Hebrew Israelite
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#72823 Aug 21, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
That is just in the mind of uneducated slaves spent their life for free service in the kitchen, with out reading. Logical men always assume demo-graphical changes and peoples dynamism. How do you understand this statement.
"The presence of dark skin in general is not a reliable genetic marker, including among groups in Africa. For example, Wilson et al.(2001) found that most of their Ethiopian samples showed closer genetic affinity with light-skinned Armenians and Norwegians than with dark-skinned Bantu populations.[99] Mohamoud (2006) likewise observed that their Somali samples were genetically more similar to Arab populations than to other African populations.[100]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_skin
<quoted text> Dumbass self denying racist. The term 'Africa' and 'African' refers geographical area and never people's identity. North Africans all are meditranian in skull type and have exactly the same skull as the middle eastern.
Caucasians have brachiocephalic type of skull, not typical of ancient Semites. Ancient Semites had a dolicocephalic type of skull, typical of Northern Africa and the middle east and absent in Europeans. Your Cape Malay are never diffrent from west Africans. It is just your tongue that is European.
2001 OUT OF DATE! DNA SHOWS ETHIOPIANS ARE MUCH MORE RELATED TO AFRICANS! STOP TRYING TO BE WHITE!

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#72824 Aug 21, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>2001 OUT OF DATE! DNA SHOWS ETHIOPIANS ARE MUCH MORE RELATED TO AFRICANS! STOP TRYING TO BE WHITE!
Jealous ignorant self denying slave! I never wanted to look anything of the whites, you really do not know who Ethiopians are! We love our looks very very much and that is why every one is dreaming to look like Ethiopians (including you, the Cape Malay)

“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#72825 Aug 21, 2013
some people can't seem to grasp the fact that only one tenth of 1 percent of the human genetic code is used for determining there haplogroup. 94 to 96 percent of variability happens with in a grolup!!!
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#72826 Aug 21, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Jealous ignorant self denying slave! I never wanted to look anything of the whites, you really do not know who Ethiopians are! We love our looks very very much and that is why every one is dreaming to look like Ethiopians (including you, the Cape Malay)
LOL I see the ugly things walking in Cape Town all the time!
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#72827 Aug 21, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
That is just in the mind of uneducated slaves spent their life for free service in the kitchen, with out reading. Logical men always assume demo-graphical changes and peoples dynamism. How do you understand this statement.
"The presence of dark skin in general is not a reliable genetic marker, including among groups in Africa. For example, Wilson et al.(2001) found that most of their Ethiopian samples showed closer genetic affinity with light-skinned Armenians and Norwegians than with dark-skinned Bantu populations.[99] Mohamoud (2006) likewise observed that their Somali samples were genetically more similar to Arab populations than to other African populations.[100]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_skin
<quoted text> Dumbass self denying racist. The term 'Africa' and 'African' refers geographical area and never people's identity. North Africans all are meditranian in skull type and have exactly the same skull as the middle eastern.
Caucasians have brachiocephalic type of skull, not typical of ancient Semites. Ancient Semites had a dolicocephalic type of skull, typical of Northern Africa and the middle east and absent in Europeans. Your Cape Malay are never diffrent from west Africans. It is just your tongue that is European.
Ancient Semites/Europeans ARE RELATED! The Eurasian Middle Eastern Neolithic Farmers went into Europe bringing the skull shape and DNA to Europeans! Female Europeans and Middle Eastern women ARE EXTREMELY related by DNA and more than likely have the same shape skulls! 6000 year old people from nearby Jericho have EXACTLY the same DNA as modern Middle Eastern people! North Africans like Arabs are extremely mixed with Africans! Unless they are Jews they dont count!
Yeahman

United States

#72828 Aug 21, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Ancient Semites/Europeans ARE RELATED! The Eurasian Middle Eastern Neolithic Farmers went into Europe bringing the skull shape and DNA to Europeans! Female Europeans and Middle Eastern women ARE EXTREMELY related by DNA and more than likely have the same shape skulls! 6000 year old people from nearby Jericho have EXACTLY the same DNA as modern Middle Eastern people! North Africans like Arabs are extremely mixed with Africans! Unless they are Jews they dont count!
What a joke.The descendats of Ja&#8242;pheth(Indo-Europe ans -germanic) want to be descendants of Shem (Semites)
trollslayer

