Hebrew Israelite

“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#42638 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
For sure, much less than 10% of the AAs would vote for their claims. I know there are many AAs that are logical and scientific in thier thinking. Even, I would say many are disappointed by this rubbish claims and consider it as self denyal and weakinig of moral. I would be happy if I could invite AA scholars, and they definately reject this belief, and stick to their West African origin. Education is power!!!!!!!!!!
Amharas don't number like sands of the sea!!!!
27 Isaiah cries out concerning Israel:
“Though the number of the Israelites be like the sand by the sea, only the remnant will be saved.

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#42639 Dec 6, 2012
Fixing to Break this down for those that got a GRIP on this Heritage! check this!Tiglath-Pileser III or Shalmaneser V, both of whom exercised sovereignty over Babylonia (729–722 B.C.E.).With the death of Shalmaneser V, Merodach-Baladan seized the Babylonian throne (722/721 B.C.E.)ok the Assyrians that had a lil Ham in them tried to STATION OUR BEST FIGHTER IN the Place where the Chaldeans was staging their Attacks on Babylon this going to be when Assyria was In control of Babylon!ok to show you that they took the BEST FIGHTERS see back then a solder would be given a chance to join the Enemy's army! an live! they had away to control the Soldier from other Nations!ok lets look into this!!2 Kings 15:30 The sons of Reuben, and the Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh, of valiant men, men able to bear buckler and sword, and to shoot with bow, and skilful in war, were four and forty thousand seven hundred and threescore, that went out to the war.them was the ones the Assyrians took.they was the tribes the Assyrians took from our land, they was the fighters fighting Assyria everybody THEY WAS SKILLFUL do you knows what that means? they gone be a SOLDIERS THAT KILL REAL GOOD an LOVE THE WAR of ANYKIND!THEY WAS THE BEST!ok lets look at the tribes the Assyrians took an this DUDE DID IT Tiglath-Pileser III,.1 Chronicles 5:26;And the God of Israel stirred up the spirit of Pul king of Assyria, and the spirit of Tilgathpilneser king of Assyria, and he carried them away, even the Reubenites, and the Gadites, and the half tribe of Manasseh, and brought them unto Halah, and Habor, and Hara, and to the river Gozan, unto this day. they took our fighters only, ok they put us in the HEART OF BABYLON TO FIGHT the CHALDEAN S plus WE HAD TO DO PUNISH MENT FOR FOOLING WITH THE ASSYRIANS which turned on us when the CHALDEAN STOCK TOOK BABYLON use helping the Assyrian, an fooling with THEM BRUNG US DOWN its all in the BIBLE,Assyia came an got our FIGHTING TRIBES,! The sons of 1 Chronicles 5:18;Reuben, and the Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh, of valiant men, men able to bear buckler and sword, and to shoot with bow, and skilful in war, were four and forty thousand seven hundred and threescore, that went out to the war.The sons of Reuben, and the Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh,.... These all joined together, living together on the one side of Jordan,They were the sons of Valour," i.e., they belonged to the valiant warriors, "men bearing shield and sword (weapons of offence and defence), and those treading (or bending) the bow," i.e. skilful bowmen.,so them Assyrians taking them tribes gone help them fight against the MERODACH-BALADAN;a Chaldean he wrested the kingship of Babylonia from the pro-Assyrian king Nabunadin-zer. Merodach-Baladan, who also had designs on the kingship, supported the Assyrian king Tiglath-Pileser III,when he Placed the SEPHARVIAMS in Samaria, it was a move the CHALDEAN S wanted to get to them BOOKS in Bethel where Jeroboam had set up a RELIGION, from Egypt, the DEVIL MERODACH-BALADAN was able to trick the Assyrians so MERODACH-BALADAN He was thus able to strengthen his position among the Chaldean tribes, increase his influence in Babylonia, and forge an alliance with Elam,without interference from Tiglath-Pileser III or Shalmaneser V, both of whom exercised sovereignty over Babylonia(729–722 B.C.E.).With the death of Shalmaneser V, Merodach-Baladan seized the Babylonian throne(722/721 see we gone be there on the ASSYRIAN SIDE Fighting the Chaldeans an when they Take ASSYRIA in 612BC the Hebrews Assyria an the Egyptians would have been cool for 90 years!the The Saite period,once the CHALDEANS.612 BC—An alliance of Medes, Scythians, Neo-Babylonians and Susianians besiege and conquer Nineveh at the Battle of Nineveh. King Sin-shar-ishkun of Assyria is killed,612 BC—Fall of the Assyrian Empire and Rise of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. Medes, Scythians, are in Babylon ,Jeremiah 51:27,read it!

