The Knights Templar was founded by a ...
Be still my crackka

Houston, TX

#26 Jul 7, 2012
Goldsboro, NC

I almost took an assignment there until I checked city data and found it's full of spooks, no thanks.

As for Hugues de Payens, he doesn't have a nappy head, so moon cricket he is not.
Klaus666

Toronto, Canada

#27 Jul 7, 2012
Pathetic n!88## filth trying to ride the coat tails of White humanity and civilization, next!
DumDictum

Philadelphia, PA

#30 Jan 14, 2013
WHAT WHITE HISTORY? WHITE HISTORY BEGAN IN 18TH CENTURY BEFORE THAN THE CLASSIFICATION "WHITE" AND "BLACK" DID NOT EXIST! DANES, JUTES NORSEMAN, NORMANS, CELTS, SKATELINGS ETC ETC ARE HISTORICALLY BLACK "Origins of the Anglo Saxon Race" pg112.
DumDictum

Philadelphia, PA

#31 Jan 14, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>
You are full of bs. Hugues de Payens was white. His family ancestry was from France and his mother was not from Arabia, she was European and so was his father.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BaldwinII_c...
Now stop wishing you had white history and ancestry.
who taught you France was "white"?
DumDictum

Philadelphia, PA

#32 Jan 14, 2013
Klaus666 wrote:
Pathetic n!88## filth trying to ride the coat tails of White humanity and civilization, next!
lol @ white humanity white civilization! knock it off! baphomet baphomet! baphomet! that!
Jax

Los Osos, CA

#33 Jan 14, 2013
This is pathetic; as pointed out before, actual illustrations from the Middle Ages clearly show that

Godfrey of Boullion was clearly Caucasian:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

Not only that, but he wasn't 'Moorish Royalty' either. He was the second son of Eustace II the count of Boulonge, and Ida of Lorraine or were also depicted as, you guessed it,'White People':

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

Now this is probably going to get written off as 'Whit Debil Tricks' or some other pristine example of human stupidity and oh, how long is it before you idiots bring up the infamous Albino Migration? Which, despite the fact that there's absolutely NO Historical and Archeological Evidence to support this, you idiots zealously believe in it in a desperate attempt to distance yourselves from Africa as much as possible (which I find to be downright hilarious). Of course what point is there in arguing with a group of people who use the Bible as a source of evidence.
thinkers

Dublin, OH

#34 Apr 20, 2013
a--x--e wrote:
<quoted text>
This dumb, Afrocentrist bytch is the same idiot that claimed that the atomic bomb was designed to emulate black men's sexuality.
She has an extreme case of melanin poisoning.
...What is a folic symbol?
Sean Coonery

London, UK

#35 Apr 21, 2013
GiRLTeAcHOn wrote:
Hugues de Payens was a French nobleman and of moorish royalty. He was the first grand master of the Knights Templar...
It was he, and eight of his cousins who were the first knights of this order...
You can look him up on wikipedia, and the picture they have for him is of a "swarthy" like man, but nevertheless, he was black, not mixed with Arab, not some type of Berber or Eurasian, but BLACK!
you people are almost unbelievably stupid. The Moors were NOT black.
Sean Coonery

London, UK

#36 Apr 21, 2013
DumDictum wrote:
WHAT WHITE HISTORY? WHITE HISTORY BEGAN IN 18TH CENTURY BEFORE THAN THE CLASSIFICATION "WHITE" AND "BLACK" DID NOT EXIST! DANES, JUTES NORSEMAN, NORMANS, CELTS, SKATELINGS ETC ETC ARE HISTORICALLY BLACK "Origins of the Anglo Saxon Race" pg112.
of course there was no black history then, This was before we got infested with stupid blacks claiming to be Moors, Vikings, Pharoahs and so on. What a golden age! all those European cities totally coon-free!
Richard R Welch III

Jonesboro, GA

#38 May 2, 2013
I read all of your post, No Hugues de Payns was not a black man nor did he have any middle eastern in him......though even then the knights Templar were not solidified in membership to just white people. Though the majority were of caucasion persuation but if you do you home work admist all the racism I see you would find in their history a multitude of members were of different races, and some birth children of different cultures, I am such a product of that,an african american not only of the blood of white lust in his veins, but because of this I have claim to several things that make my life and family history worth the disgust of one man's indiscretion , I am proudly of noble birth but sad that it came from a white man, so not all of us like having this disease called WHITENESS in us but thankful that you gave me the wealth and heritage i have
The Hiddon One