Cedar Lake, IN

#72829 Aug 21, 2013
JOHNS ON TOP OF IT wrote:
European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =M5f0JxwR-0kXX
2 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
3 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
4 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
5a European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
6 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
7 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
8 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
9 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
10 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
11 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
12 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
13 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
14 European Distortion of African History
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
of course trolls never want to address the lies about African history
trollslayer

Cedar Lake, IN

#72830 Aug 21, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Jealous ignorant self denying slave! I never wanted to look anything of the whites, you really do not know who Ethiopians are! We love our looks very very much and that is why every one is dreaming to look like Ethiopians (including you, the Cape Malay)
You so realize true Ethiopians have nothing to do with euros and that euros come from Ethiopians

“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#72831 Aug 21, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Jealous ignorant self denying slave! I never wanted to look anything of the whites, you really do not know who Ethiopians are! We love our looks very very much and that is why every one is dreaming to look like Ethiopians (including you, the Cape Malay)

That is an exceedingly self serving statement!!!

Maybe the pahan has a desire to favor you, but i dont see anyone else expressing such nonsense. I most certainly wouldn't want to look like you!!! The fact that i do look slimilar is do to my heritage. But otherw, youre full of it . Thinking people want to look l i ke you. LLOL!!!
yeahman

United States

#72832 Aug 21, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
You so realize true Ethiopians have nothing to do with euros and that euros come from Ethiopians
So euros now want to be negros> how confusing for them.pitifull

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#72833 Aug 21, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
You so realize true Ethiopians have nothing to do with euros and that euros come from Ethiopians
You're not a Hebrew.
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#72834 Aug 21, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
of course trolls never want to address the lies about African history
Load of Afronazi junk!
Yeahman

United States

#72835 Aug 21, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Load of Afronazi junk!
How pathetic use of the word. In fact you reek of a foul smell.
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72836 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
(quotes from "Our Darker Forefathers").
In the Irish annals the Black Vikings are called Dubh-Ghenti, or Black Gentiles. These Black Gentiles on some occasions fought against other plunderers of the Irish coasts known as the Fair Gentiles, who can hardly have been others than the fair Danes or Northmen. In the year 851 the Black Gentiles came to Athcliath i.e., Dublin. In 852 we are told that eight ships of the Finn-Ghenti arrived and fought against the Dubh-Ghenti for three days, and that the Dubh-Ghenti were victorious.
You are an Afrocentric lying dumbass who takes things out of context to promote whatever lies you want. Why don't you quote the beginning of Shore's work where he SPECIFICALLY states the descriptions found in his works are in reference to the different EYE, HAIR, etc colors found in Europeans and NOT in reference to any racially "black Africans", you self hating reject? Here you go, lying clown:

"One of the facts concerning the colour of the ---> HAIR and EYES <--- of the people in different counties of England at the present time." ~ Shore; "Our Darker Forefathers"

In other words, Shore is NOT claiming HIS and other Europeans "Darker Forefathers" were racially black Africans but Europeans of all types from blondes, to gingers to BRUNETTE aka WHITE folk, idiot. The passage from above is describing European aka white people, NOT racially black people like yourself. In other words Fair Europeans aka BLONDS also known as ---> NORDIC Teutonic <--- vs. Dark Europeans aka BRUNETTES also known as ---> Alpine, Mediterranean, Dinaric <--, NONE of these groups were ever racially black nor described as racially black cause they were NOT black. People back then called racially black people "N*******" and this term was NOT applied towards ANY Europeans and especially NORTHERN Europeans were black people did not have much of an existence, you stupid ass. From Shore's works:

"The typical old ---> TEUTONIC <--- skull is dolichocephalic, the skull of the British people of the Bronze Age in brachycephalic. The inference that there was a fusion of race between the Saxons and Angles and people descending from men of the Bronze Age is easily drawn. From what has been said of the presence of broadheaded people of a ---> BRUNETTE <---- type in parts of Norway, among the much more numerous long-headed people of a fair complexion who formed the bulk of the Norwegian nation. The same result is obtained by the study of the broad-headed people of Central Europe at the present day, the descendants presumably of the old ---> ALPINE <--- race."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpine_race

