Aug 20, 2008
Cervical cancer shots less cost-effective with age
An expensive vaccine aimed at preventing cervical cancer makes sense for young teens when it comes to cost-effectiveness, but not for women in their 20s, contends a new report.
Comments
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merck to fund Vioxx settlement in August | 1 hr | DJ -SMD | 1319 |
| MPI Research cutting jobs in Mattawan | 2 hr | Harold | 5 |
| Claims administrator: Interim payments in $4.85... | 3 hr | heraldo | 983 |
| Buffalo - The Next Cleveland? | 4 hr | Wow | 14 |
| Cymbalta leads the way for Lilly (from Feb '07) | 4 hr | edd | 232 |
| Vioxx claimants rush to join $4.85B settlement ... (from Jan '08) | 4 hr | IronLady | 647 |
| Teva Announces Launch of Generic Zoloft (from Nov '06) | 7 hr | KGH Monroe NC | 1113 |
