Hebrew Israelite
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72803 Aug 20, 2013
lmao wrote:
<quoted text>
How about you go learn your history, not 200,000 years back in sub-Saharan Africa, but 6,000 years ago fool. Learn how you were once black, but by selective breeding, became the undesirable that you are today.
Learn how your people once believed that you were descendants of wolves, and grew strong because you drank the milk from a she wolf's breast! And now you are so confused that you believe that you descended from gorillas. But you are not wolves or gorillas, you are the descendants of the black man and the black woman, the progenitors of all the men and women on this planet.
Um...white people also descended from the very sexy hairy neanderthal so nope white people were never black! The neanderthal was a white hairy boy who slept with African woman in Asia producing Cro-Magnon. Cro-Magnon were the first people in the Middle East,Europe and North Africa 43000 years ago and they continued to interbreed with the very hairy but always very sexy neanderthal until they wiped the poor hairy beast out!
Recreation of a very hairy sexy neanderthal 70 000 years old:
www.zgeek.com/chuck-norris-neanderthal/
Cro-Magnon man:
www.sciencephoto.com/media/481366/view
World DNA map showing whites are MOST DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO BLACK AFRICANS:
www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogrou...
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72804 Aug 20, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
The History of the Vikings by Gwyn Jones
Page 76 The Norsemen in Kiev in 1018, despite their unquestioned Swedish origin, were described by Thietmar of Merseburg ( Prince-Bishop of Merseburg Germany, 1009–1018 ) as being for the most part Danes. The Irish annalists were a lesson to all with their division of Norse invaders into White Foreigners, Norwegians (Finn- gaill), and Black Foreigners, Danes (Dubh- gaill), but it was a lesson no one heeded; nor do we know why they distinguished them by colour.
Page 77 The Welsh chroniclers, for example, made no such clear distinction. The Danes coming in by way of England and the Norwegians coming in by way of Ireland were pretty well all black: Black Gentiles (y Kenedloed Duon), Black Norsemen (y Normanyeit Duon), Black Host, Pagans, Devils and the like.
Nope the Vikings were so white they would make Snow-White cry! Please look very closely at this world DNA map. It shows Europeans ARE NOT RELATED TO BLACK AFRICANS AT ALL:
www.scs.illinois.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogrou...
Afronazis have been lying to you and giving you fake ancient history! THERE WERE NEVER EVER NEVER ANY BLACK AFRICAN NATIONS EVER IN ANCIENT EUROPE!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72805 Aug 20, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
(quotes from "Our Darker Forefathers").
In the Irish annals the Black Vikings are called Dubh-Ghenti, or Black Gentiles. These Black Gentiles on some occasions fought against other plunderers of the Irish coasts known as the Fair Gentiles, who can hardly have been others than the fair Danes or Northmen. In the year 851 the Black Gentiles came to Athcliath i.e., Dublin. In 852 we are told that eight ships of the Finn-Ghenti arrived and fought against the Dubh-Ghenti for three days, and that the Dubh-Ghenti were victorious.
No Vikings were ever black. One more time, EUROPEANS ARE NOT RELATED TO BLACK AFRICANS AT ALL!!!!!!!!
WasetBlackConsci ousSoc

AOL

#72806 Aug 20, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
Danes who some say tribe if Dan
I want to invite youto participate in the Waset: Black World History Conference 2014; at New Orleasns. You must submit a formal paper on your research and there are funds available to offset your personal expenses. If your paper is selected, all of your expenses will be offset. Please stay in touch... There will be an international conference at Kingston, Jamaica. We are inviting Noam Chompsky, and John Anthony West amongst others. Thisis serious scholarship. This is where you belong...Please stay in touch.
NorteMemnon

El Monte, CA

#72807 Aug 20, 2013
North African Soldier figurine found in London.
2nd century!
http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highligh...
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72809 Aug 20, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
North African Soldier figurine found in London.
2nd century!
http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highligh...
He looks European to me!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72810 Aug 20, 2013
WasetBlackConsciousSoc wrote:
<quoted text>
I want to invite youto participate in the Waset: Black World History Conference 2014; at New Orleasns. You must submit a formal paper on your research and there are funds available to offset your personal expenses. If your paper is selected, all of your expenses will be offset. Please stay in touch... There will be an international conference at Kingston, Jamaica. We are inviting Noam Chompsky, and John Anthony West amongst others. Thisis serious scholarship. This is where you belong...Please stay in touch.
Yip research with NO skeletons of ancient people or NO DNA results. Load of Afronazi cr*p based on myths!
WasetBlackConsci ousSoc

AOL

#72811 Aug 20, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
North African Soldier figurine found in London.
2nd century!
http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highligh...

I just view the image...It is another redoubt. I want to insist that you submit a paper for this conference, and any other serious scholar you know make them aware that there are funds being made available for this much needed scholarship. Please stay in touch..Waset....

