Can GM Really Build the Car of the Future?

The list of new models from GM just shows how clueless and disorganized GM still is.

Take for example, GM designed a Cadillac CTS based coupe and a CTS based station wagon, both originally for 2010. GM could only afford to start manufacturing of one, and those choose the station wagon over the coupe.

Why is that bad? Well, Cadillac is also starting manufacturing of a new downsided 2010 SRX crossover. The downsided SRX is about the same size and shape of this CTS station wagon. Basically, two very similar vehicles being announced at the same time. Clearly, they will compete with each other for sales, and both in the same Cadillac showroom.

GM needs to STOP competing with itself, and start competing with its competition. But, clearly, GM has yet to learn that lesson.

GM hasn't got a clue and his cars will continue to be scrap on wheel. Gm is good for the car repair shop, as it's the most repaired brand in the world, even worst than KIA. So yes GM is good for the economy because even if you don't even drive your GM, it will simply rust right there unless you live in a warm climate.

tiguss wrote:

GM hasn't got a clue and his cars will continue to be scrap on wheel. Gm is good for the car repair shop, as it's the most repaired brand in the world, even worst than KIA. So yes GM is good for the economy because even if you don't even drive your GM, it will simply rust right there unless you live in a warm climate.

Thats funny I have owned gm vehicles for 30 years and cant complain on anything, and will continue to buy them!!!