the historical record tells us that the assyrians went at it with egyptians in canaan. and the hittites went at it with egyptians in canaan. and the babylonians went at it with egyptians in canaan, and the 'sea people' went at it with egyptians in canaan.<quoted text>actually you can think what you want thats also your right. The names my not be accurate but the identity is there. The reason for the disguisjment of the bloodlines is so that you can see why things occured in the fashion that it did. Its in history that the assyrians enslaved the HEBREWS its in history the the romans enslaved the HEBREWS its in history that NEBCHADNEZZAR enslaved the HEBREWS. If youve read any of these histories they never manage to mention that the hebrews were actually EGYPTIANS. Even in the history of the ROMAN AND JEWISH WAR while we know that the Jews were actually hebrews we never really heard that the hebrews were actually EGYPTIANS. Try another route or another ideaology. One thing you are food at is having IDEAS the bad thing your is your ideas have to many loopholes and thats why they arent ever really consider inference.....jjst your opnion. So what now. Are you going ti try and hit us with SCIENTOLOGY now that the egyptian scenario and the kenite Tutsi and hoj scenarios didnt work? Just try figuring out who you arem where did you come from? Then you will be well on your way okay!
egypt lost their canaanite territory during the rise of the babylonian empire and never got it back. so from that point forward judaea was on their own.
sorry if this seems like i'm being random. i just ask a lot of questions and never assume i have all the answers.