Billsa right-wingers opened liberal amounts of space

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe he'd be willing to tell us how many books he's written.
As if that would absolve him of stealing someone else's work.

And now, you of all people call me a thief...I have written many...just not published....It wan't stolen...it was still in progress........He will get the credit..actually he already did by my friend oh..whats his name....

Chess Jurist wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't insult you; you insulted yourself.
Don't put your plagiarism or deflection on me.

But you brought it up..talking in circles now "chess" you are better than that..I have read some of your earlier works, come on let it rest!

SWEET POTATOE wrote:

<quoted text> Why disam,I'll have to lok and see where the mason dixon line runs. A fellow i did a lot of business wtih back in the 1990's in cape may,n.j. let me know that cape may was below the mason dixon line. I have to see if OCEAN CITY falls below the THE LINE. any way as usual, you a nonchristian started the ugliness about sisters. ALL i've seen from you is filth. Your mind is corroded with filth.

No, it's not, idiot, and YOU conflates surfing with me marrying my sister. Take responsibility for your own actions for once, you petulant child. Substitutional atonement has left you emotionally vacant.

Logistics Supervisor wrote:

<quoted text>Just like the greatest race horses of all time..my blinders have kept me on the path that "I" found so many years ago, after I lost the rose..darkly stained glasses that "I" used to wear...I was using "Chronological, Historical, Arhaeological..evidence that one writer put together based on findings of thousands of other scientist and historians well known and respected in the community...I have thousands more editions..writings....parchmen ts....tablets....etc. at my disposal....I doubt if I were to use them on this thread "you" would ever change your narrow minded way of thinking? Am I right or am I right?

None of that was put together by 'scientists'. Only biblical apologists put it together. Archaeological findings meshed to fit the myth.
So please, list these 'scientists and historians' for us. Let us have the chance to look up their history.

SWEET POTATOE wrote:

<quoted text> Why disam,I'll have to lok and see where the mason dixon line runs. A fellow i did a lot of business wtih back in the 1990's in cape may,n.j. let me know that cape may was below the mason dixon line. I have to see if OCEAN CITY falls below the THE LINE. any way as usual, you a nonchristian started the ugliness about sisters. ALL i've seen from you is filth. Your mind is corroded with filth.

The lowest point on the Mason-Dixon Line is the South West corner of Delaware, and that is located approximately at 38.460041 degrees North, 75.693398 degrees West. You are probably only thinking of the Southern border of Pennsylvania as the Mason-Dixon Line, and that is not true. The Mason-Dixon Line also includes the Western border of Delaware.

So, technically, all of New Jersey lies ABOVE the Mason-Dixon Line.

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text> The Shack is a copyrighted book which requests permission of the author to quote any portion of his book.
I suppose you got that. Right?

Getting to you huh?.....

Not Of This World Forever wrote:

<quoted text>
Except that would be contrary to God's plans from the beginning.
It was His intent all along for Jesus to be born to die.
He was the sacrificial lamb, to put an end to the sacrificing, once and for all.
God gave His only begotten Son so that we might have Eternal Life.
my view is based on those that believe in Christ crucified and risen.

And your view is stupid and immoral.

Not Of This World Forever wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, that's about the ultimate crime in my book too.
Castration doesn't even suffice as they just use other methods.
As i said, i'm glad i'm not God when it comes to them.
i wouldn't even bother to wait till judgement day.
Buttt .... that's why i'm not God!
;o}

Yup - I am not god either. Good thing too. I am not very forgiving of certain crimes. If I were "The Boss", some would die on the spot because of their crime.

SWEET POTATOE wrote:

<quoted text>So, what do you have to say about disambiguity's filth that he posts?:)

Yes, she has. Pay attention, dish drain.

JNielsen71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hmmmmm, interesting.(~snores~)

That was worth more than two cents..do you want change?

Logistics Supervisor wrote:

<quoted text>Exactly..I actually found the real one!!!!!!!!!!

One of millions. Right for you, and you alone.
Stop with your proselytizing on this thread. If you haven't guessed by now, even the other fundies don't respond to your craziness.
That says a lot!

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text> None of that was put together by 'scientists'. Only biblical apologists put it together. Archaeological findings meshed to fit the myth.
So please, list these 'scientists and historians' for us. Let us have the chance to look up their history.

Buy the book..or look it up on the net..please...

Logistics Supervisor wrote:

<quoted text>Si..."Yo TANGO "YESHUA!"

Si Yo Tengo Jesus!

Logistics Supervisor wrote:

<quoted text>It was the culture and "religion" of the time...All young virgins wanted to be "THE" one, Mother of GOD!!!

That's strange. I didn't know there was ever a time in history that 'all young virgins' wanted to be raped.

Logistics Supervisor wrote:

<quoted text>She was "Married and a virgin..you got that part right..but her betrothed knew about the prophesy and thought it could be a good thing!

She was married AND betrothed? Wow! Guess things were a lot different for women back then than they are now. I thought it was only the men who got to have multiple partners.

Hey "nymph" and "chess" it was "real"..but not "real fun"...Got to go do important stuff now! It is time to get ready to end Shabbatt.......

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text>One of millions. Right for you, and you alone.
Stop with your proselytizing on this thread. If you haven't guessed by now, even the other fundies don't respond to your craziness.
That says a lot!

I have to answer that then..maybe they do not own the same decoder ring I own..but I cannot answer for them...since they have you to answer for them....

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text>It was a metaphor for what you do here daily.
The idiocy of fundie christians.

And you thought i didn't know that. funny.

water_nymph wrote:

<quoted text>That's strange. I didn't know there was ever a time in history that 'all young virgins' wanted to be raped.

Come on you of all people are better than that...you been hang'n round "dis" way to long...read the prophesy...O.T.

US Citizen 07 wrote:

<quoted text>
See, and I feel the opposite.
I believe our acts leave profound imprints on this world. But to me, our body and possessions have nothing to do with who or what we are.
Even though I know you will disagree.
But that's ok.

I will have to somewhat disagree with you on this.
Who and what we are is in part what we accomplish on many levels, not just the spiritual level.
Accomplishment is whatever we do in life that makes us better people and leaves the world a better place than we found it.
Not all people have the talent to make a difference on a one-to-one basis, which is what I gather you are talking about.
Some people use their accomplishments of a monetary nature to improve the world. Some people use their natural talents to gather people together to do good deeds.
I don't think in the long run it matters how you better yourself and others, just that you do.
I don't think either that having no possessions is much of an accomplishment of any sort. Why would one need to be poor and without material possessions in order to be spiritual? If you have nothing you have worked for and need to care for, how will you know how to care for that which is given you?
JMO