern Europeans were never black because black people did not exist in Northern European countries. That is why Northern Europeans DO NOT have black admixture. Plenty of genetic and archeological evidence exists for these people as well as those of ancient Europeans, they show them to be similar to modern Europeans, in other words they were white. ;-)
"Studies of genetic diversity provide some indication of the origin and expansion of the Viking population. The Haplogroup I1 (defined by specific genetic markers on the Y-chromosome) is sometimes referred to as the Viking haplogroup. This mutation occurs with the greatest frequency among Scandinavian males: Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, and peaking Finland. It is also common near the southern Baltic and North Sea coasts, and then successively decreasing further to the south geographically. Genetic studies in the British Isles of the Y-DNA Haplogroup R1a1, seen also across Scandinavia, have demonstrated that the Vikings settled in Britain and Ireland as well as raiding there. High percentages of Norse inheritance—tracked through R1a1 haplotype signatures—were also found among males in the Wirral and West Lancashire. This was similar to the percentage of Norse inheritance found among males in the Orkney Islands."
Sorry forgot to add link

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-ne...

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#72904 Aug 21, 2013
we needs the whole west coast of africa,its part of our inheritance,
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72905 Aug 21, 2013
lmao wrote:
<quoted text>
What a brain dead primate/Neanderthal you are. ASIP and KITLG, in addition to "European, Near Eastern and East Asian populations" can also be found in African Americans and in West Africans. ASIP, specifically allele 8188G is significantly associated with skin color variation in African-Americans not Neanderthal/Europigs so get that out ya mouth fool!
SLC24A5, 6,000 years ago pale face, not 43,000 years ago!
Recreation of 35 000 year old Cro-Magnon man:
www.sciencephoto.com/media/481366/view
70 000 year old neanderthal recreated:
www.zgeek.com/chuck-norris-neanderthal/
And white people still look like their ancestor the neanderthal!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72906 Aug 21, 2013
lmao wrote:
Now this is the genealogy of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And sons were born to them after the flood. The sons of Japheth were Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. The sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah.
Ashkenaz are from Japheth not Shem. Kill that noise!
But REAL JEWS come from Shem including the Ashkenazi Jews! They moved to Khazarian Empire but didnt originate there! Just like REAL Jews moved to Greece,Rome in ancient times! Does that make them Japheth! Look at DNA!!!!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72907 Aug 21, 2013
lmao wrote:
<quoted text>
Cry me a river! And you are not a Hebrew, descendent of a wolf, gorilla, none of that. You are a mutated descendent of the Black Man and the Black Woman. In other words, you are our lil beeyoch!
Nope whites originated from the very sexy hairy neanderthal who were the first everywhere in the world!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72908 Aug 21, 2013
Chlo wrote:
<quoted text>
What color of red are the using as a comparison? The only shade of red that would be able to describe someone's color is of the red soil. Red soil looks more like a reddish brown.
BLACK PEOPLE COME IN ALL SHADES! There are LIGHT SKINNED black people!
Also the scripture doesn't say that David was fair skin, the scripture says that he becomes ruddy, so he blushed! Black people are able to blush as well!
Um... I live in Africa and have never seen a black person blush. If they do blush it most definitely not visible! So nope ruddy most definitely describes a white person!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72909 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
<quoted text> Ok Adam was Ruddy so he still wasnt caucasion or eurasian. Neanderthal doesnt count as mankind but beast of the field. Genetically Khoisans the oldest and they are Ruddy even get a reddish tan.
Khoisans are brown people! Adam means RED in Hebrew! Solomon is described as white and ruddy in the bible and David is described as fair and ruddy! Neanderthals are the oldest people in the world! They definitely are PEOPLE because they are related to Europeans and Asians! Modern Europeans look just like their neanderthal ancestor:
www.zgeek.com/chuck-norris-neanderthal/
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72910 Aug 21, 2013
Chlo wrote:
For the people that are saying the Jews are the descendants, what proof do you have? You aren't using the bible, which is strange. If the Jews were the descendants then you should be able to use the bible as a source.
If the Jews are the descendants then why didn't the Curse of Disobedience happen while they were in Europe?
The bible says that the Israelites would be taken to a foreign land. Europe was NOT foreign, the Romans are from Europe... So thats one thing about the Jews that doesn't add up...
Another thing the bible says the Israelites looked like Ethiopians (Amos 9:7), who just happen to be a BLACK race... A second thing that doesn't go along with the Jews.
Lets not forget about how the Jews are from the Khazrian Empire when they converted...
Ashkenazi comes from the word Ashkenaz, who was the son of Gomer and the grandson of Japheth. Now Japheth was the father of the GENTILES.
The bible says that Israel would be filled with Gentiles until the time when God come and delivers his children back to the land. The world hasn't ended so that means God has not come yet. Which means the time of the Gentiles in Israel is still going on. The bible also says that when God does bring his children back they would be living safe and that the land would safe as well. Whats going on in Israel right now is the total opposite of what the bible says! So you can't say the United Nation bringing the Jews to Israel fulfilled the prophecy because the U.N. is NOT God, and the Jews are not safe, since they get millions of threats a day.
The Samaritans ARE THE REAL DESCENDANTS OF THE ANCIENT ISRAELITES! Ethiopians are black Africans more related to other black Africans! Samaritans only have 2% Sub-Saharan DNA! Middle Eastern people have less than 4% African DNA and are more related to neanderthals!It states extremely clearly in the bible that Ethiopians are NOT
Israelites:
2 Chronicles 14:12-13
Zephaniah: 2-12
West Africans/AA are NOT related to any Middle Eastern people! You are living in a fairy tale world giving yourself a history that isnt yours!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min OBAMANATION 1,480,262
ALL Arabs berbers WILL get the fk out our sacre... 1 min mvm 64
Why are beautiful women usually single? (Feb '11) 3 min lonu 203
Are black people really the real jews? (Oct '12) 8 min Barr 1,803
Why every race of women love black guys? 13 min chinaman 22
Eurocentric Myth Busters: Blacks Are Naturally ... 15 min Snap 48
Yes! Victorian Dresses "DID" COPY natural curva... 16 min Alabaster Goddess 24
News King's legacy celebrated as Trump, Lewis duel l... 2 hr American Independent 219
No more BM/BW couple? Is black love dead? 3 hr Lolblackpeople 66
My Indian cousin married a black man & had a ba... 4 hr Samoan Irish 98
More from around the web