E. Andrea Miller, M.Ed., MA, Inducted into Cambridge Who's Who

It has always puzzled me why some South Indians and Sri lankans look similar to some Aboriginal people of Australia. I guess there could be a gentic link (there appears to be without concrete proof). There is definately a linguistic link as many words in the aboriginal languages derive from languages like Telugu, Tamil, 2 languages in Southern India and Sri Lanka, wehre Dravidians reside.

Abroginees don't eat smabhar AND RASSAM, idly dosa and vada, Aborginal are dumb while south Indian are intelligent and have highest literacy, South Indians are very spiritual though many like to go to disco and shag in the bush, Abroginal spent most of their life in sniffing petrol and molesting their family members. Abroginal have lowest life expectancy in the OECD countries while South Indians have the highest. Apart from some physical features, there is little similarity, most of the people say sanskrit is the mother of all European languages but there is little similarity between Aryan culture and wild wild west.

Batman wrote:

Abroginees don't eat smabhar AND RASSAM, idly dosa and vada, Aborginal are dumb while south Indian are intelligent and have highest literacy, South Indians are very spiritual though many like to go to disco and shag in the bush, Abroginal spent most of their life in sniffing petrol and molesting their family members. Abroginal have lowest life expectancy in the OECD countries while South Indians have the highest. Apart from some physical features, there is little similarity, most of the people say sanskrit is the mother of all European languages but there is little similarity between Aryan culture and wild wild west.

I think you are probably not quite well read.
1- Aborigines and South Indian dravidians share common ancestory. The Dravidians however have thrived beacuse of constant contact with other tribes in the sub-continent.
Dravidian cultures have also enriched the Indo-Iranian cultures of North and West India.
ALL INDIANS ARE A ADMIXTURE OF DRAVIDIANS AND CAUCOSOIDS IN VARYING DEGREES.
2- Linguistically it is well known that Dravidian languages are a distinct grouping in itself with several loan words from a proto-IndoIranian language.

aboriginals dont have large round eyes, a sharp and narrow nose or doliocephalic skull. these are all dravidian traits. dravidians are caucasoid. australian aboriginals are australoids. south indians are pure dravidians that have as much to do with aboriginals as chinese people.

there is no human or living - race or origin with out demolishment by european. in that asia, africa are escaped.

south indians and north indians have australoid influence. low caste tamils having the highest australoid influence in south india.

there is no such thing as a "dravidian" race unless your term "dravidian" means the wave of major west eurasians who migrated to the indian subcontinent 10 000 years ago.

dravid means south in sanskrit. nobody used the term "dravidian" in any ethnic sense ONLY untill the colonial era.

dravidian is a language. south indians speak dravidian but that does'nt mean they were the original speakers of the language.

okay north indians too have australoid influence but the australoid admixture was lighter skinned that that of south india.

but yes overall southern and eastern parts of India has the highest australoid influence.

The link is more likely to be accepted as recent DNA studies show promise. Also the relatve development of Tamils and South Indians is the result of competitive stress from around them and overpopulation. the aborigines on the other hand have been isolated for over 40,000 years - or more

Questions.
Why did the Aborigines move
When did they start the diaspora

Most aborigines are genetically closer to mongols than they are to most Indians. Haplogroup C may have originated in India, but Haplogroup R which descended from F is most likely to have originated from India. While Indians may look like people outside of India, if anything those particular groups of people look Indian. The Aryan invasion was a tactic used by the british to divide and conquer. There is no solid physical evidence for an invasion eastward into India. As for the aboriginals they suffered a similar fate to their C cousins in Asia. The C group was almost wiped out in the southern regions of Asia by incoming arrivals of F descendents. This forced the C group of modern day mongol/turkic/various siberians to settle in the cold unfertile regions of North and Central Asia.

person wrote:

south indians and north indians have australoid influence. low caste tamils having the highest australoid influence in south india.
there is no such thing as a "dravidian" race unless your term "dravidian" means the wave of major west eurasians who migrated to the indian subcontinent 10 000 years ago.
dravid means south in sanskrit. nobody used the term "dravidian" in any ethnic sense ONLY untill the colonial era.
dravidian is a language. south indians speak dravidian but that does'nt mean they were the original speakers of the language.
okay north indians too have australoid influence but the australoid admixture was lighter skinned that that of south india.
but yes overall southern and eastern parts of India has the highest australoid influence.

Actaully if tehre is any link between South Indians and Dravidians, it is very small (as per the findings of many scientific studies). Also, the pure Dravidian groups make up no more than 25% of Indian population and concentrated almost solely in South India.

Indian wrote:

<quoted text>
Actaully if tehre is any link between South Indians and Dravidians, it is very small (as per the findings of many scientific studies). Also, the pure Dravidian groups make up no more than 25% of Indian population and concentrated almost solely in South India.

There is no Dravidian race, that was British propaganda.

Indian wrote:

<quoted text>
Actaully if tehre is any link between South Indians and Dravidians, it is very small (as per the findings of many scientific studies). Also, the pure Dravidian groups make up no more than 25% of Indian population and concentrated almost solely in South India.

Bullshit Indians are of Dravidian stock whether they are from the North south east or west. SOme may be hybridised with the so called Aryans, Australoids,Mongolians etc but the Dravidian stock predominates, throughout India. This is the reason most Indian are very similar looking . They may come in different shades of brown, but more or lass have the same facial features body language etc.

Siva Sankaran Sarma wrote:

<quoted text>Bullshit Indians are of Dravidian stock whether they are from the North south east or west. SOme may be hybridised with the so called Aryans, Australoids,Mongolians etc but the Dravidian stock predominates, throughout India. This is the reason most Indian are very similar looking . They may come in different shades of brown, but more or lass have the same facial features body language etc.

More British propaganda. On the quest for their fantasy race. Of course their precious anglo-saxons are said to be at the top of the racial order, when ironically most English are genetically Britons similar to Welsh and Scottish not Germanic.

Indians invented "Aryan" culture. Vedic culture is Indian.