No we are not "blac African'n*****", what is ironic is how little you people understand genetics. That faulty data was based upon ERROR ridden sequencies. In other words it was incorrect. You people take incorrect articles who post misinformation and believe everything they say. based on that ERROR ridden sequence Watson was also shown to be a WOMAN.<quoted text>
How ironic huh? LOL!!!
I guess he much more than past the one drop rule. LOL!!!
Wander how this new found n-word feels now. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm???
So many more of these haters running around around here hsting on Africans/AAs, but guess what??? Their PALE ON THE OUTSIDE...BUT AFRICAN/BLACK/N-GRO ON THE INSIDE!!! JUST DAMN!!!
"On December 9, 2007, a Sunday Times article reported a claim by deCODE Genetics that 16% of Watson's DNA is of African origin and 9% is of Asian origin. The claim to the provenance of Watson's (or anybody's)
DNA, which is at least 99.5% identical between any two humans, has to be understood in terms of a statistical model that explains the provenance of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). This method of analysis is fairly sensitive to errors in the sequencing of the individual's genome; deCODE's methods were not reported and details of the analysis were not published. According to deCODE's Kari Stefansson, the analysis relied on an ERROR-ridden version of Watson's full genome sequence, and Stefansson "doubts
[...] whether the 16 percent figure will hold up", adding that based on the data used "it appears that Watson has two X chromosomes, which would make him a woman."