Jun 20, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger
Full story: Whittier Daily News![]()
Comments
|
"Westerhoff said the changes really do nothing at all."
So, why make them? Just anothr rule nobody will read or follow. "The code now as amended in 2006 would not allow most homeowners to do anything with their properties, City Manager Shauna Clark said." Time for her to move on. |
||||
|
“Exclusive Investigation!” Joined: Jun 24, 2007 Comments: 20 La Habra Heights ISP: Hacienda Heights, CA |
View Preservation is so important to one resident he has filed suit against the City of La Habra Heights over it. The City has scheduled a Special City Council meeting on Monday June 22, at 5:30 PM to take up the matter in closed session.
CLOSED SESSION 5.Conference with Legal Counsel The City Council/Agency finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Govt. Code § 54956.9(a) Thomas Jiunn Chiang Yeh and Ting Kara Yeh. v City of La Habra Heights Case No. LASC #BC415747 View the Lawsuit exclusively at: www.TheAvocadoExpress.com Stay on top of the Heights at: www.twitter.com/LaHabraHeights EOM |
|||
|
Thanks to the Whittier Daily News for showing where the lines are.
Westerhoff clearly knows the changes will have an effect. That is their purpose. It looks like he will keep saying "the changes really do nothing at all" all the while the City is covered in concrete and huge homes. The City Manager said: ""Anyone who wanted to add a pool or a deck or change a driveway had no way to go," Clark said. "What makes a city thrive is reinvestment by its property owners. If you can't do that, it's a problem."" The first part is so untrue, either she was misquoted, or she has never read the Code, or she feels her job depends on saying whatever it takes to get the Council's redevelopment agenda through. The second part, about reinvestment, depends on what she means. If she means people maintaining their homes and keeping them up to date, that is fine. If she means, continually remodeling, adding more building area,tearing things down, etc., that is just building industry propaganda. It is fine if someone wants to remodel, but a city can "thrive" fine without it. |
||||
|
AOL |
Something is really added concern over the acts of Mayor Vipperman. He sent out a letter to all who commented on the proposed planning changes again ranting that his "oops" email was stolen. That is an outright false and malicious lie. Second, he has publicly accused George Edwardz of "stealing" the email. Another outrageous, false and malicious lie. At the June 22, 2009 meeting Mayor Vipperman paid a snide, insincere apology to Mr. Blagdon, but refused to pay an apology to Mr. Edwardz. Vipperman probably should have kept his mouth shut and not apologized at all, because it was the far opposite of sincere and thoughtful. Too bad Mr. Vipperman does not know when to quit digging that hole.
|
|||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| La Habra Heights mayor sues former candidate fo... | 28 min | Reality Check | 10 |
| La Habra Heights mayor sues former candidate fo... | 7 hr | Volunteer | 25 |
| Gubernatorial candidate Poizner talks tax cuts,... | Nov 7 | mrtuesday | 2 |
| La Habra Heights: Who Controls the Tap? | Nov 2 | resident | 7 |
| Conduct of La Habra Heights Improvment Associat... | Nov 1 | Flatlander | 21 |
| Religion Briefs: Animals to be blessed at St. S... | Oct 31 | Joshua Flores | 2 |
| La Habra Heights “Three Amigos” Axe Oversight C... | Oct 29 | More Reason | 59 |