Sorry none of these Europeans were ever 'racially black' nor described as 'racially black'. They were as white as their modern descendants are today and ranged from blonds, to gingers to brunette Europeans do today, in other words all white folk,'GMooRon'.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72837 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
Dodge Ball Game begin!
Saga of Thorfinn Karlsefne - 1007 A.D.
p. 218- 219
There was a man hight Thorvard; he married Freydis, a natural daughter of Erik the Red; he went also with them, and Thorvald the son of Erik, 1 and Thorhall who was called the hunter; he had long been with Erik, and served him as huntsman in summer and steward in winter; he was a large man, and strong, black and like a giant, silent and foul-mouthed in his speech.
Egil's Saga
Chapter 1
Kveldulf and his wife had two sons, the elder was named Thorolf, the younger Grim; these, when they grew up, were both tall men and strong, as was their father. But Thorolf was most comely as well as doughty, favoring his mother's kin; very cheery was he, liberal, impetuous in everything, a good trader, winning the hearts of all men. Grim was swarthy, ill- favoured, like his father both in face and mind.
You yet again show your ignorance. Vikings were never racially black, stupidass. These Europeans were among the fairest of all Euros. The descriptions were in reference to the different hair, eye, etc colors found in Europeans and NOT in reference to any racially "black Vikings" which never existed since black people never had much of any presence in the Vikings homelands. Erik the Red meant he was a GINGER, while Thorhall the Black meant he was a BRUNETTE, not 'racially' black. That is how Northern Europeans described one another, a Brunette European like Collin Farrell would have been know as "black" NOT because he was racially black but because of his BRUNETTE coloring, vs. a Red headed European like Erik the Red who was called RED NOT because he had red skin color but because he was a GINGER. Black people did not exist in Scandinavian countries, that is why these people have ZERO black admixture. Again people back then called racially black people "N*******" and this term was NOT applied towards ANY Europeans let alone NORTHERN Europeans who have no black admixture since black people did not have much of any presence in those regions.
http://www.google.com/imgres...
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72838 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
Egil's Saga
Chapter 55
Egil was large-featured, broad of forehead, with large eyebrows, a nose not long but very thick, lips wide and long, chin exceeding broad, as was all about the jaws; thick-necked was he, and big-shouldered beyond other men, hard-featured, and grim when angry. He was well-made, more than commonly tall, had hair wolf-gray and thick, but became early bald. He was black-eyed and brown-skinned.
Once yet,MooRon, Vikings were never racially black. The descriptions were in reference to the different hair, eye, etc colors found in Europeans, and NOT in reference to any racially "black Vikings". Black people did not exist in Scandinavian countries, that is why these people have ZERO black admixture, you self hating idiot. The description given above is for a Brunette European like Collin Farrell, NOT a freaken racially black person who 1) didn't exist in those European regions and 2) would have been called a "N*****" since that is the term used for racially black people back then, and that term was NEVER applied towards any Europeans.

"Application of the test to each West Eurasian population (using A = YRI and B = CEU) finds NO evidence of [African] mixture in North Europeans."
http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#72839 Aug 21, 2013
Yeahman wrote:
<quoted text>How pathetic use of the word. In fact you reek of a foul smell.
Must be my new deoderant!
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72840 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
The History of the Vikings by Gwyn Jones
Page 76 The Norsemen in Kiev in 1018, despite their unquestioned Swedish origin, were described by Thietmar of Merseburg ( Prince-Bishop of Merseburg Germany, 1009–1018 ) as being for the most part Danes. The Irish annalists were a lesson to all with their division of Norse invaders into White Foreigners, Norwegians (Finn- gaill), and Black Foreigners, Danes (Dubh- gaill), but it was a lesson no one heeded; nor do we know why they distinguished them by colour.
Page 77 The Welsh chroniclers, for example, made no such clear distinction. The Danes coming in by way of England and the Norwegians coming in by way of Ireland were pretty well all black: Black Gentiles (y Kenedloed Duon), Black Norsemen (y Normanyeit Duon), Black Host, Pagans, Devils and the like.
Again, stupidass, Norsemen were never freaken black because black people DID NOT EXIST in Scandinavian nations and most other Northern European countries. That is why Northern Europeans DO NOT have black admixture. Dubgaill and Finngaill was in in reference to the different hair, eye, etc colors found in Europeans, and NOT in reference to any racially "black Norsemen " because there never was any racially black Norsemen, idiot.

