DRAGONPAT, does she speak for ALL AAW?

DRAGONPAT, does she speak for ALL AAW?

Posted in the African-American Forum

STFU

United States

#1 Aug 20, 2012
Dragonpat wrote: <quoted text> fk you christians and FK the church!!!

http://m.topix.com/forum/afam/T32055S75J5UP6E...

I can list thousands of black female pastors and what is DragonPat calling them?

Vashti Murphy McKenzie - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/.../Vashti_Murphy_ ... Vashti Murphy McKenzie (born 28 May 1947) is a bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal Church.

Bishop Vashti McKenzie - Speakers Bureau www.apbspeakers.com/.../bishop-vashti -... Bishop Vashti Murphy McKenzie serves as the 117th elected and consecrated bishop of the African ...

The 13th Episcopal District of the A.M.E. Church www.13thame.com/The AME ChurchBelieve, Inc.This Is Your Wake Up Call!Praycation with Bishop. The Thirteenth District ... What's happening right now
Star

United States

#2 Aug 20, 2012
Back to the top
Star

United States

#3 Aug 20, 2012
This is interesting, not one response
They Might Be Giants

Lockhart, TX

#5 Mar 30, 2013
Dude, if you think Bayou and Dragonpat are the same person then you are mentally ill. It sounds like you're just desperate and will say anything off the top of your head. You sound insane or at the very least totally ridiculous. I am very familiar with quite a few writing styles of various posters and I would be totally shocked if those two were one and the same. Get a grip because it sounds like you're losing it.
THE RELIC

United States

#8 Mar 30, 2013
Who are you trying to persuade, me or yourself?

You ought to take a refresher's course on

Disinformation:

* Repeating the same factual claims over and over even when people have proven that such claims are contrary to the evidence (for example, the claim that no planes hit the Twin Towers)

* Spending more energy causing in-fighting and disruptions then helping to promote the truth, and causing dedicated activists to waste time rebutting obviously false claims and theories

* Unnecessarily alienating large sections of the population by attacking victims' families, certain religious or ethnic groups, or political parties with no reason

* Calling someone names instead of addressing that person's theories or claimed facts

* Making knowingly false statements about someone

* Threatening people or their families with violence, job loss, or other forms of intimidation or harassment

* Acting as provocateurs to disrupt peaceful groups or gatherings

People who repeatedly do one of the above things even after people have pointed out what they are doing, are spreading disinformation -- consciously or unconsciously. Indeed, because disinformation may be an unconscious activity, I prefer to call it "disruption". These actions disrupt the ability to spread 9/11 truth and to obtain justice against all of those who carried out the attack.

No matter how much seemingly good 9/11 truth work someone has done in the past, if someone starts causing more disruption than good, than he or she should not be followed any more. This is especially true if people have pointed out that person's disruptive behavior, but he or she has carried on disrupting 9/11 truth work anyway.

The 5 Goals of Disinformation

The 5 goals of infiltrators of the 9/11 truth movement (or any movement challenging fascism) are to: Distract, Disrupt, Divide, Discredit and Derail.

Specifically, avoid people whose actions mainly have the effect of:

* Distracting, disrupting, or derailing 9/11 truth efforts;

* Dividing the truth movement; or

* Discrediting leading 9/11 activists

To remember this list, just think of "the 5 D's of Disinformation".

If It Quacks Like A Duck ...

9/11 activists spend a lot of time trying to figure out who is a government "disinformation agent" and who is not.

I would argue that it is a total waste of time.

If someone is being disruptive, or seems to pursuing one of the 5 goals of disinformation, then he or she is causing problems and should be avoided -- or at least not given a megaphone. It doesn't matter what the motivation is: whether ego, confusion, or a government paycheck.

Sure, some people might want to understand someone's motivations to know whether or not to give him or her a second chance. That's fine.

But if it quacks like a duck, its probably a duck. Its a waste of time to try to figure out why it quacks, or whether its a mandarin duck or a mallard. Just treat it like a duck
Amelia DUBSTEP XStasy

Castle Rock, CO

#9 Mar 30, 2013
No, she doesn't.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min BlueFlag 1,603,114
NFL verses NASCAR 4 min Got_Rope 1
News On Twitter, Trump accuses blacks of racism thre... 18 min GraspThe Obvious 137
Once you go black NO ONE wants you back! (Apr '09) 18 min spyrograf jr 7
News Trump Repeats Call to Fire Athletes Who Kneel f... 22 min Marcus Washington 82
DISRESPECTING Whites; Demise of Euro-centric Wo... 22 min Tom 2
Is it possible that Blacks built smaller pyrami... 25 min Marcus Washington 22
Negroes are vulgar, degenerate perverts. 46 min 7tonir 36
NFL ratings declining 1 hr Little Bigfoot 40
White Desperation on Topix to have Blacks ACCEP... 3 hr Whitesupreme 32
More from around the web