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#42640 Dec 6, 2012
JOHNS ON TOP OF IT wrote:
<quoted text>
Man you and looms are always calling your Amhara and Jews Hebrews, but you cannot produce records, showing them fitting this biblical scripture.
68 And the Lord shall [c] bring you into Egypt again with ships by the way about which I said to you, You shall never see it again. And there you shall be sold to your enemies as bondmen and bondwomen, but no man shall buy you. Footnotes:
a. Deuteronomy 28:62 The informed reader scarcely needs to
Well, I have given you several genetic evidences, and what is remaining is to give you documents about Ethiopian Jewish linage and especially that of Ethiopian Jews. It is better if you read it all, so that you may get deeper insight about Ethiopian ancient Jewish linage

http://www.binacf.org/files/The%20Story%20of%...

Read it, it will help you to your understanding.

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#42641 Dec 6, 2012
the king of Scythians, of the lineage of Magog – is in agreement with the Assyrian chronicles, that report Magog as the founder of the Scythian nation in northern Mesopotamia.Trogus Pompeius:«The Scythians possessed the land of Chaldea (Mesopotamia) for 1500 years before any other nations and they are the oldest people of the earth vying even the Egyptians in ancestry».
Plinius:«The Scythian nation by the Persians called Saka was kept as the closest nation to the Arameans of old».(Historiae Naturalis, Book VI)these are your ASHKENAZ an SEPHARVAIM ROOTS

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#42642 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I have given you several genetic evidences, and what is remaining is to give you documents about Ethiopian Jewish linage and especially that of Ethiopian Jews. It is better if you read it all, so that you may get deeper insight about Ethiopian ancient Jewish linage
http://www.binacf.org/files/The%20Story%20of%...
Read it, it will help you to your understanding.
hell you want devil??

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#42643 Dec 6, 2012
african wrote:
Glimmer you seem to be very confused claiming the exact same people the Jews of today descended from. The Ashkenazi Jew, Shepardi Jews and the North African Jews are closely related and DNA proves that they come from the same ancestor in Israel thousands of years ago. DNA taken from the Ethopian Jews shows they are not related to any of the above groups at all but developed in isolation and therefore are not Jews but converts. The Lemba are the only black Africans that have Jewish DNA but will have to convert to Judaism if the ever want to go to Israel because they are Christian Jews. Thats right you get Christian Jews! No other black Africans have Jewish DNA and the right-wing Jews and Reform Jews have shut the doors to African converts. Jews in Israel only accept children from Jewish women as real Jews so its only a matter of time before Jewish men who have wives that are not Jews will no longer allowed in Israel.
Other than the DNA evidence I gave you, it is better if you have some information about Ethiopian Jews. Just read it, and come up with your comments

http://www.binacf.org/files/The%20Story%20of%...

I am not a Jew, but an orthodox christian.

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#42644 Dec 6, 2012
they call hebrew DNA negro! that why u cant c pass truth! negro bad name! attach anything to the negro name an its made to look bad! that negro name they the jews build it up to what it is thru they books media! schools! all those name r made up by non other then the jews! we didnt even speak English when we came! they the jews had names an history waiting on us when we got off ships! they gave us these names! jews own the plantations we was forced to work on! plus they the jews wrote themselves out of history! they was the slave holders!,if i make a name bad an say all kind of bad things bout that name!an i keep doing it decade after decade! any name r meaning associtated wit that name is made bad! why cant u dumb whitepeople c this? cause u dont want to! yo heart is evil!deep n yo mind u know the truth! u just dont want it to spread!

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#42645 Dec 6, 2012
Ben YISRAEL wrote:
<quoted text>hell you want devil??
Do you think I have something against your learning of the bible? No! I am even in support of you calling yourself a Jewish convert, if you want. What I am requesting is your evidences to be Jewish descendant by blood.