"Studies of genetic diversity provide some indication of the origin and expansion of the Viking population. The Haplogroup I1 (defined by specific genetic markers on the Y-chromosome) is sometimes referred to as the Viking haplogroup. This mutation occurs with the greatest frequency among Scandinavian males: Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, and peaking Finland. It is also common near the southern Baltic and North Sea coasts, and then successively decreasing further to the south geographically. Genetic studies in the British Isles of the Y-DNA Haplogroup R1a1, seen also across Scandinavia, have demonstrated that the Vikings settled in Britain and Ireland as well as raiding there. Both male and female descent studies show evidence of Norse descent in areas closest to Scandinavia, such as the Shetland and Orkney Islands. Inhabitants of lands farther away show most Norse descent in the male Y-chromosome lines. A specialised genetic and surname study in Liverpool demonstrated marked Norse heritage: up to 50 percent of males who belonged to original families, those who lived there before the years of industrialization and population expansion. High percentages of Norse inheritance—tracked through R1a1 haplotype signatures—were also found among males in the Wirral and West Lancashire. This was similar to the percentage of Norse inheritance found among males in the Orkney Islands."
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72841 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
Danes who some say tribe if Dan
Danes are Europeans aka white folk, so if Danes are supposedly the "tribe of Dan" then the 'tribe of Dan' was white cause that is what the Danes have always been. Europe is a None Tropical regions with Low UV Radiation that made light skin more cohesive for survival over black skin. That is why native/aboriginal Europeans are among the lightest humans on earth and especially Northern Europeans who carry TWO SETS of the SLC45A2 because they live in regions of Europe, i.e. British Isles, Scandinavian countries, Danes, etc where Lowest UV Radiation is found, dingleberry, which is why Northern Europeans also happen to be the lightest of all humans. Meaning your black skin would not have been cohesive for survival in those northern regions. Now stop trying to connect your dumbass to freaken Europeans who were never black NOR African and have zero black admixture, and go search for your roots in Sub Sahara West Africa,'GMoney' oops a better pseudo name for you is 'GMooRon'.

" Application of the test to each West Eurasian population (using A = YRI and B = CEU) finds NO evidence of [African] mixture in North Europeans."
http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#72842 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
Mark Thomas, from the Centre for Genetic Anthropology, University College London, said other Y-chromosome lineages in Britain from the last 1,000 to 2,000 years probably also have an African origin.
"For example, there's a lineage that's very common in North Wales that's usually found in places like North Africa and Ethiopia," he said.
The new study, Thomas added, "makes the point that we do all have very mixed ancestry."
There are no lineages found in North Wales that are from Sub Sahara Africa because black Africans never had much of a presence in those regions to leave their genetic lineages, that is why Northern Europeans like people from North Wales DO NOT CARRY black admixture. The reason why there isn't much of any ancient black African remains found in the UK or most of Europe is because black Africans did not have much of any presence in Northern Europe, this is why Northern Europeans show to have NO black admixture, stupid. Black Africans hardly ever had an existence in Europe, especially Northern Europe. This is why ancient remains in North Wales, most of the British Isles and in Europe, especially in Northern Europe, show to have ZERO black African lineages, but they do show them to be predominate EUROPEAN in lineages, stupid, such as the Scottish warrior Somerled who was the progenitor of Clan Donald show him to be a member of the European Haplogroup R1a1.
http://www.ourfamilyorigins.com/scotland/r1a....

British Isles Have Changed Little Since Ice Age, Gene Study Says
The genetic makeup of today's British Isles is much the same as it was 12,000 ago, a new science paper shows.
New evidence for the genetic ancestry of modern Britons comes from analysis of blood groups, oxygen traces in teeth, and DNA samples taken from skeletal remains. Ice Age hunter-gathers also colonized the rest of northwest Europe, spreading through what are now the Netherlands, Germany, and France.
The most visible British genetic marker is red hair, he added. "It's something that foreign observers have often commented on," Miles said. "Recent studies have shown that there is more red hair in Scotland and Wales than anywhere else in the world. It's a mutation that probably occurred between 8,000 and 10,000 years ago."
Population estimates based on the size and density of settlements put Britain's population at about 3.5 million by the time Romans invaded in A.D. 43."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min RoxLo 1,458,278
Why and how America needs to pay reparations to... 5 min PolakPotrafi 2
Fidel Castro dies at 90 7 min Tiny Dk 141
Why is Egypt Called the Land of Ham? (May '12) 14 min Barros 74
Will Trump outlaw Cuckolding? 15 min Freaky Harry 1
Poll Why Do Outlaw Biker Gangs Allow Hispanics To Jo... (Feb '11) 17 min yoursteelpot 179
Will Le Pen repatriate Muslims from france? 19 min Barros 28
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 51 min Barros 50,607
Are black people really the real jews? (Oct '12) 2 hr Barros 1,189
no blacks allowed in this thread 3 hr XxwastelandxX 42
More from around the web