Authorities looking for 2 items Somer Thomspon had when she was abducted, killed

Perry Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok, let me explain again. She is put in some kind of trash bin. Her stuff possibly too. She is picked up in the trash by means of a garbage truck. Then brought to a central location where she is dumped with the trash only to be scooped up and then brought to the GA land fill where she was found. That is the answer to two of your questions. She may have gotten separated from her things while being transfered to each location. As for getting hit by a car? Getting hit by a car would be less damage to her body then to have gone through two compactors.
I still feel those kids threw her stuff in a dumpster and walked off laughing. A baby sitter said that somer often was picked on. So that is how she may have gotten into the dumpster and couldnt get out before a garbage truck dumped it. Its just a theory. We dont have a case of murder as instead one of manslaughter.

That sounds like a very good theory. i wonder if they have even thought about that. the kids will eventually tell if this happened i would think. the only thing is i think she would have cried out, unless something stopped her from doing that. i think you have made a very good point. it is worth thinking about. that would answer a lot of the questions.

I see another Marilyn from Alabama commented but want to say that is not me though I agree with some of those thoughts.

I was watching the evening news and they interviewed the mom who had her attorney present with her. I didn't know she had one before but tonight she is still behaving strangely IMO but maybe she is taking some prescription drugs or something. She was sniffling at times in the interview without any visible tears and an odd demeanor. She talked about getting some emails blaming her from south carolina and said people want to blame her so they don't have to think their child is at risk.

That may be true but most of these kids are harmed by family or someone close to the family. They said the family has a website and take donations on it. This all seems very strange to me.

I'm not saying she did anything to her child but there is something not right with this mom.

Marilyn wrote:

I'm not saying she did anything to her child but there is something not right with this mom.

I would love to see more updated videos. This is some of the reason i have saved a lot of info from the start because when it hits the fan i want to see how close i was. Like you said, something is not right about the mom. If she even knows the truth of what happen, regardless if she is directly involved, then she will have toppef Susan smiths performance.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/local/news...

Here's a link for today's news interview

From an FBI study

u Adult offenders are responsible for 55
percent of juvenile victimizations, most
disproportionately for kidnaping, sex
offenses, and the victimizations of children
younger than 6 and older than 15.
u Family perpetrators make up 20 percent
of the offenders against children,
but they make up a majority of offenders
against children under age 4 and
are disproportionately represented
among kidnapers and sex offenders

Other studies have also shown that it is from 45 to 50percent of crimes against children of her age are done by other children either peers or older.

I am still wondering about the fight she had at school and the missing items it would seem would only appeal to a child if they weren't overlooked in the trash.

Marilyn wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you know if the mother has taken a polygraph test?? I haven't heard anything on it.

If the detectives and the garbage truck driver didn't take a polygraph, why would the mother be stupid enough enough to agree to one when the US Constitution, the one that US service men and women are dying for in Iraq and Afghanistan, says that a person has a right to refuse police questioning...which includes the polygraph.

Somer talked to the men in the burned out house at 1080 Gano Ave. then supposedly went around the fence. this is the last known sighting of little Somer. Did she still have the lunch box and her back pack at this time? i do not recall if that information is available or not??

a child saw Somer in front of the burned out house, but was it before or after she went to the house? too many unanswered questions in this case

lily marie wrote:

a child saw Somer in front of the burned out house, but was it before or after she went to the house? too many unanswered questions in this case

i would doubt the sketchy stories that vaguely put her in front of that house or behind the fence on that given day. Its been too long to accurately tell one day from the next as im sure if she ever talked to those men or went behind the fence then she had done so more than that one day. So they might be confusing one day from the next. But who ever knows the truth will sound like bells going off and a beacon to light the way. Why just so happen to be that there was a scuffle that same day? And for her older sister to admit that even she turned on her own sister. I find that very disturbing.

Perry Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
i would doubt the sketchy stories that vaguely put her in front of that house or behind the fence on that given day. Its been too long to accurately tell one day from the next as im sure if she ever talked to those men or went behind the fence then she had done so more than that one day. So they might be confusing one day from the next. But who ever knows the truth will sound like bells going off and a beacon to light the way. Why just so happen to be that there was a scuffle that same day? And for her older sister to admit that even she turned on her own sister. I find that very disturbing.

perhaps a small amount of skepticism on any story. but i certainly would check every little clue that was given. from what i hear a sex offender was one of the workers on the house. IMO it was not a sex offender that snatched Somer, at least not one from the Orange Park area.
Your story about her climbing into the dumpster held some bit of thought a very real possibility. traffic is quite heavy on those streets. if you pull up the google map and look there are plenty of things to hide behind. i will look again but i do not recall a dumpster on the walk from the school, but i would think there very well could have been. Somer was less than a block from the school from the last alleged sighting of her, it does not really seem likely that she could have simply vanished without someone seeing her.
I find those same things disturbing as you do but i have my own idea, but not sure. i just do not want to point a finger just yet. i wondered about the scuffle also. there are a lot of things that do not add up.