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#72812 Aug 20, 2013
Color has nothing to do with ones root or identity. Why do people constantly believe that color is an important indicator for ones root rather than genes or skeletal morphology? What does the term 'Black' refers? Does it refer the color or skeletal morphology or does it relate to the genes? Skeletal morphology and the related genes actually take much longer time than skin color. Therefore the debate in skin color can never end, unless there is clear agreement and common understanding on its definition.
NorteMemnon

El Monte, CA

#72813 Aug 20, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
Color has nothing to do with ones root or identity. Why do people constantly believe that color is an important indicator for ones root rather than genes or skeletal morphology? What does the term 'Black' refers? Does it refer the color or skeletal morphology or does it relate to the genes? Skeletal morphology and the related genes actually take much longer time than skin color. Therefore the debate in skin color can never end, unless there is clear agreement and common understanding on its definition.
idk who you talking to but all my source mention origin of these blacks most say North Africa and Mauritania. Thank for not researching. Im aware of mediterranean types,dravidian,negritos but who im talking bout are Negros. Dont worry I got this
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#72814 Aug 20, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
Color has nothing to do with ones root or identity. Why do people constantly believe that color is an important indicator for ones root rather than genes or skeletal morphology? What does the term 'Black' refers? Does it refer the color or skeletal morphology or does it relate to the genes? Skeletal morphology and the related genes actually take much longer time than skin color. Therefore the debate in skin color can never end, unless there is clear agreement and common understanding on its definition.
A Sub-Saharan African does not have the same DNA as a Swede!Africans do NOT have the same skull shape as a Caucasian! That is a fact!
NorteMemnon

El Monte, CA

#72815 Aug 20, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>He looks European to me!
Aye might be. I wouldnt lie and say he doesnt have some features of whites. Thinking a biracial North African maybe mixed tribe Berber.

Yea im done with the campaign for right now. I thought we should explore new frontiers ad get away from the broken record routine but everybody wanna stay on the same subject. Talking about the same stuff.noones budging. Whats the point!? Same ole same ole. Im tryna go global as my spirit telling me to do. West Africa on lock to me so no need to keep goin in on that now we need to get the rest. Im so tired of seeing same ole genetic debates. At last lers switch it to the true hebrew practices and rules lost
NorteMemnon

El Monte, CA

#72816 Aug 20, 2013
Mark Thomas, from the Centre for Genetic Anthropology, University College London, said other Y-chromosome lineages in Britain from the last 1,000 to 2,000 years probably also have an African origin.

"For example, there's a lineage that's very common in North Wales that's usually found in places like North Africa and Ethiopia," he said.

The new study, Thomas added, "makes the point that we do all have very mixed ancestry."
NorteMemnon

El Monte, CA

#72817 Aug 20, 2013
im done carry back to your regular program!

Level 8

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#72818 Aug 20, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>You obviously dont look at much do you dummy
Look and read EXTREMELY SLOWLY:
www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_J1_Y-DNA.sh...
maybe you need to get a new pair of glass. we were talk'n bout J not its subclades...

Level 8

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#72819 Aug 21, 2013
*glasses*
7New Earth7

UK

#72820 Aug 21, 2013
Ben YISRAEL wrote:
Jeremiah 4:1 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith the LORD, return unto me: and if thou wilt put away thine abominations out of my sight, then shalt thou not remove.Jeremiah 4:29The whole city shall flee for the noise of the horsemen and bowmen; they shall go into thickets, and climb up upon the rocks: every city shall be forsaken, and not a man dwell therein.721,b,c to 586 Jeremiah 5:15Lo, I will bring a nation upon you from far, O house of Israel, saith the LORD: it is a mighty nation, it is an ancient nation, a nation whose language thou knowest not, neither understandest what they say, OK WE WAS TOLD THAT THEN THEY ROLL UP LOOK LOOK Nebuchadnezzar II) 605 – 562 BC Chaldean king. Defeated the Egyptians and Assyrians at Carchemish. Is associated with Daniel in the Bible.ok lets see this its more
than 40 arrowhead varieties that can be traces back to the 9th. BCE in the Pontic-Caspian steppeand Transcaucasia. the Scythian s used them on Jerusalem,with the Chaldean s when they was Attacking Judah,Scythian trilobes ARROWHEADS were found at Tel Megadim, Atlit, Megiddo, Keisan, Shiqmona,Samaria, Tel Michal, Gezer, Tel en-Nasbeh, Jerusalem (in the City of David,Ketef Hinnom, and on the Southwestern Hill at Ashkelon, Ekron, Ashdod, Tel Batash, Tel el-Hesi, Lachish, Beth Shemesh, Gil’am, En-Gedi,Tel el-Mazar, Busayra, Tawilan, Umm el-Biyara, Tel ‘Ira, Jemmeh, Kadesh Barnea, Masos,Anthedon, Migdol in the Sinai, and other sites.Scythian Arrowheads,they stem from the Babylonian conquest and they are evidence of a garrison of imperial soldiers during this period. Thus, the arrowheads at Ekron were of Scythian origin,Those found at Ashkelon belong putatively to the Babylonian destructionlayer. At Jerusalem a couple trilobes were found in Babylonian destruction layer, one near atower thought to be used by the Babylonians and the other in the so-called House of Seals.SCRIBES GONE BE UP IN THERE!Scythian Chaldeans shot so many Arrows at them its still a bunch Left!Excavations of Scythian settlements throughout Russia and the Ukraine have yielded various objects which have also been found in the Middle Eastern areas which the Scythians invaded around the time of the Old Testament prophets.- The Scythians had a very specific style of arrowhead.The very same style of arrowhead was unearthed in Samaria, Lachish and Amman (Jordan).
- The same goes for Scythian horse bridles and iron axes.co-operation between the Scythians and the Babylonians, Indeed, there is both historical and archaeological evidence that the Scythians were mercenaries used by Nebuchadnezzar in his attack upon Jerusalem.Scythian arrowheads have been found around Jerusalem in the same material which dates to the Babylonian destruction of the city and temple, Nebuchadnezzar II began a small guerrilla warfare against Jerusalem; then, in 607 B.C., he dispatched a considerable army, and after a while began the siege in person.
So now Daniel is what? From wherew? You ct like u aint so sure of what u say! You knows the ANGEL of the LORD Daniel's GOD was in book. Ok continue.

