Again Brunette European types, NOT racially black people like yourself. In other words Fair Europeans aka BLONDS also known as ---> NORDIC Teutonic <--- vs. Dark Europeans aka BRUNETTES also known as ---> Alpine, Mediterranean, Dinaric <--, NONE of these groups were ever racially black nor described as racially black cause they were NOT black. People back then called racially black people "N*******" and this term was NOT applied towards ANY Europeans and especially NORTHERN Europeans were black people did not have much of an existence, "The Enemy Within" or "NorteMemnon" or "GMoney" or whatever other FAKE name you post under next.Charles Squire "Celtic Myth and Legends"
The earliest of these two races would seem to have inhabited our islands from the most ancient times, and may, for our purpose, be described as aboriginal. It was the people that built the "long barrows"; and which is variously called by ethnologists the Iberian, Mediterranean, Berber, Basque, Silurian, or Euskarian race. In physique it was short, swarthy, dark- haired, dark-eyed, and long-skulled; its language belonged to the class called "Hamitic", the surviving types of which are found among the Gallas, Abyssinians, Berbers, and other North African tribes; and it seems to have come originally from some part either of Eastern, Northern, or Central Africa.
"The generally small differences found between observed and expected values for skin coloration appear to reflect differences between populations in duration of habitation in their respective areas. Populations believed to have inhabited their current area of distribution for 20,000 years (e.g., Iberian, Basques) conform most closely to predicted values for skin reflectance. Those which are thought to have migrated into their current locations more recently (e.g., Aboriginal Australians from Darwin who are migrants from the Central Desert) conform less closely to predicted values." ~ Jablonski et al.