Oct 3, 2008
Porn producer sentenced to federal prison for obscenity
A 50-year-old Altadena man was sentenced on Friday to 46-months in prison for violating federal obscenity laws.
Comments
|
Not Max!! oh no
|
|
|
sounds like a Plain -McSame supporter
|
|
|
OK, I'll throw this open to comments: who wants to define for me what's obscene?
HINT: Giving an example is not a definition. Ready? Okay … go! |
|
|
Obscene-meaning foul,repulsive,used in legal context to describe expressions [words,images,actions] that offend the prevalent sexual morality of the time...vagtastic
|
|
|
The "prevalent sexual morality of the time" changes from block to block and minute to minute. What good is a law that changes definitions depending on where you are, and who you are talking to? How do you police a state of mind? This is a waste of time, jihadis may be sneaking up on us, but dirty videos are not. What a load off my mind!!!!
|
|
|
I totally agree with you, it is a First Amendment issue that has not been fully settled.
|
|
|
Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote ...,the basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be A. whether the average person,applying contemporary community standards would find the work taken as a whole appeals to the pruient interest.B. whether the work depicts or describes in a patently offensively way sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law. C. Whether the work as a whole lacks serious literary artistic political or scientific value.
|
|
I totally agree with you Kelly. If consenting adults are involved, and these were probably staged acts, who is to tell me what I can or can watch? No animals hurt, no people actually injured, no children. And how do you prevent a clip from being downloaded to a state that says that type of material is "illegal" via the internet? Give me a break. |
|
|
Oct.4 1961 LENNY BRUCE arrested for obscenity. Overturned 1970 by NYC COURT of APPEALS PEOPLE V SOLOMON 26 NY .2D621.
|
|
|
I have not seen the movies for which MR. LITTLE is being arrested for, I am just guessing it could have involved bondage with the involvement of actual sexual intercourse which i heard is against the law, but i am definitely not sure,hope someone in the industry could elaborate on this subject?
|
|
|
Kelly also points out ''how do you police a state of mind?'' which reminds me of the MOTHERS OF INVENTION song WHO ARE THE BRAIN POLICE?
|
|
|
I think there's a pot-kettle issue involved...
|
|
|
This is modern day Anthony Comstock BS. Max's stuff is vile, but only those who sought were exposed to it. Truly a waste of time and tax payer $$$. Typical that this would go down in Florida.
|
|
|
"gross profits " indeed!
|
|
|
When Lenny Bruce was arrested for obscenity in southern California, a key was the testimony of an obscure LAPD Vice Squad cop, formerly a waiter at Canter's Deli, named Sherman Bloch. Whatever happened to him, and his good buddy John Samuels, once a Canter's Deli waiter at the same time as Sherman, and later head of the Altadena Sheriff's station, sued for election fraud involving the Altadena Town Council and $250,000 in marked bills from narcotics transactions buried in the lawn of the former Chairman (and later Election Chairman) of the Altadena Town Council? And why should we believe that this corruption, which the FBI investigated to send 5 crooked cops to jail, has ended in our lovely and sexy community?
|
|
|
Sept. 2005 FBI anti porn squad was formed targeting websites such as www.red rose stories.providing text -only fantasy stories, other BDSM websites have closed themselves down due to legislative burdens.,Nice to know where the priorities of the FBI stand,,,,,friggen lame.
|
|
|
“Standing up for truth!” Joined: May 23, 2008 Comments: 487 Wherever I may roam. ISP: Los Angeles, CA |
Definition of obscene:
The US Government spending taxpayer money to prosecute the filming of consensual sex acts. |
|
The FBI, protecting you from your inner fantasies since 1935.
|
|
|
I wonder why they decided to prosecute this one. I'll have to look up his porno and see what kind it is.
|
|
|
"… the basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be
"A. whether the average person,applying contemporary community standards would find the work taken as a whole appeals to the pruient interest. "B. whether the work depicts or describes in a patently offensively way sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law. "C. Whether the work as a whole lacks serious literary artistic political or scientific value." OK, let's drill down through this. C'mon people, you can answer these! A1. Who's average? Why? Prove it—somehow. A2. What are "contemporary community standards"? Contemporary how? What community? What standard(s)? Prove to me why I should have to adopt those standards in my private home. HINT: "Because everbody needs you to" or "… thinks you should" is not enough of a reason. Dig deeper! A3. Define prurient. HINT #1: GIving an example is not a definition. HINT #2: Using adjectives from previous comments in this extemporaneous little colloquy is lazy. Be creative—you might convince me! A4. Define prurient (which Pablo mistyped). SEE HINT #1 above. B1. What's patently offensive? Prove why I should think the same as you about this. You can do it!(You all see where I'm going with this? It's fun!) B2. What's sexual conduct? HINT: Beware narrow definitions; remember "perversions" are individually defined. B3. Prove why any state law regulating should be considered the final authority on what is sexual conduct—let alone on whether the conduct is patently offensive.(Boy, this is hard, huh? Feel like giving up yet?) C1. What is serious literary value? Prove your contention. What is serious artistic value? Same. What is serious political value? Same. What is serious scientific value? Same. HINT: Giving examples here may be vivid, but isn't the same as proof. Use your critical thinking skills! Go ahead—take your time. I'll come back when you're done & check your work. |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor a `no' on R | 4 hr | Why Do We Le... | 16 |
| Paddy's Pig has a wee bit of the Irish | 7 hr | glendale joe | 2 |
| Large brawl reported in Altadena | 12 hr | pasadena nor... | 86 |
| Seven people arrested in Altadena brawl | 14 hr | Lou | 50 |
| Arrests made in street brawl | Wed | Random Educa... | 35 |
| Shooting called gang-related | Wed | gottawonder | 1 |
| Police investigate whether three shootings related | Nov 30 | Mack | 4 |

50°F