Group urges CW stations not to air 'Gossip Girl'

The Parents Television Council ??

WTF !!
A bunch of over the hill grannies with nothin better to do !!

triple6vamp wrote:

The Parents Television Council ??
WTF !!
A bunch of over the hill grannies with nothin better to do !!

Pretty much... get ahold of their 'member list' and you will see about 5 70+ year old grannies who most likely haven't had sex in 40 years or more!
These IDIOT older people are going to have to realize that people don't have a problem with sex anymore and feel that it is N A T U R A L, period and done with, between two adults and sometimes, in other situations and age groups together.

Liberalism continues to destroy our society.

They won't be happy until we are all equal...equally perverse
gutter dwellers, that is.

Yeah,let's not air anything on t.v. that might show how real life is. Let's just play cartoons and infomercials 24/7! Soap opras have actors and actresses who have bedded 20 or 30 people over the years,and that's okay,but God forbid,they show anything else. To all you conservative right wingers who are so against this kind of thing,where were you when they found that huge white church out in the desert where they married 14 year old girls to 50 year old men,and had the orgy room in the back? Where was your 'OUTRAGE' then? If it's happening in 'REAL LIFE',with people you are connected to,then let's pretend we don't see it,and we'll go after a freakin''T.V. SHOW'! Even God could'nt understand you people.

triple6vamp wrote:

The Parents Television Council ??
WTF !!
A bunch of over the hill grannies with nothin better to do !!

They are supposed to educate parents about TV content. Not decide tv content.
http://www.parentstv.org/

"PTC- A nonprofit organization dedicated to educating parents about television content"

Use the damn V-chip lazy ass parents..

Just more trash on tv. No surprise.

The Hero wrote:

Just more trash on tv. No surprise.

A sexual threesome is trash ??

Arent you an old fuddy duddy

triple6vamp wrote:

<quoted text>
A sexual threesome is trash ??
Arent you an old fuddy duddy

If that is what you call a person with morals.

triple6vamp wrote:

<quoted text>
A sexual threesome is trash ??
Arent you an old fuddy duddy

I do have to agree with you on that one.

Get real wrote:

<quoted text>
If that is what you call a person with morals.

Why is a 3-some immoral?

Hyrax wrote:

<quoted text>
Why is a 3-some immoral?

Ask a clergyman.

Get real wrote:

<quoted text>
Ask a clergyman.

I did and all he could say is sex before marriage is wrong. That would make pretty much all sex on tv bannable.

Hyrax wrote:

<quoted text>
I did and all he could say is sex before marriage is wrong. That would make pretty much all sex on tv bannable.

If you did, I seriously doubt that is all he said.

Read the Bible, from beginning to end...you can skip the "begats"

From a common sense stand point, ask yourself why the most successful societies in history adhere to husband & wife unions.

There are far more reasons to promote monogamy than promiscuity than I can list here.

Besides, I seriously doubt you are seeking emlightenment. Your bait looks like that of a Liberal relative moralist, and I've got better things to do than argue with a closed mind.

Hyrax wrote:

<quoted text> That would make pretty much all sex on tv bannable.

PS - It would "pretty much make all sex on TV" immoral. You, however, are the only one talking about "banning".

Problem with Liberalism is it "pretty much" forces itself on everyone. It isn't content with being an alternative, it wants to be the norm.

Its simply,don't like it,don't watch it.

Get real wrote:

<quoted text>
PS - It would "pretty much make all sex on TV" immoral. You, however, are the only one talking about "banning".
Problem with Liberalism is it "pretty much" forces itself on everyone. It isn't content with being an alternative, it wants to be the norm.

Read the damn article. The PTC doesn't want it shown. That sounds like banned to me.

Get real wrote:

ask yourself why the most successful societies in history adhere to husband & wife unions.

I really don't need to, since this is about sex and not marriage.

Hyrax wrote:

<quoted text>
I really don't need to, since this is about sex and not marriage.

Your disconnect is telling.

Hyrax wrote:

<quoted text>
Read the damn article. The PTC doesn't want it shown. That sounds like banned to me.

Then you need to look up the definition of

PTC "to ask affiliates of the CW network".

Banned - "the act of prohibiting by law"

Do you see the difference?

However, PTC has a valid point:
"Will you now be complicit in establishing a precedent and expectation that teenagers should engage in behaviors heretofore associated primarily with adult films?"

er - ignore:
"Then you need to look up the definition of "

I was going to say "banned", but decided to just post the definition. bad editing...