IF the mom is trying to protect her other children from the media and tabloids, then it would all make alot more sense. That would actually explain the mom's crazy behavior.

MomOfAnAngel wrote:

IF the mom is trying to protect her other children from the media and tabloids, then it would all make alot more sense. That would actually explain the mom's crazy behavior.

I always felt the parents of JonBenet were protecting her brother who was also a juvenile. There was evidence that he had gotten the pineapple out of the fridge for her and all the other things about the room being vaccumed, the note with info that wasn't public and so many other things but I never thought the parents would stick together if one of them did it but only to protect that remaining child and that much of the evidence was to cover it up. They blocked interviews of him and could because he was a minor.

Now I am wondering about this case if they have looked at the siblings or others since it is almost 50-50 statistically that it is another child when the victim is between 6-14.

Amwricas most wanted was on last night. John walsh looked like a million dollars. Damn i cant stand his ass anymore.
But they brought up somers case again in a glimps. Showed the bag and lunch box. But good ol' mom, they showed just a sliver of video from her. She really looks psycho! She keeps saying the same thing over and over. Like its all well planned and rehersed. I can expect a rehersal for tv, but she is saying the same exact thing, in the same exact order as day one! Like, saying to take somebodies child and dump them in the trash, big misteak! Big misteak!
How about focusing on the fact your child was dead before or at the first trash can! The fact that someone is responsible for her untimely death and forget the detail of where she was found. No doubt, ending up in the trash is a very negative feeling to cope with. But, do you notice that she is so sure herself that this was a murder? I mean, she has had to hear of the speculation by now that this could be an accident. And not saying this is her fault, ok, yes i am, but not in this way. She doesnt seem to carry any guilt for letting her kids roam free to and from school. I would be lost in time and living each moment over and over of how to change time! Even if she is not responsible, i dont like her and think she has another side we have not seen yet. She reminds me of my sister inlaw to a tee. And if this was her? I would know better!

Goodmorning americas video cut says somers pink lunchbox was inside of her pink bag. How would they know this? Must have been a common thing for her to do or the kids remember because they only threw one friggin bag in the dumpster for her to retrieve. Why cant they see that?

The mother is not sincere. I get the creeps everytime I watch an interview or police report with her present. Drugs or not, she is too calm and collected. Her thoughts are too precise. She is speaking in complete, rehearsed sentences. This does not seem like the scattered thoughts that would most likely come from a mother that was looking for, or had lost a child, or one that was on medication. If she was on meds to keep her calm, I don't believe she would be able to think as clearly as she is. A woman who is in shock or extreme distress would be displaying more random actions. Also, her supposed "yelling" at the abductor was not yelling. She raised her voice and recited her premeditated script. Although not everyone is the same, you can tell when someone wants to get you to harm you. I suspect that a mother that wants to get her hands on an abductor would have stared into that camera, and people would get chills from the look in her eyes like she was about to leap through the tv screen.

I agree with matlock lol. The momma is like a broken record. It wouldnt be the first time the cops were quiet because the were starting to question the family. Just watch crime tv. Happens a lot. They spend months working a case and then when it go's cold they start looking at the parrents or other family members.

Perry Mason wrote:

I agree with matlock lol. The momma is like a broken record. It wouldnt be the first time the cops were quiet because the were starting to question the family. Just watch crime tv. Happens a lot. They spend months working a case and then when it go's cold they start looking at the parrents or other family members.

Exactly. I believe that's quite possibly what is happening here. That may be why everyone is noticing the unusual way the police are handling this case. I agree with your thoughts on how the police may just be holding back information so the mother will slip up.

not solved, yet? Hmmmmmm.

Richard_ wrote:

not solved, yet? Hmmmmmm.

nope, they are waiting for time to pass so they can release the most important info a year from now on unsolved mysteries. Then they can renew their popularity with the voters.