Cowpens, SC

#40 May 6, 2013
Someone please explain to me the logic behind Africans not being Moors when in European countries these very people are depicted as African just like the real portrait of Madona and St. Maurice the first ever Knight who lalso led the Roman Theban Legion. The Moorish flag has the head of a African man and there were indeed African Vikings regardless of the pure retardation you hear from Efrom the retarted redneck or any other b.s. spouting hatemongering reject. What sence does it make for there to be a white egypt or carthage in the African homeland when the African bloodline is spread from Africa to Austrailia and maybe to America if it's proven that the Olmecs are what many believe them to be. Those who control history control the mindsof those who are unwilling to find truth that lies hidden behind the viel thats very pressence goes unquestioned by fools who'll fall for anything
Jake

Ardsley, NY

#42 May 7, 2013
The Hiddon One wrote:
Someone please explain to me the logic behind Africans not being Moors when in European countries these very people are depicted as African just like the real portrait of Madona and St. Maurice the first ever Knight who lalso led the Roman Theban Legion. The Moorish flag has the head of a African man and there were indeed African Vikings regardless of the pure retardation you hear from Efrom the retarted redneck or any other b.s. spouting hatemongering reject. What sence does it make for there to be a white egypt or carthage in the African homeland when the African bloodline is spread from Africa to Austrailia and maybe to America if it's proven that the Olmecs are what many believe them to be. Those who control history control the mindsof those who are unwilling to
find truth that lies hidden behind the viel thats very pressence goes unquestioned by fools who'll fall for anything
There were no African Vikings, you stupid g roid. Your ugly gorilla black skin is not suited for our Nordic lands.
Nyarlathotep

San Luis Obispo, CA

#43 May 7, 2013
The Hiddon One wrote:
Someone please explain to me the logic behind Africans not being Moors when in European countries these very people are depicted as African just like the real portrait of Madona and St. Maurice the first ever Knight who lalso led the Roman Theban Legion. The Moorish flag has the head of a African man and there were indeed African Vikings regardless of the pure retardation you hear from Efrom the retarted redneck or any other b.s. spouting hatemongering reject. What sence does it make for there to be a white egypt or carthage in the African homeland when the African bloodline is spread from Africa to Austrailia and maybe to America if it's proven that the Olmecs are what many believe them to be. Those who control history control the mindsof those who are unwilling to find truth that lies hidden behind the viel thats very pressence goes unquestioned by fools who'll fall for anything
Black Vikings?... Ok, where's your evidence? Exactly; there is none.
The Hiddon One

Cowpens, SC

#44 May 8, 2013
Norwegians were known to the Irish as fionn-gall ('white strangers'), and the Danes were dubh-gall ('dark strangers'). It may also harken back to Gaelic mythology, and the fir bolg - a race of 'dark strangers' said to come from the eastern seas that were conflated with the Danes in medieval Irish popular culture. Oh and just because they say that they're from germany dosen't automaticly make them white so look up Venus of Willendorf figurines found in europe.
Jake

Ardsley, NY

#45 May 8, 2013
The Hiddon One wrote:
Norwegians were known to the Irish as fionn-gall ('white strangers'), and the Danes were dubh-gall ('dark strangers'). It may also harken back to Gaelic mythology, and the fir bolg - a race of 'dark strangers' said to come from the eastern seas that were conflated with the Danes in medieval Irish popular culture. Oh and just because they say that they're from germany dosen't automaticly make them white so look up Venus of Willendorf figurines found in europe.
Yeah it does make them automatically white, you stupid g roid. Danes, Norwegians, Irish, Celts, Germans, etc were and still are white. They were never described as black. You black gorilla g roids did not exist in our European lands and you did not exist in our Nordic lands where your ugly black skin is not suited for survival. All those Europeans you mentioned are our ancestors who evolved into humans and have nothing to do with you ugly sub human g roids. You g roids like to claim you are the oldest race around well that also means you are the least evolved of all races that is why you look the closest to gorillas and why you have the lowest IQs. Put a black next to a gorilla and the likeness is astonishing.
http://www.google.com/search...

You look nothing like us Nordics and other Europeans, we are human, you are sub human. See the difference:
http://www.google.com/search...