Level 6

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#42646 Dec 6, 2012
Ben YISRAEL wrote:
they call hebrew DNA negro! that why u cant c pass truth! negro bad name! attach anything to the negro name an its made to look bad! that negro name they the jews build it up to what it is thru they books media! schools! all those name r made up by non other then the jews! we didnt even speak English when we came! they the jews had names an history waiting on us when we got off ships! they gave us these names! jews own the plantations we was forced to work on! plus they the jews wrote themselves out of history! they was the slave holders!,if i make a name bad an say all kind of bad things bout that name!an i keep doing it decade after decade! any name r meaning associtated wit that name is made bad! why cant u dumb whitepeople c this? cause u dont want to! yo heart is evil!deep n yo mind u know the truth! u just dont want it to spread!
Why are you always running to your poletics? You are talking non-sense and something that you should forget. I am now to attach your claims as a revenge to the Jews? Is it? that is rediucules. They are one way or the other carried certain genes from the middle-east while almost zero in your case. Don't be fanatic poletician pls!

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#42647 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think I have something against your learning of the bible? No! I am even in support of you calling yourself a Jewish convert, if you want. What I am requesting is your evidences to be Jewish descendant by blood.
not good enough devil

Level 8

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#42648 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you always running to your poletics? You are talking non-sense and something that you should forget. I am now to attach your claims as a revenge to the Jews? Is it? that is rediucules. They are one way or the other carried certain genes from the middle-east while almost zero in your case. Don't be fanatic poletician pls!
gas fo yo weak ass

Level 8

Since: Oct 09

Paris France

#42649 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think I have something against your learning of the bible? No! I am even in support of you calling yourself a Jewish convert, if you want. What I am requesting is your evidences to be Jewish descendant by blood.
It's not for me to tell but you still have not understood that Hebrew Israelites don't have any part with anything Jew-ish, they don't want to be confused with the Jew-ish people and even less with the colonial Jew-ish Zionist state of "Israel".

The point is not being a Jewish convert.
It is not either reading the Bible, everybody can read the bible even an "edomite" like me. The question is and has always been to interpret the Bible.
Then Hebrew Israelites - with some big differences exposed in the whole thread - are considering they are the Chosen People and give another reading of the Bible than Jewish people and Christians (Orthodox, Protestants or Catholics).
As for the focus on DNA, there is no DNA testing form in the Bible : The Name is not asking people to pass a DNA test to be within The Chosen.

i hope these plain elements will help you to better understand what is at stake in this thread because you seem completely lost among words with different meanings from those you stick to.

a white/redboi
White Rabbitl

Charlotte, NC

#42650 Dec 6, 2012
Judah wrote:
<quoted text> no ish. We all know tribes in Africa dont have jewish DNA. And..... Not everyone uses Jewish law and DNA as the standard. The Lemba didnt need a DNA test to validate them, lmhao. Like I said, what you keep ignoring, the Hebraic historical accounts, archaeolgy, traditions, and rituals among specific tribes in centreal west africa , is undeniable and not debatable. And Yes the AA and West Indian are decendents of these tribes. We are decendents of the biggest forced dispersal of a people in world history. You dont think God wrote about the Trans atlantic slave trade? Get real. If your going to just post dna wiki stats all day your waisting your time here. Can u provide some scriptures for once. Is this the Hebrew biblical Isralite thread or not? If the.bible aint a solid source wtf are u doing here?
judah you and me both know they could care less about some damn bible. They havent even consider the fact that its written in a LAW DICTIONARY as DIVINE LAW. DIVINE LAW which means that NATURALLY its going to happen or that natured decreed and predestined all that id happening now by the people who by the will of the most high used mathematics to determine what would happen in a later time in result of certain behavior patterns. They cant get past the BLACK FOLKS CIMING TOGETHER FOR A COMMON CAUSE. We come together in reverence to declare our selves by sound mind and real reason that we are by LAW these people in this law. the scriptures are no different than the american constititution. The AAs are the PEOPLE and the our ancestors wrote that Testament( Will, contract) and the articles( statutes, commandments) divinely, positively, and naturally inspired and to be executed. It is by natures law that such a time would come where we would wake up, even to here that we are not who we say we are from our advesaries. We dont no compensation from anybody outside our goal because our deliverance is determined reason of your concern, or unnessary philosphy, yes i said PHILOSIPHY. For all the non believers or INFIDELS on topix look up Divine Law, Nature Law, Positive Law in the law dictionary, ill have the crazy ready when you need to pick up your craked egg face!
White Rabbitl