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#72821 Aug 21, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text> A Sub-Saharan African does not have the same DNA as a Swede!
That is just in the mind of uneducated slaves spent their life for free service in the kitchen, with out reading. Logical men always assume demo-graphical changes and peoples dynamism. How do you understand this statement.

"The presence of dark skin in general is not a reliable genetic marker, including among groups in Africa. For example, Wilson et al.(2001) found that most of their Ethiopian samples showed closer genetic affinity with light-skinned Armenians and Norwegians than with dark-skinned Bantu populations.[99] Mohamoud (2006) likewise observed that their Somali samples were genetically more similar to Arab populations than to other African populations.[100]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_skin
African AE wrote:
<quoted text> Africans do NOT have the same skull shape as a Caucasian! That is a fact!
Dumbass self denying racist. The term 'Africa' and 'African' refers geographical area and never people's identity. North Africans all are meditranian in skull type and have exactly the same skull as the middle eastern.

Caucasians have brachiocephalic type of skull, not typical of ancient Semites. Ancient Semites had a dolicocephalic type of skull, typical of Northern Africa and the middle east and absent in Europeans. Your Cape Malay are never diffrent from west Africans. It is just your tongue that is European.

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#72822 Aug 21, 2013
NorteMemnon wrote:
<quoted text> idk who you talking to but all my source mention origin of these blacks most say North Africa and Mauritania. Thank for not researching. Im aware of mediterranean types,dravidian,negritos but who im talking bout are Negros. Dont worry I got this
The fact that all the people's that you have listed above carry very distinct genetic markers, tells you one important message: These people never had common origin and history. Why are you ignoring that scientific fact? Both Afro-centrists and Euro-centrists have disregarded the existence of people in the intermediate, and these people are of brown race, had glorious history and were founders of human civilization including religion. Why are you all squeezing these people?
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#72823 Aug 21, 2013
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
That is just in the mind of uneducated slaves spent their life for free service in the kitchen, with out reading. Logical men always assume demo-graphical changes and peoples dynamism. How do you understand this statement.
"The presence of dark skin in general is not a reliable genetic marker, including among groups in Africa. For example, Wilson et al.(2001) found that most of their Ethiopian samples showed closer genetic affinity with light-skinned Armenians and Norwegians than with dark-skinned Bantu populations.[99] Mohamoud (2006) likewise observed that their Somali samples were genetically more similar to Arab populations than to other African populations.[100]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_skin
<quoted text> Dumbass self denying racist. The term 'Africa' and 'African' refers geographical area and never people's identity. North Africans all are meditranian in skull type and have exactly the same skull as the middle eastern.
Caucasians have brachiocephalic type of skull, not typical of ancient Semites. Ancient Semites had a dolicocephalic type of skull, typical of Northern Africa and the middle east and absent in Europeans. Your Cape Malay are never diffrent from west Africans. It is just your tongue that is European.
2001 OUT OF DATE! DNA SHOWS ETHIOPIANS ARE MUCH MORE RELATED TO AFRICANS! STOP TRYING TO BE WHITE!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Bluestater 1,233,746
News Must See: Black Family Receives Letter From Nei... 10 min DerekJ 43
Any Texans here? 13 min Nikki 1
I hate being black.. (May '12) 13 min Beautiful Creole 413
News Indianapolis mobile home operator accused of di... 23 min Go Blue Forever 1
News Rand Paul: Republican brand 'sucks' 27 min serfs up 60
Why do good looking black women like white men ... (Sep '12) 40 min Beautiful Creole 6,901
Van Sertima debunked! Afronazis Drowning in Tears! 2 hr African AE 480
Blacks Are Biologically Superior To Whites (Sep '12) 2 hr johnplustwomore 325
why do white people hate other races so much 5 hr 2legit 450
More from around the web