Now stop trying to claim our Superior White Ancestry and Identity, stupid g roid. Stick to your undeveloped 3rd wolrd sh8tlands in Aperica.
Claudius

Winnipeg, Canada

#46 May 8, 2013
Afro-centrists will always try and claim non black, non-Sub Saharan achievements and civilizations as their own. They claim Egyptians were black yet DNA results show Tutenkamun shares DNA with most white Europeans. They claim black Africans taught the Greeks philosophy, that is another lie, look at any African slum and tell me that. I saw that Huges de Payens pic after a google search, he has dark skin, but is not negro. Afro-centrist know that their history sucks and will always claime others' history. Stick with your own history which is mud huts, bongo parties and cow showers.
Nyarlathotep

Gilroy, CA

#47 May 8, 2013
The Hiddon One wrote:
Norwegians were known to the Irish as fionn-gall ('white strangers'), and the Danes were dubh-gall ('dark strangers'). It may also harken back to Gaelic mythology, and the fir bolg - a race of 'dark strangers' said to come from the eastern seas that were conflated with the Danes in medieval Irish popular culture. Oh and just because they say that they're from germany dosen't automaticly make them white so look up Venus of Willendorf figurines found in europe.
*facepalm* The Danes were describes as being 'dark' because they had darker hair than, say a Norwegian or a Swede. Also take note that back in the day; 'dark' could literally mean bad news, as the Danes were the Northmen who raided excessively, while the Norweigans were Raiders as well, but were also decent Merchants and Explorers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikings

Also take note that the Kievan Rus, the Northmen who conquered a part of Russia, were described as being pasty skinned and red haired. So they weren't black either.

So; in the end they weren't black.
jimmy

Mission Viejo, CA

#49 Mar 20, 2014
All of you people have a problem
Level 1

Since: Dec 11

Lake Hiawatha, NJ

#51 Sep 17, 2014
((((2014 RESPONSE)))) LOL

No.. A black man did not create the Templar Knights, that's just inaccurate.

HOWEVER... The ancient world, was not so separate, as people ignorantly think today. There were no doubt black (Moors) Templar Knights, who accepted, and were Christian.

As I mentioned earlier, about the ancient world not being so separate as people think. This was even more so in Roman era, which were more advanced in all ways than people were dark/middle ages. So much technology, and experiences were lost, and forgotten- and things just went downhill, which is why the era after in Europe, was the "Dark ages".

Anyway- before the Crusades (which we need another, but that's a different topic lol), the Catholic church had already made a black man (moor) a saint. This was the Roman soldier Maurice- who moved up in rank, and became a leader a legion- he was also a Christian, so were many (or all if I remember correctly).

Years later, with the creation of the Templar Knights, and of course when the Crusades were starting up. Templar Knights, and or wannabe Templar Knights, would have no doubt known who Maurice was, and was probably one of their favorite saints.

Again going back to the ancient world not being so separate. There also actually was a black Viking. Viking was/is not a race, or nation. just a word that described a warrior/marauder. The only way one could be accepted (besides being skilled battle-wise), is being 100% loyal to the Jarl (Earl), AND the pagan gods (they were far more strict with that stuff than the Romans were).

The Scandinavians or as people would say Vikings, actually had a friendly trading relationship with Africans (most likely thought/saw them as Dokkalfar "Dark Elves"), and actually sold slaves to them, who were from Eastern Europe (Slavic) and even people of Ireland. Ancient paintings of the Viking ships porting slaves, for themselves, and for trading- looked a lot like the ships that later brought slaves from Africa- sold to whites, by Africans.... Which is part of why I can't stand people who bitch so much about slavery... Everyone was a slave.

A lot of this stuff isn't talked about in history (especially real American history of blacks), as we all know the left owns academia- and they like to keep blacks feeling as if they were ALWAYS victims.
Level 1

Since: Dec 11

Lake Hiawatha, NJ

#52 Sep 17, 2014
Finally.(Oh and excuse any typos, sleepy and trying to stay awake.)

Templar Knights actually still do exist today, but its all super secret society stuff- no way are they all out there as they once were, which I find pretty interesting- and kinda creepy. Anyway, there are black members, but in order to be one, besides whatever weird crap is done- you must be a Christian, and a Mason. There were also black Freemasons- it was quite attractive to some free slaves.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson should be on Mt R... 2 min Bill 13
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Earl 1,509,147
Why Are Black People So Greedy And Selfish? 7 min Bill 26
Ask this honky. A truthful answer to any racial... 29 min Ttt 3
Bright side of Trumpcare. 1 hr RMG Mundo 21
Trump ~ BLAME the DEMS!! 1 hr Dan Snow 27
what do you call six million burned corpses? 1 hr Kato 36
White men are the solution for the single black... 1 hr Sok 151
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 11 hr Brown Jade 1,419
More from around the web