Charlotte, NC

#42651 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think I have something against your learning of the bible? No! I am even in support of you calling yourself a Jewish convert, if you want. What I am requesting is your evidences to be Jewish descendant by blood.
well then its simple anybody who can READ can see whats going on in those scriptures glimmer. Your a christian and dont know this book is divine law. Your suppose to be governing yourself accordjng to the old testament. Oh my bad yall christians dont live by the old testament, yall live by the word of JESUS CHRIST lol! That wholw GRACE concept is going to get yall christians in a world of trouble. Considering the fact that Grace is no other then the permission from a new power proceeding supposedly fron the old, to do anything that your not supposed to be doing and you get pardoned from it. If thats how you want to live fine, but then WHO HOLDS YOU ACCOUNTABLE FOR YOUR ACTION. If your faith doesnt provide correction or hold you accountable then your faith is a fraud. Alsi let it be a known fact that we never referred to our selves as jews but only in the heritage that they usurped from us. The funny thing is those caucasians AKNOWLEDGE themselves so your gram of insight as to who they are and who we are is dubious. As far as resulting to politics, you missed the point that the SCRIPTURES are LAW. How is it that your a christian oh my bad a pagan who thinks hes king, and cant see this. Before you come and tell us who we are, how about yout go clear up the issues that you have with your RELIGION, we dont believe in fairy tells, and its obvious you do.
White Rabbitl

Charlotte, NC

#42652 Dec 6, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not for me to tell but you still have not understood that Hebrew Israelites don't have any part with anything Jew-ish, they don't want to be confused with the Jew-ish people and even less with the colonial Jew-ish Zionist state of "Israel".
The point is not being a Jewish convert.
It is not either reading the Bible, everybody can read the bible even an "edomite" like me. The question is and has always been to interpret the Bible.
Then Hebrew Israelites - with some big differences exposed in the whole thread - are considering they are the Chosen People and give another reading of the Bible than Jewish people and Christians (Orthodox, Protestants or Catholics).
As for the focus on DNA, there is no DNA testing form in the Bible : The Name is not asking people to pass a DNA test to be within The Chosen.
i hope these plain elements will help you to better understand what is at stake in this thread because you seem completely lost among words with different meanings from those you stick to.
a white/redboi
yall are really underestimating this guy. The stage is yours today man.

“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#42653 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
For sure, much less than 10% of the AAs would vote for their claims. I know there are many AAs that are logical and scientific in thier thinking. Even, I would say many are disappointed by this rubbish claims and consider it as self denyal and weakinig of moral. I would be happy if I could invite AA scholars, and they definately reject this belief, and stick to their West African origin. Education is power!!!!!!!!!!
This information I provided you yesterday comes from the genetic atlast...Google it? You're still dodging the questions. Is it because you can't produce the evidence coinciding with the Biblical narrative??? I really would like to know the answer to that question.

Amhara nor Jews are as numerous as the sands of the sea. So, how do you make your numbers mesh with the Biblical narrative??? I really would like a straight forward answer from you for a change. Stop being like looms.evry time he can't answer something he's got to slip in some slick attack word like: PARANOIA...OR SOME OTHER STUPID SHYT LIKE THAT. YOU EVEN DID IT YOURSELF YESTERDAY. BUT I'M PART THAT AN JUST WANT REAL ANSWERS.

frequencies Neohumanid mutative history Y- Population tree DNA studies
E1b1a (V100) This population is one of two important populations to spring out of the Ethiopian Plateau, E1b1a effect became the most dominant population in Subsaharan Africa E1b1a1 (M2) This population grew in enough numbers in the Ethiopian lowlands to be able to cross into the territories of Paleo Africans on their West E1b1a1a (L576) This population represents an East to West thrust in Africa, only E1b1a lineage able to survive crossing the A1b1 territories E1b1a1a1 (L86.1) This mutation indicates that the population crossed the A1b1 dominated Grassland into the regions West of the great Lakes E1b1a1a1a (M58) Expansion between the Great Lakes & Midwest Africa E1b1a1a1b (M116.2) Very small minority in Mali E1b1a1a1c (M149) Very small minority in South Africa E1b1a1a1d (M155) Very small minority in Mali E1b1a1a1e (M10) Dispersed between Cameroon & Tanzania E1b1a1a1f (L485) An important lineage that emerged in the Eastern Benue valley E1b1a1a1f1 (L514) Marker for a strong lineage that played a major role in turning West Africa into their new territor E1b1a1a1f1a (M191) This marker indicates that the main body of (L485) reached the Benue Rive E1b1a1a1f1a1 (P252) A population that followed the Benue river South, an important marker of the Bantu expansion E1b1a1a1f1a1a (P9.2) The population that remained in the Be

“THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#42654 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I have given you several genetic evidences, and what is remaining is to give you documents about Ethiopian Jewish linage and especially that of Ethiopian Jews. It is better if you read it all, so that you may get deeper insight about Ethiopian ancient Jewish linage
http://www.binacf.org/files/The%20Story%20of%...
Read it, it will help you to your understanding.
C'Mon man, you are acting as if I don't know ETHIOPIAN HISTORY OR GENETICS that's passe' for me. I want you to show me where You & Jews fit the Biblical Narative: "BEING A HEBREW SLAVE...YOU KNOW...LIKE THE BIBLE SAYS...ONE WHO COULD BE SOLD!!!"

Then I would like to see you describe how 9th century (Kazars Converts 800 A.D.) Europeans trying be classified as Israel??9
Judah

Tacoma, WA

#42655 Dec 6, 2012
Glimmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, actually DNA results sofar, has put the Ashkenazi, almost at the bottom. It is better if you like it, and DNA tests are today linking Africa as the founding linage of Judaism. EM-34 or its descendant EM-84 is the highest in Ethiopia, and the Ashkenazim are not even among the longer list. Sceince is always a real remedy for chaoes and it has to be free and genuine. My friend thought the effort to find common ancesster has convinced him to link them to the ancient, but that was wrong. No body accepts you with out science.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E1b1b1c
We are not seeking scientific validation,.thats the point.
Black Deal

Lockhart, TX

#42656 Dec 6, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not for me to tell but you still have not understood that Hebrew Israelites don't have any part with anything Jew-ish, they don't want to be confused with the Jew-ish people and even less with the colonial Jew-ish Zionist state of "Israel".
The point is not being a Jewish convert.
It is not either reading the Bible, everybody can read the bible even an "edomite" like me. The question is and has always been to interpret the Bible.
Then Hebrew Israelites - with some big differences exposed in the whole thread - are considering they are the Chosen People and give another reading of the Bible than Jewish people and Christians (Orthodox, Protestants or Catholics).
As for the focus on DNA, there is no DNA testing form in the Bible : The Name is not asking people to pass a DNA test to be within The Chosen.
i hope these plain elements will help you to better understand what is at stake in this thread because you seem completely lost among words with different meanings from those you stick to.
a white/redboi
Devil your white ass be from Japeth

Edomites Hebrews

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#42657 Dec 6, 2012
Ben YISRAEL wrote:
<quoted text>you doing yo best not to say nothing to me hahahah, im WATCHING what you say, soon as you stray off, CLUB coming out
Actually it YOU THAT RUN FROM MY POSTS I have already debunked your BULL and PLUS ASSHUR IS NOT THE SON OF NIMROD

Genesis Chapter 10
22 The children of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram.

Asshur was a son of SHEM NOT HAM So I always bring that CLUB TO YOUR AZZ cuzz YOU HAVE NO UNDERSTANDING of NOTHING

Now this is aTHE KING of ASSHUR or the ASSYRIANS his name is Esarhaddon this is him being mentioned in 2 King

37 And it came to pass, as he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch his god, that Adrammelech and Sharezer his sons smote him with the sword: and they escaped into the land of Armenia. And Esarhaddon his son reigned in his stead.

Ancient Assyrians :
Assyrian King Esarhadon reigned 681-669 B.C
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...

THAT is a NEGRO: SHEM HAM JAPHET are all NEGRO MEN the WHITE race was not even around at this time the early days of creation THERE WAS NO WHITE RACE in the BEGINING of CREATION.

SHALAM

SLAMIN YOU AGAIN HUH BEN

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
My advice to Donald J Trump... 22 min Israelite Suprema... 12
No more BM/BW couple? Is black love dead? 22 min Cigar Face 25 97
News Churchill bust back in Oval Office 45 min From Britain 4
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 45 min Grey Ghost 1,482,588
Afrikaners are not African, not up for DEBATE (Jan '13) 59 min Real African 78
Where is Drilling The Nerve?????????????? 1 hr Emperor_Jagi 2
I am not a big fan of blacks 1 hr From Britain 9
News Being conservative is not being racist 2 hr Ben Quick 36
How soon will Trump be impeached? 2 hr Ben Quick 29
BEN QUICK just got busted as a black girl troll... 2 hr Ben Quick 33
Eurocentric Myth Busters: Blacks Are Naturally ... 5 hr Real 103
More from around the web